Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

this may be a dupe but did anyone hear how Bush intends to create

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:44 PM
Original message
this may be a dupe but did anyone hear how Bush intends to create
1000's of new jobs- by reclassifying Mcdonalds workers as production jobs? I heard it last evening on NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there a link or story for this
would be curious to see how/why he could do that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I did hear this on the radio last night
It would fit this administration's philosophy (although philosophy isn't a good word here because it implies thought occurs)to classify unskilled minimum wage labor as production. I seriously doubt they would be recommending wage raises to production class jobs though. How convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonDeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its was on Lou Dobbs friday. He was flabbergasted
as were all who watched the story. The same character who said is was a good thing outsourcing American jobs said it could be legitimate to reclassify McDonalds hamburger makers as production jobs. ROTFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. They seem determined to blow what little economic credibility they have
This one is blowing up in their faces. In any rational world, the idiot who thought this up would be fired. They make it sound as though we ship hamburgers off to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey! great idea.
Seriously this one should not be left to die. They may very well use this idea. If few enough people hear about it,it just might work for bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's the article that started all of the talk
David Cay Johnston is a Pulitzer winner.

from the article:

In the New Economics: Fast-Food Factories?
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

Published: February 20, 2004
Is cooking a hamburger patty and inserting the meat, lettuce and ketchup inside a bun a manufacturing job, like assembling automobiles?

That question is posed in the new Economic Report of the President, a thick annual compendium of observations and statistics on the health of the United States economy.
Advertisement

The latest edition, sent to Congress last week, questions whether fast-food restaurants should continue to be counted as part of the service sector or should be reclassified as manufacturers. No answers were offered.

In a speech to Washington economists Tuesday, N. Gregory Mankiw, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, said that properly classifying such workers was "an important consideration" in setting economic policy.

Counting jobs at McDonald's, Burger King and other fast-food enterprises alongside those at industrial companies like General Motors and Eastman Kodak might seem like a stretch, akin to classifying ketchup in school lunches as a vegetable, as was briefly the case in a 1981 federal regulatory proposal.

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Where was this published? Link? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It's the link in CatWoman's post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's pretty much all over the net...from the same guy who said outsourcing
was a good thing. Mankiw (sp?)?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. So, would new jobs actually be created?
or would they claim that they had "created" thousands of new jobs in the production sector just because they reclassified them? I'm still at a loss as to how that would create new jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. just read the article smells of presidential desperation
and must admit they have to be getting pretty damn desperate to think this one up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC