Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Definitions of NASCAR & NASCAR Dads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Wells Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:12 PM
Original message
Definitions of NASCAR & NASCAR Dads
NASCAR: a sport (sic) that glorifies reckless endangerment, ego-maniacally competitive road rage; encouragement of the widespread waste of a finite, heavily polluting natural resource; driving in circles like a dogs chasing their tails.

NASCAR Dads: Type A male who reveres motorized speed as a means of bolstering a sagging ego; often demands unquestioning obedience and subservience from family members. The average NASCAR Dad is employed in the automotive field, (trucking and delivery, maintenance, fueling, sales, misc motorized travel). The inate insecurity of their occupations produces the outward manifestation of recklessness and often leads to family violence and battering.

Resident DUHbya promotes NASCAR the same way Bill Gates promotes computers: in his own interest and those of his corporate cronies who profit from our addiction to automobiles.

The automobile is the central means by which the elite maintain their position at the top of the economic ladder, and, maintain they're control over all, local to global, economic structures of societal livelihoods.

The Bush Klan have been among the "induced automobile-dependency" conspirators since WW1. It's a very Skull n' Bones kind of thing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. And those same Nascar fans
boed the Resident in Chief....

Think about this for a second ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes they did. I never believed that NASCAR was a......
"Republican Sport" as Country Music IS "Republican Music".

NASCAR has a diverse fan base, particularly in when it comes to
politics.

Country "Music" on the other hand is clearly the choice of
reich wing men who demand that their women be servient to them.
That's why they did not like the Dixie Chicks, they disobeyed
DAS MAN.

Let's not ridicule NASCAR, it's not Country "Music" afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uhhh, is this sarcasm or something?
"The automobile is the central means by which the elite maintain their position at the top of the economic ladder, and, maintain they're control over all, local to global, economic structures of societal livelihoods."

?

"The average NASCAR Dad is employed in the automotive field, (trucking and delivery, maintenance, fueling, sales, misc motorized travel)."

Either back that up or call it an opinion. Besides, aren't these the working people that the Democratic party purports to try and represent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. re: the importance of NASCAR dads in '04 fad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. unbelievable
The average NASCAR Dad is employed in the automotive field, (trucking and delivery, maintenance, fueling, sales, misc motorized travel). The inate insecurity of their occupations produces the outward manifestation of recklessness and often leads to family violence and battering.

What nauseating classist bullshit.
How depressing to see this stuff here.

Do you really think that men in certain professions are more likely to 'batter'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speed8098 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. This thread sucks
I've alerted the mods.

If you don't like Nascar, that's fine, but to degrade those who do, is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. That officaly takes the prize..
For the absolutely most moronic post I have ever seen on a message board in my whole life. Anywhere.

Congratulations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Locking
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. If you start a thread in the General Discussion forum, you must present your opinion in a manner that is not inflammatory, which respects differences in opinion, and which is likely to lead to respectful discussion rather than flaming. Some examples of things which should generally be avoided are: unnecessarily hot rhetoric, nicknames for prominent Democrats or their supporters, broad-brush statements about groups of people, single-sentence "drive-by" thread topics, etc.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

3. The subject line of a discussion thread may not include profanity or swear words, even if words or letters are replaced by asterisks, dashes, or abbreviations.

4. The subject line and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation.

5. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

6. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC