Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sierra Club is considering adopting anti-immigration policy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:13 PM
Original message
Sierra Club is considering adopting anti-immigration policy.
Sierra Club is a $95 million organization, and the right wing is doing what they've done to HRC and many other single issue liberal interest groups. They're trying to destroy them from within -- they'r trying to balkanize their issues and corrupt them with conservative goals that they think members will be suckers for (since they might have their single issue blinkers up). In this case, the anti-immigration issue is being sold as a population control issue.

So, get ready. I'm sure if this passes, you're going to see the Sierra Club endorsing Republicans who are anti-immigration, throw a few bones on the environment, but are totally down with transferring power to big corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently, this white supremacist guy...
Has been plotting to make this "takeover" move since 1986, by getting any and all nutcases supporting his agenda to join the Sierra Club and eat away at it from within, like colon cancer...

Believe it or not, his name's NOT, in fact, Grover Norquist!:eyes:

Maybe the Sierra Club needs our help--can anybody here post the number we should call to join? Years ago, I used to be a member of the Triangle (N.C.) Chapter--guess they need me back, now! :eyes:

Please help to keep the Sierra Club the wonderful, progressive environmental force it's always been...our land and our wildlife are counting on it!

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The deadline to join..
in time to vote in the election has already past -- I tried. :)

But, I did have a chance to warn every Sierra Club member I know about the nutters in their midst. They know who NOT to vote for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. What "white supremacist guy"?
Please name a name and provide a shred of evidence that he is a "white supremacist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sierra Club almost adopted this a few years back
I forget which year. It was narrowly defeated IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. population is a legitimate issue for an environmental org
overpopulation of humans is the greatest threat to our biosphere. US population growth is due to immigration. Americans are the biggest pigs on the planet. So, do I advocate mass deportations and a Maginot Line on our southern border? THe first would be cruel and the second stupid. Rather, US policy should be to promote human and economic rights worldwide. By impelling our corps to provide good wages, working conditions & environmental standards in their overseas operations. By conditioning our aid to governments on same and adoption of family planning(we need that in this country too!).
I don't think this is a left/right issue. Note that the repubs are ignoring their xenophobe wing, as the cheap labor portion of their party rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is that why
They advocate so strongly for family planning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. not quite sure
who they is, sierra or repubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Sierra Club
and I was being sarcastic to make the point that if overpopulation is the reasona an environmental organization is getting into the immigration debate, there are other issues that they needn't be avoiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. well, you know how it is about sarcasm around here
sometimes I think it needs a special font.......
but I think I agree with you, about enviro orgs. It seems that the movement is split into a gaggle of special interest groups which are not always mutually supportive and diffuses potential political power. Worse, people drop a small check in the mail and think they're environmentalist while they drive their SUV's, work in a polluting industry or otherwise engage in counterproductive activities. And don't get me started about the crisis of the month mailings.......
All those trees!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Adopting issues which help Republicans get elected isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Furthermore, if you want to slow down population growth,
elevate everyone to the middle class, let everyone have good jobs, with plenty of options and control over their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. obviously
but you're not going to do that as long as a massive pool of cheap labor exist to hold down wages. Even if we raise the minimum wage(as we should)illegals will provide a resourse to anti-american employers.
A related proplem I see is getting Americans to pay the higher prices than they are used to due to empire and exploitation.Somehow that will have to be done. The reality check is going to be tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here is a good website
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 10:43 PM by ldoolin
www.sierrademocracy.org

Good place to find out all about the Sierra Club upcoming election, and the disinformation circulating about it.

Here are a few facts:

Richard Lamm was Colorado's LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC governor and has a longtime strong environmental record. He has nothing to do with the right wing.

Doug LaFollette is Wisconsin's current LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC secretary of state. He has nothing to do with the right wing.

Paul Watson was a founder of Greenpeace, and the Sea Shepherd Society. He has nothing to do with the right wing.

The excessive amount of legal immigration going on has long been a concern of many mainstream environmentalists, as part of addressing the overpopulation issue. This has nothing to do with racism or the right wing.

Please stop buying into hysterical disinformation being put out by the likes of Morris Dees, who has gone completely off the deep end and needs to take a long retirement.

See also: www.susps.org , www.seashepherd.org , www.npg.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. yes, indeed. Stopping mass immigration is a LIBERAL issue
The cheap labor conservatives are the ones who want to shoehorn a billion people into America....the better to lower wages and increase GOP slumlord rents....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Very legit issue
Nothing at all wrong with shutting off the spigot. Shut down the borders for a few years, work on assimilation issues, deal with the problem open borders has created and then, maybe, it will be time again soon. But it IS time to put up the "No Vacancy" sign. This is not, as someone correctly pointed out, a left-right issue ---- this is an American issue.

It doesn't make a person "anti-immigrant" to recognize that there is a serious problem confronting California. Try this statistic relating to California: Of the increase of 4.2 million people during those 10 years, the net gain generated by the native population was just 90,000, fewer than attend each year's Rose Bowl game.
http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-growth04jan25,1,5397335.story?coll=la-headlines-magazine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Water supply is a huge issue in the West
& overpopulation increases the looming crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yes, turn the USA into a giant gated community....
Let the rest of the world go to hell. Too bad pollution doesn't respect borders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. who said anything about that?
please see post #4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC