|
This was at the Edwards blog...worth reposting...it cites its sources.
U.S. wealth distribution is extremely concentrated, much more so than income. <1998 data from The State of Working America 2000/2001, Economic Policy Institute. Current distribution and of wealth is much more unequal, as it has been substantially accelerating under the Bush tax, budget, and regulatory regimes. > Percent of wealth owners, percent of total wealth, average wealth of class 0.5% 26% (not available) 1% 34% $10,200,000 5% 57% $1,400,000 10% 69% $623,000 20% 82% $345,000 bottom 20% n/a -$8,900 The bottom 80% of wealth owners now own less than 15% of this country’s wealth. 96% of all common stocks are owned by the top 20%. I'm interested in this 85+% of the wealth sequestered in the top-20-percenters' assets because, while this is the supposed “investor class,” the effect of their “investments” is a generation-long decrease in the overall U.S. and global quality of life. Bush's tax-based legacy to the rich, just his tax-based legacy, is around $2 trillion (nine zeros), and growing. That doesn't even count his budgetary and regulatory largesse. God forbid wealth would flow-not-trickle down into local infrastructure projects that would provide full livelihood incomes and safety nets for the 80% of us who are now scraping over our meager share — less than 15% — of this country's wealth. Just $1 trillion can be visualized as billion dollar grants to 1000 cities with which each could build 10,000 $100,000 homes, which they could rent for $500 per month and derive enough income to maintain and grow that housing stock 5% annually (500+ per year new houses). That's giving 30,000,000 in-debt individuals (and an additional 1.5 million people per year) an opportunity not to have to pay 50% of their income for housing. Oh, and for every $1 invested in construction, at least $3 are leveraged into local economies. So, in addition to the 500+ new houses built in each city in each outyear, there's an annual injection of $150 million in productive activity in each local economy.
|