Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this gay-marriage issue as important as the flag burning issue?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
myomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 11:54 AM
Original message
Is this gay-marriage issue as important as the flag burning issue?
Remember daddy's flag burning issue and his trip to a flag making company during his campaign? These people are masters at trying to divide the country. Haven't we had enough of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. As fond as I am of flag-burning, this is more important. Here's why

This has nothing to do with gay people, or marriage.

It's about equal protection under the law and separation of religion and state.

bush's proposed amendment will require amending the first amendment and repealing the 14th, to avoid constitutional crisis and decades of court challenges.

If I want a law that says you have to follow the doctrine of a particular religious sect, and that your ethnic group should not have the same rights as mine, do you think I would choose a popular group to get my foot in the door?

I need something emotional, a hot-button that you will agree to without thinking things through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. "It's about equal protection under the law and separation of religion
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 02:36 PM by kayell
and state." I agree on all that and that this has the potential to hurt people who have no idea that it applies to them.

But it is also a SERIOUS human and civil rights issue. Saying that gay marraige is not an important issue is to me like saying that "seperate but equal" education was not an important issue.

Yeah, the pukes are using it as a wedge issue, but damn, this is a VERY important issue for lots of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Equal rights is an important issue for everybody

And marriage is important for any two people who love each other and want to get married, I don't care what gender, or race, or religion they are or what they like on their pizza.

What I am saying is that whether you are straight, gay, independent or undecided, whether you think marriage is a fine thing or the root of all evil, this amendment is about you, your rights, and whether your elected representatives, your servants, who live like rich men while you struggle to keep a roof over your head believe that you should have the same rights as your neighbor.

In every state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Agreed, we are on the same page
If they take away rights for ANY group of people, as opposed to the history in this country of movement towards increasing rights, EVERYONE in this country is in for a world of hurt.


First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out — because I was not a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out — because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me —
and by then there was no one left to speak out for me.

German anti-Nazi activist, Pastor Martin Niemöller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL one day I'm going to spell his name at least half right

even if I never have the nerd skills needed to make an umlaut. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I cut and pasted it, I can't spell that name either
and the umlaut just went along for the ride. *hangs head in shame*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gula Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I still get tears in my eyes everytime I read this
As for the umlaut an ö is "alt 148"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. One involves PEOPLE - the other involves an object
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yes, but it's equally hypocritical.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ms_splash Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ha ha ha ha ha ha
That was a joke, right?

(we really have to get a special font for sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. it was a republican, Mitch McConnell,
that torpedoed the flag amendment last time. They wanted the wedge issue, but fortunately they had the good sense to leave the Constitution alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. What?
"Marriage is a religious institution and always has been.

It was designed to breed up children."

This is a joke is it not? What about living in sin if you have sex and don't get married? Sho

What about couples who marry and can't or don't want children? Should we live outside the laws and live in sin?

Think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The flag is an object, this is about ethics
As much as I detest Bush and his complete administration, I must agree for once with the impostor in the "Whitehouse".We have in this country three basic elements that defines our very existence. " THE BIBLE, THE CONSTITUTION and our " COMMON SENSE ". In explanation, the Bible gives us the sense of awareness and the balance between right and wrong. The CONSTITUTION gives us laws that enforce and defines the Bible. Our COMMON SENSE enables each and every individual to use the gifts of reasoning when there are conflicts between the previous two. The question is, which of these three are more valid than the other? The answer is "COMMON SENSE". It allows us to distinquish, examine and analyze any ramification that may occur in either.
We must look at a hidden agenda from those that wish to compare themselves to others of traditional values. We must look at our children, the impression and the effects it will have on them for a lifetime of ridicule and a society giving children a choice of identity as well as making the marriage of a MAN and WOMEN insignificant. Once marriage is redefined, adoption also will be redefined. Let us not forget, that once the PANDORAS box is open, we can't just say " OOP's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. buh-bye, grandmasue
I surely wish you hadn't been tombstoned. I'd've loved to have disabused you of your ignorance. (BTW ignorance = lack of knowledge, lack of facts)

Wanna discuss the facts? notheidi63@earthlink.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lets hope its just as important.
An issue that people dont care enough about to vote on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Is it going to solve the problems of ...
debt, war, loss of democracy and freedoms right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's the same distraction to divide us......
At election time instead of demanding real issues be addressed and supported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. mac2, can you explain how gay marriage is not a real issue, please?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottie72 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't you have this back wards?
Burning flags is one thing. We are talking about actually affecting the very lives of Millions of Americans with this amendment. This is is probably the most important issue of our time. It is a time when our government will be able to live up to its ideals or turn its back on its ideal. Thus taking one more step toward theocracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Both are equal to the right - they're diversions
They don't really care about the outcome, just that it takes the focus off the real crap they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's more important, myomy.
A flag has no rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yes, I agree with you, however the Rethugs
are experts at changing the subject to change the focus, which was my intention with this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. It is much more important..
..and I am afraid we are going to get clobbered with it.

I believe the idea that this issue could somehow hurt Bush more than the Democratic Party is a bad case of the sort of absolute politically tone deaf naivete I so often read here.

The majority of the American public DO NOT support gay marriage. The majority of the American public DO NOT like what they are seeing in San Francisco and Massachusetts.

Many Americans will not admit they support this discriminatory ammendment, but they really will. The majority of the public will support Bush on this, even more than the polls will indicate.

The only way Kerry and our party breaks even on this is to take an absolutely principled stand against this amendment in any form it might take.....and STICK TO IT. Any waffling whatsoever is going to be bad news for us.

This is a big wedge issue Bush and Co. are going to use like a baseball bat, and I suspect it will be a net winner for them.

If anyone had any doubt that this might be one of the nastiest campaigns in history, Bush's speech today ought to dispel that.

Imajika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I do not understand why people feel threatened by this,
My wife (female) and I (male) both wonder why love and happiness isn't the driving force here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. at the time, the majority of the american public did not support
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 04:52 PM by noiretblu
equal civil rights for ______________________________ just fill in the blank. the demoratic party needs to show some leadership on this issue, just as it has in the past on other civil rights issues. otherwise...why don't we just outlaw everything THE MAJORITY doesn't like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC