Scarborough repukes say democrats too negative. wahh

[MIMStigator]

Frank Luntz said democrats are too negative and people won't like it and they should stop being so mean to *

HE WISHES

Why does Frankie think * has 47% approval rating???
Maybe he meant democrats should stop being mean to * or * will LOSE.

[still_one]

1. The pugs on Scarborough are trying to divide the Democrats

They aren't going to succeed. In fact I have never seen a more united party!

[polmaven]

2. The one exchange they picked on

with The Rev, was, I thought, in the top 3 moments of the debate!

Gawd, I certainly hope Al stays in this to the convention! He can, of course, tell it like it is in that way more than the others, 'cause he isn't really in it to be president, but to do just that...tell it like it is.

He is just terrific! I love him!

[Eric J in MN]

4. Al Sharpton's words were better in context, following

Al Sharpton's words were better in context, following Dennis Kucinich's statement that he reviewed pre-war intelligence and didn't see evidence of wmd in Iraq.

[polmaven]

6. Oh, sure, of course they were.

I didn't mean to take away from what DK said.

But when the Rev. started going on about not knowing he was lying but was lying, and about some crazy psychological problem, I thought I was going to bust a gut. I called my 84 year old mum and we laughed and agreed those were the best lines to that point.

[Bronco69]

3. Whenever bush* is on the ropes

the Dems are being too negative, but let President Clinton get a bj and all's fair. Go figure.

[Eric J in MN]

5. Scarborough was implying that some Democrats won't vote for Kerry because

Scarborough was implying that some Democrats won't vote for Kerry because they're too upset by hearing Kucinich and Sharpton say Bush is a liar.

I doubt that will be a problem.

[eleny]

7. He spent every tv appearance ragging on Clinton

when he was in Congress. So I almost did a spit-take when I heard Scar say that.

[disenfranchised]

8. I agree with them.

I hate Bush more than I ever imagined hating another human being. But, perpetually slamming Bush will turn off the independent voter. I really would want to know what is right about John Kerry not what is wrong with George Bush.

[LoZoccolo]

9. This is one of my favorite smileys.

:nopity:

[eleny]

14. Mine, too - So let me join you in a duet!

:nopity:

[Bob3]

10. Well I like it - I'm a people doesn't that count?

Hey this is an election year. God what sissy marys.

[Jade Fox]

11. Do you ever notice how conservatives....

are master guilt-trippers, forever playing the punative, critical parent to liberals,
explaining patiently what is wrong with our behavior and how we should
act?

Makes me want to :nuke:

[tabasco]

12. Boo hoo hoo poor wittle chickenhawks !!!!

The way they cry you'd think they had to go in the military or something. I am FIGHTING MAD at the MURDERERS in the White House. The Democrats better be FIGHTING MAD about this war and if it gives a couple people heartburn, TOUGH ! Somebody has to fight for our troops!

[raysr]

13. What's positive?

What the hell can anybody say positive about Bush? (w/o lying of course)

[kodi]

15. punch a bully in the nose and watch him cry.

that's all the repukes are, bullies who can dish it out but whine like babies when their ugly salvos are returned in kind.

already they are planting in the public pysche the frame work of "dems are mean people" & "repubs are friendly, set upon people."

this setting of the frame work is the essential feature of the campaign. whoever succeeds best in framing the opposition's "personality" wins in november.

each time the repukes complain about democratic campaign ugliness the dems have to fire back examples of past repuke smears.....and complain about it, jsut like the gop has recently.