Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time to talk about the platform: Health Care?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 07:42 AM
Original message
Time to talk about the platform: Health Care?
The platform is the where the Democrats can prove they do have some spine again. A health care plank is crucial, IMHO.

What should the health care plank consist of?

I am strongly in favor a single-payer, universal plan but I know it's a damn hard sell.

I also think the health care platform MUST endorse funding for embryonic stem-cell research.

Going to DC for the American Diabetes Associtation in May, so I'm keenly interested in what everyone thinks on these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Single-payer universal
is how they should go, but it won't happen.Just think how that would free up people to change jobs and in the end save businesses huge $. Except of course for the current health insurance companies and drug companies who are making such a handsome profit from today's failing system.

Speaking selfishly, they also need a platform that includes a policy on the nursing shortage that isn't just about increasing funding for education, but is concerned with WHY people leave this profession in DROVES! Howard Dean was the only candidate I know of who had a coherent policy on Nursing and now he's out.

People are under the mistaken impression that the doctor will be the one between them and an early demise....that is rarely the case. It's the nurse who monitors you 95% of the time in a hospital setting; which is pretty hard to do when you have to high a patient load, mandatory overtime, low wages, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Friend, I appreciate good nurses probably more than anyone!
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 08:09 AM by blondeatlast
I've had ample opportunity.

I have met some nurses that were worth their weight in gold, and I've known hundreds.

You are so right--that should be a crucail part of the plank. Thank you for pointing it out--and I WILL definitely discuss it when I get to DC.

The nurses who cared for my dad in his last days were absolutely incredible. I noted at the time that they were all nearing retirement age and could not stop thinking about it.

I am one who really knows the value of good nurses. Thank you for choosing to be a nurse. I'm well aware of the way you've been exploited.

Edit: almost forgot! WELCOME TO DU!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks!
I appreciate your support of nurses too!
And I've enjoyed many of your posts already!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. But if everyone says "it won't happen", then it will NEVER happen
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 08:41 AM by cryofan
Before it CAN happen, we first must say that it WILL happen.
THat's the first goddamn step!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. you're right of course...
but I didn't say "never". I just can't imagine "soon".

I guess being a part of the dismal trainwreck that is our current system has made me a little jaded. Every day I get to see the people who are making the current system work for their benefit and it's hard to imagine them letting change occur. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It will work--you are so right.
But only one candidate supports it now (even though many have been led to believe that their candidate does) so it will be hard to get it brought up for the platform.

We need to sell the idea to employers--with UHC, they can get out of the health insurance debacle. If the Dems can work on that, they can give us a sure winner on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Do you know there's an organization for medical personnel
who support universal uni-payer health care? (I just like using uni- a lot. :) )

From my understanding there are over 10,000 physicians members now.

I refuse to think it won't happen.... so much depends on it! Plus, my candidate supports it. :)

Have you seen the thread in GD comparing Canadian and USian coverage?

Welcome to Du, NC Nurse!

:hi: :hi: :hi:

:toast:

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh yeah! I should metion
that we need to connect the dots between the harm the chimp has done to environmental policies and the rise in chronic health problems...esp. in kids!

I am going to the EPA's meeting this week on RELAXING power company emission standards to let them spew more mercury into the air....which gets into the rain, the snow, our waterways and the fish we eat.

Mercury is highly toxic and can cause birth defects and neurological defects and disorders in children...the symptoms of mercury poisoning are almost identical to those of Autism. The CDC estimates that 1 of 12 women of childbearing age has unsafe levels of mercury in her blood.

This administration is going to do us all in if they get a chance with their stupid shortsighted @#$%^ policies! AAAAUGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. You know it--health care goes way beyond how it's paid for;
as you know better than anyone.

Give 'em hell, grrl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. here's one link
http://www.diabetesnet.com/news/news102900.php#Arsenic

It is commonly known that arsenic is an extremely toxic substance that can kill people if given in a strong enough dose. However, researchers are now trying to publicize the health risks associated with the low, but dangerous levels of arsenic that is common in tap water.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), exposure to low concentrations of arsenic over many years can lead to diabetes, anemia, reproductive disorders, and cancers of the skin, bladder, lungs, and prostate. The current congressional standard for the presence of arsenic in water is limited to no more than 50 parts per billion. However, the EPA hopes to lower this standard to no more than 5 parts per billion.

Bush did not lower the levels. At least 2 millions people in the last 3 years have been diagnosed with diabetes.

A second study has been done in Sweden that supports this theory.

http://infoventures.com/osh/abs/smlt0002.html

Data from a previous study on arsenic exposure and mortality at a copper smelter in Sweden were reexamined to investigate a possible association between diabetes mellitus and arsenic exposure. Death records for the years 1960 to 1976 in a parish in northern Sweden were used as the source of data. The authors conclude that the findings of this study provide some support for the suggestion that arsenic exposure could be an important factor in the development of diabetes mellitus.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippysmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Universal health care
It HAS to happen one way or another. This current piecemeal system cannot be sustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The key is selling its advantages to employers, IMHO.
I'm sure they would love to wash their hands of it--look at how many are cutting their contributions drastically. If the Dems can do this, they will help keep the power of the insurance companies out of the eqauation.

If we can look at it rationally we can defeat the insurance pigs at their own game.

As someone with a chronic health problem, this is THE ISSUE for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skippysmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Spot-on!
I would think that universal health care would benefit companies, who wouldn't have to foot the bill for health care AND wouldn't need so many HR people to manage benefits.

With so many workers changing jobs frequently, single payer makes the most sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Single-payer, universal
for 100% of America.

public, not private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Kick for the platform.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. One last kick before an untimely death...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. One thing you never hear anymore is about the
Patient's Bill of Rights. I think we ought to start pushing for it and make it so difficult for the for profit industries to make money that they will get out of the business and pave the way for a single payer universal system.

I propose:

No one can be denied health insurance for any reason, not pre-existing conditions, not age, not anything.

No one can be charged more than they are able to pay or means testing. Let's say no one has to pay more than 10% of their wages and if they aren't employed like children or elderly then they get it free.

Care givers, like Clinics, Medical Professionals and Hospitals are to be reimbursed at an agreed upon amount for each visit, procedure or test.

These are just off the top of my head. I'm sure many more rights can be added. Let's run those HMO's and Health insurance quacks out of Dodge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Where do we start?
Sounds like a good way to pressure from the bottom.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Well, when we know who the candidate will be, we will have to
start a letter writing campaign asking them to please put this on their platform. I mean we write to the Presidential candidate, the DNC and even the DLC. Maybe we can even target delegates to the convention, but I don't know how to go about that.

Actually, we could even remind the Bush that he had made some promises about a Patient's Bill of Rights. Everytime he is scheduled to be interviewed by CNN or other news whores we should write them to ask him why he hasn't kept his promise.

We have to get everyone talking about it again. I don't want a Republican plan of course, because it will be something to screw us over like the prescription drug giveaway.

But this issue has been swept under the rug and it needs to be dragged out again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You've been thinking about this a lot longer than I have
I guess what was in my mind was to keep pressuring the pols at the top (Pres, Senators, etc) for the one-payer system, and work on the Patient's Rights Bill separately, from the bottom.

Maybe another organization to head this.... what about that organization that people joined when they dropped out of AARP... dang, the mind has gone blank.

I don't know if this is the right way... just what came into my mind. Sort of two fronts at the same time.... One from the top, and one grassroots.

Tell me your thoughts...

And, thanks for continuuing to bring this up. I really think it has merit.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Get Howard Dean to to help!
He said he wants to help to win back the White HOuse. He's going to stay involved. He's accomplished a pretty good system in Vt. He's a Dr.

Ask for his help.

Remember he was also the candidate who said if he were to design a health care system from scratch, this is not it, but we need to start with what we have so we can get something passed congress.

He's right. Remember Hillary's program? It was crushed.

Idealism is wonderful, but if it can't get off the ground, it hasn't got a chance.

First, we need to get a Dem in the WH, then we need to take back congress, then we can talk about major change in a lot of systems including health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. This is why Dean was my candidate, but the old insider's system
took him down. I think it was the moderate DLC Democrats that did it IMHO so they could push their candidates in there that toe the DLC line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Hi napi!
Welcome to DU!

:hi: :hi: :hi:

:toast:


I was reticent to mention my candidate, because this is still GD. To get more specific, we'll have to move it to GD04.

I'm not so sure that Hillary's proposal tanked because it was too much too fast... it was, after all, still tied to insurance companies.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. Federal Insurer of last resort
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 03:39 AM by camero
That could be a precursor to UHC. The idea would be to create a pool for the uninsured much like it exists on the state level. The unemployed could be subsidized in this system. The states that have them could add to it or just recieve federal funds with federal standards. It's a start I guess.

My thoughts right now say it could be modeled on the insurance that Congress gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC