Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it morally reprehensible to lie about your vote when asked?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is it morally reprehensible to lie about your vote when asked?
OK, I'll try to keep this as nonpartisan as possible.

November 2004. Son is just back from the voting booth. Father voted earlier in the day. He asks, "So, son, who did you vote for?" Son knows father will become a PITA if he tells the truth. So he lies. "Of course I voted for XYZ, just like you said, Dad."

Is that lie morally reprehensible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Votes should be public..
Because your concience should be clear when you vote..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
What's the big deal if people know who you vote for. Stand up and defend your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. did you ever hear of the concept of the 'secret ballot'????
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I've heard of it
I always thought it was stupid though.

It just seems to be for chickens.

"Sure I voted against that cut for the rich!" (secretly voted for it)

It seems the only people who need it are those who are engaging in deceit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah, real stupid
Because I know I want crazy fundamentalist bosses to know who their employees voted for. I know I want liberals in the Bible Belt to be exposed every time they voter for liberal candidates.

Peer pressure is not something that belongs in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No, it doesn't
but aren't that why there are laws to stop that sort of crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've heard of it
I always thought it was stupid though.

It just seems to be for chickens.

"Sure I voted against that cut for the rich!" (secretly voted for it)

It seems the only people who need it are those who are engaging in deceit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It helps keep corrupt politicians with money
from buying votes.

This was a problem in the 19th C. in municipal elections, IIRC.

That is where the $2 bill became unpopular, though that may be an urban legend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toxictoaster Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Disagree
Too much potential for intimidation, cohersion, etc.

This country votes secretly, and has for a long time. It's one of the few things about government that should be kept secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Hi Toxictoaster!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's morally reprehensible
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 08:26 PM by Cat Atomic
for a father to assume he owns his child's vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Your vote, your business...
no one else has the right to know... I'm still debating whether to tell my Air Force veteran Republican voting father who recently found Jesus that his son the Army combat arms veteran and avowed agnostic votes for Democrats. I just don't bring any of it up, but if asked I would have to tell him the truth. Thats just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nope. It's an immoral question.
It's like asking how much money you make, how old you are, or how much you weigh.

If it's impolite to ask it's not impolite to lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winnah!
"If it's impolite to ask it's not impolite to lie."

You, Dr., just made my DU Quote Collection. See sig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's no one's business.
If someone has the nerve to intimidate and interrogate others about their votes, then they deserve whatever answer (or insult) that comes next.

I'm not ashamed of how I vote, but I don't have to answer to anyone else about my ability to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Demanding to know how someone voted is rude...
The proper response is "Why do you ask?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Even that, depending on occasion, may be giving too much.
Edited on Sat Feb-21-04 02:49 PM by JCCyC
e.g. openly wingnut boss querying employee. In this case, the only sane answer is "Republican, sir!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marymarg Donating Member (773 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Inappropriate questions
do not demand honest answers. Believing this, I was one of those who was not outraged by President Clinton's "lie."

I just think that are questions that only reflect the ignorance or ill-will of the inquisitor and are not worthy of an answer, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Given some of the attacks on DU
I've come to the conclusion that there are things here I wouldn't be forthcoming about... to save myself hassles.

Too bad it comes to that.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. naive question
what's a "PITA"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Shorthand for "pain in the arse". (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. deleted by sweetheart (dupe)
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 08:46 AM by sweetheart
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
22. Do you realize your position is against human rights? (reply to post 1)
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 08:45 AM by sweetheart
A lot of things were learned from world war 2 regarding black
listing and destroying minority populations... as the lessons are
encoded in the human rights code the world knows today.

Likely they were wise to make ballots secret.

Here is the article from the United Nations human rights declaration:

Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his
country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of
government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine
elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall
be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting
procedures.



http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC