Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

War on Terrorism... a New Draft?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LosAngelesDemocrat Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:31 PM
Original message
War on Terrorism... a New Draft?
Anyone have info or specific information in regards to preparation of a new national draft? There has been rumors that the selective service and pentagon have been preparing for the eventuality of such a draft due to staffing problems in the volunteer military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Smart Borders (SSS) and Draft Bill S 89 IS
Go to Thomas web site and look it up. Link: http://thomas.loc.gov/
It looks like more than a Draft Bill. It give any President unlimited powers over citizen movements, service, etc.

"US Preparing for Military Draft in Spring 2005
> by Adam Stutz
> Vancouver IndyMedia - Wednesday January 28, 2004 at 09:50 AM
>
> http://www.vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/105146.php
>
> The current agenda of the US federal government is to reinstate the
> draft in order to staff up for a protracted war on "terrorism."
>
> Pending legislation in the House and Senate (twin bills S 89 and HR
> 163) would time the program so the draft could begin at early as
> Spring 2005 -- conveniently just after the 2004 presidential election!
>
> Reinstatement of the draft
>
> Dear Friends and Family,
>
> I urge you to read the article below on the current agenda of the
> federal government to reinstate the draft in order to staff up for a
> protracted war on "terrorism."
>
> Pending legislation in the House and Senate (twin bills S 89 and HR
> 163) would time the program so the draft could begin at early as
> Spring 2005 -- conveniently just after the 2004 presidential election!
> But the administration is quietly trying to get these bills passed
> NOW, so our action is needed immediately. Details and links follow.
>
> If voters who currently support U.S. aggression abroad were confronted
> with the possibility that their own children or grandchildren might
> not have a say about whether to fight, many of these same voters might
> have a change of mind. (Not that it should make a difference, but this
> plan would among other things eliminate higher education as a shelter
> and would not exclude women -- and Canada is no longer an option.)
>
> Please send this on to all the parents and teachers you know, and all
> the aunts and uncles, grandparents, godparents.... And let your
> children know -- it's their future, and they can be a powerful voice
> for change! Please also write to your representatives to ask them why
> they aren't telling their constituents about these bills -- and write
> to newspapers and other media outlets to ask them why they're not
> covering this important story.
>
>
> The Draft*
>
> $28 million has been added to the 2004 Selective Service System (SSS)
> budget to prepare for a military draft that could start as early as
> June 15, 2005. SSS must report to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the
> system, which has lain dormant for decades, is ready for activation.
> Please see website: http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view
> the SSS Annual Performance Plan - Fiscal Year 2004.
>
> The Pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to fill all 10,350
> draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots nationwide..
> Though this is an unpopular election year topic, military experts and
> influential members of Congress are suggesting that if Rumsfeld's
> prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan > permanent state of war on "terrorism"] proves accurate, the U.S.

> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5146.htm
>
> Congress brought twin bills, S. 89 and H.R. 163 forward this year,
> entitled the Universal National Service Act of 2003, "To provide for
> the common defense by requiring that all young persons in
> the United States, including women, perform a period of military
> service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national
> defense and homeland security, and for other purposes." These active
> bills currently sit in the Committee on Armed Services.
>
> Dodging the draft will be more difficult than those from the Vietnan era remember. College and Canada will not be options. In December 2001, Canada and the US signed a "Smart Border Declaration," which
> could be used to keep would-be draft dodgers in. Signed by Canada's
> Minister of Foreign Affairs, John Manley, and US Homeland Security
> Director, Gov. Tom Ridge, the declaration involves a 30-point plan
> which implements, among other things, a "pre-clearance agreement" of> people entering and departing each country. Reforms aimed at making> the draft more equitable along gender and class lines also eliminates > higher education as a shelter. Underclassmen would only be able to postpone service until the end of their current semester. Seniors would have until the end of the academic year."

Vote for a anti-war candidate. Call your Senator and tell them this is a dangerous bill. It could lead to tyranny using the draft bill to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Santorum?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC