Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What defines a true "conservative"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:05 PM
Original message
What defines a true "conservative"?
I'm in another email debate with some friends. They consider themselves republicans, though I don't know that they truly understand why. Anyway, I sent them to the http://www.presidentmatch.com and low and behold their candidate was *.

But I believe there's a disconnect between * and true conservatives, and began trying to figure out what makes a conservative. Here is my initial thought and response:

Look, I don't have a problem with conservative issues - I happen to agree with many of them. What I do have a problem with is the people in this administration claiming to be conservative when they are clearly aren't.

True conservatives are fiscally responsible and do not believe in imperialistic foreign policy. True conservatives stand by the separation of church and state. True conservatives do not support invasion of privacy, nor do they accept that civil rights must be sacrificed in the name of security. True conservatives believe in smaller government.

Yet when you look at the last three years, Bush can claim NONE of these things. The deficit and national debt are out of control (congratulations, we just surpassed 7 TRILLION in debt with no end in sight). We have invaded a country that clearly WAS NOT a threat to the United States, and was barely a threat to its neighbors. Today we are witnessing an assault on church-state separation, which would be humorous if it weren't so troubling, since this is the very thing "we" decry in Islamic countries. The Patriot Act ignores the Constitution, and would not have prevented 9/11. The necessary tools were already in place, and if somebody in the administration had been paying attention (rather than ignoring things for the first 9 months), perhaps 9/11 could have been prevented. And finally, government is actually LARGER now than it was at the end of the Clinton administration.


Am I off-base on this? I probably left out something on the environment, but what else is missing/incorrect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. A true conservative is flexible.
How else would you explain all of them walking around with their heads up their asses?

/silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I laughed out loud at that Blue-Jay !!!
A real guffaw !!!! I can't wait to use it !!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waylon Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ive made similar arguments...
Im always accused of taking liberties with the facts. Exaggeration seems to be the tool of rebuttal.

Make good points, thats all you can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like you nailed all the facts.
Which means, of course, they will either not reply, or claim you're just a "Bush hater."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Selfishness. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm trying to differentiate between
conservatives, republicans, and neoconservatives. I don't know that selfishness is conservative - it may be more the other two...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Actually, I think you nailed it.
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 01:08 PM by Blue-Jay
They're MEpublicans, for the most part. Think about it:

Tax cut: YAY! Me me me me!
Health Care: What the..?!? Not ME! I have insurance. Fuck those "other" people!

and so on......

It's patently selfish and short-sighted. Really, how hard is it to understand that the nation and it's people are more important than an extra few bucks in your pocket?

If I may quote the great philosopher, Mister Spock: The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. (yeah, I'm a geek, but it's rarely been said better than that, so shut up) :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think being moralistic is a prime requisite
Every Conservative I know is quite sanctimonious. Also I believe the capacity for hypocrisy has to be high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hammie Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. A true political conservative
Is one who believes in a very strict reading of the constitution. They tend favor strong local government and a limited federal government. They would agree that state funded welfare programs are legal (depending on the state constitution) even if they don't happen to agree with them, but become apoplectic at the thought of the same program implemented by the federal government. They are most likely to self identify with the Libertarian party.

I would say you have a better change of running into a communist than a true conservative. The latter seem to prefer living in sparsely populated western states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Before you define what a conservative believes in, you have to
define conservatism itself.

The dictionary definition and the definition commonly used in political science is that conservatives favor the status quo, liberals favor progressive change, reactionaries wish to revert to previously existing conditions, and radicals want major, rapid change.

Because conservatives exist across ALL spectrums (there are liberals in Iran's fundamentalist clergy, and there were conservatives in the USSR's Politburo), you must first define the circumstances. The founding fathers of the US were among the most liberal thinkers in the world at the time, but modern conservatives don't reject their thinking as 'liberal' now, because what was liberal in 1789 is commonly accepted by almost every conservative in the US today.

A conservative in 1776 wanted to remain with Britain. Liberals (more appropriately, radicals) wanted to split with Britain.

After the war, conservatives wanted an American monarch. Liberals favored democracy.

Before the civil war, conservatives supported slavery. Liberals wanted it ended.

No conservative in his right mind now supports reunification under a British king today, or supports monarchy over democracy, or supports slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wadestock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Historically.....
You don't have to look much past the 1900s to the present...

As our country moved into the industrial age, republicans became affiliated with and championed business.

Democrats began to increasingly take a stand for unions and the worker to counter the obvious unfairness that was growing in a capitalistic industrialized society.

The most significant move by the democrats after the great depression was to champion the progressive tax system. Few understand the importance of this. During the depression the problem was analogous in some ways to what is happening today....too much money was going to the top....only back then it especially stifled cash flow at the bottom.

The progressive tax system in combination with government programs IS the appropriate formula for a capitalistic system.

A capitalistic system, by its very design, moves money to the top....it is a statistical inevitability. The progressive tax not only moderates/controls this self-destructive nature of capitalism but it provides for a healthy middle class and reduces the potential gulf between the rich and the poor. A healthy middle class is GOOD for business. Try to explain this to a ditto head.

Now enter Ronald Reagan.
This was the final chapter to redefine an ideology.
Up till this point the GOP was searching for legitimate ideals. If you're not for the working man....what exactly can you champion?

Reagan put together a new neat and sugar coated message. You earn the money....you deserve to keep it.
Translation....the rich get the money and the capitalistic system goes into tilt mode. The profit making turned up looked good at first.

Enter new corporate ethics, strategies for corporate profit making that don't include concern for the people, buyouts, mergers, etc....and a development of a culture of unethical capitalism.....all quite happily endorsed as nirvana by the new breed of Reaganites.

You don't necessarily have to blame Reagan but the Limbaughs et al that jumped on this bandwagon and notched it up to the level of the absurd. 25 years later, we have striking evidence of a capitalistic system that is out of control, with its public living beyond its means and corporations by and large not serving the interests of the people.

But to specifically answer your question...the average republican doesn't really stand for anything. They endorse capitalism and business...but they don't understand how to make "good" business.

Here's a rough approximation of what the real Republican base consists of:

25% anti-abortionists, gun nuts, and generally anyone considered macho/country lovin knuckle head that simply doesn't have the time to listen to reason. Don't you god dam liberals tell me what to do.
Actually many of these

50% truly believe that Reagan and Limbaugh is correct, that pure profits and growth are the only true outputs of a capitalistic society. These are hard working Americans that generally like the American work ethic and don't want anyone to get a "free ride".

25% money loving, unpatriotic scum bags that want to use the system to further themselves doing anything they can possibly squeeze out of it. They'd sell the country itself (and are in the process of doing it) if it meant an extra buck in their pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Taxes and Jobs
two main issues for my Grandparents who are
life long republicans .

They will not be voting for bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Would a Republican approve a tax increase to ban abortion?
Personally, I bet if it came down to paying higher taxes and banning abortion, they'd vote with their wallets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC