Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush/AWOL story is not the real story. Or where Bush was and when

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:10 PM
Original message
The Bush/AWOL story is not the real story. Or where Bush was and when
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 03:11 PM by NNN0LHI
The real story is that some guys served their country when their country called, and other guys like Bush grabbed the first "Get Out Of Vietnam Free Card" they could grab. That is the real story here. And that is enough. The Rethugs can't win this battle with two Chickenhawks as their candidates for President and VP. Can't get around that. There is no way. The Rethugs are in big trouble and the best part of it is that they know it. Even the media can't save them on this one. This is truly a black and white issue that everyone understands. Even Rush Limbaugh's (another Chickenhawk by the way) listeners can easily understand this issue.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. My family can't understand it.
I think they'll support Shrub no matter what he does. They hated Clinton for the affair(s), but forgive and forget when Ah-nold did even worse things. The die-hard Repubs aren't going to vote Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. See what happens as it eats at them for months and months on end n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. No but maybe they will just stay home and not vote
It is going to be tough for anyone to vote for the Bush* Cabal and not shudder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Swing voters ...

The one's on the fringes will pretty much ALWAYS vote either Republican or Democrat. The swing voters are the target audience.

If KERRY would come out for repealing NAFTA and WTO, that could be the wedge issue that would pry a lot of lifelong Republicans out of Bush's camp. Bush simply CANNOT oppose free trade. His $200 million dollar war chest comes from free-traders (rapists of the US Middle Class).

Kerry can also show that he isn't just some rich ass-hole (a common perception) by showing that he isn't beholden to the interests who are seeking to DEMOLISH the US Middle Class.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luvpurp Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The die-hard repubs don't need to vote Dem
If they aren't enthused about Bush, they will stay home in droves come next November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. that's a dangerous assumption
die hard republicans will always vote. They see it as their duty. They'll go out of their way to vote.

It's the Dems, who if they aren't totally enthused by something, who will stay home. This is what worries me. That even though most people hate Shrub, a significant number of them won't vote anyway.

Always assume the repubs will vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Repeat after me: Repugs ALWAYS vote.
You are correct maggrwaggr, those chumps always vote. And they always vote the party line. Whether it's doing God's work or fighting for the Gipper, they'll vote. Those who think otherwise are in for a sad lesson.

We have to fight tooth and nail for the middle. That's where this election will be won or lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Hi Luvpurp!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
just_saying Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. No the real story here is "Conviction for Cocaine Possesion"
...the press is just letting it bleed out so that the WH can hang themselves with their own rope. Read the transcript from todays WH press conference on Josh Marshall's page:

www.talkingpointsmemo.com

this has all been speculated on before, and the WH's non-denial today sort paints that picture, doesn't it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hey McClellan: JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION!
Geez. I haven't seen this much dancing since I saw the Rockettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It looks like someone swallowed the canary
From that link above, and thanks again

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
"Scott McClellan: Can I walk through this?

Q: It's a very legitimate question.

Scott McClellan: And I want to back up and walk through this a little bit. Let's talk about the issue that came up, because this issue came up four years ago, it came up four years before that -- or two years before that, it came up four years before that --

Q: Did my question come up four years ago, and was it handled?

Scott McClellan: Helen, if you'll let me finish, I want to back up and talk about this --

Q: Don't dance around, just give us --

Q: It's a straightforward question.

Q: Let's not put too fine a point on it. If I'm not mistaken, you're implying that he had to do community service for criminal action, as a punishment for some crime?

Q: There are rumors around, and I didn't put it in that way. I just --
(snip)

To me it sounds like they are having a lot more discussions then they are letting on about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. "I want to back up and...", same line used by Busboy. repeatedly, on MTP
hadn't caught that in earlier reads.....memos all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Let me see if I got this right
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 05:35 PM by JellyBean1
Convicted felons were removed from voter eligibility in Florida, a state where *Bush's brother is the Governor, winning the 2000 election due to the electoral votes provided by Florida.

A state where it was ruled by the state judiciary that felons from out of state cannot have their voter eligibility removed because of crimes committed out of state.

The state of Texas provided a list of felons to Florida for the purge by a Texas company that has Officers close to *Bush's political group?

The state of Texas purged *Bush's own records of a felony conviction.

And *Bush himself is a felon?

Well, if this isn't grounds for an impeachment, I don't know what is.

And now we have a Texas company thats supplying the voting machings for 2004 election? And send some Marshals to Texas to find out what the hell is going on there.

Somebody better get some voting injunctions now. In all the states that have the new voting machines.

Its too bad the SOB cannot be impeached.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Hi just_saying!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. A different take on it:
The public now knows that Bush* lied to invade a country for reasons they don't comprehend. Lots of people are getting killed and maimed. And worst of all (for the Murkin public), its costing LOTS AND LOTS of money to "rebuild some Muslim country(?!?!)" Not what they were told. Not at all.

Accordingly, we see what I like to call the "Nixon Effect". Nixon was elected to his first term promising that he had a "secret plan" to end the Vietnam War. Yippee thought everyone. Great. Trouble is, he didn't end it, he escalated it by bombing Cambodia and Laos and sending more troops. People got pissed that they were lied to. Watergate was a great excuse to run him out of office on a rail for the Vietnam lie, with the helpful added bonus that the country could pretend they weren't wrong for believing his Vietnam lie.

Bush Lied and Everyone Knows It. He is spending our treasure and killing and maiming out citizens for his lie and it is NOT as promised. The public won't admit they were wrong to support Smirk and the war. Its too painful. However, if Smirky can get caught with this TANG/Coke/CommunityService stuff, after swaggering around on an aircraft carrier in a flyboy suit, the public will gladly toss him to the wolves....in truth because he lied about Iraq and they were foolish enough to believe him, but this TANG mess will give them an excuse they can pretend not to have known about. Public wasn't "wrong to support the war"...they get to boot his silly ass out because of TANG.

Nixon Effect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Campaign commercial

One should be done to the tune of "Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies" with Bush telling all his lies in front of it. The is a nice one for "MoveOn.org".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Great idea Taeger!
Fleetwood Mac would undoubtedly let them use the song free of charge too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Real story is recent lies and cover-up caused by AWOL
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 03:30 PM by mouse7
It's been proven continually in US political history that the voter will tolerate almost any behavior that isn't lied about/ It's the lies to cover-up the behavior that always end up nailing the person.

I'd focus on what the GOP recently has done to lie and cover-up the AWOL incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjanpundt Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Lies always get found out somehow
I've always wondered what would have happened if Clinton had said "yeah I had an affair with that woman, but now it's over". My guess is that the majority of people wouldn't have given a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ack - "xxx is not the Real Story, the Real Story is..."
That there are so many embarrassing stories about Bush that hardly any voter have heard...yet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. will the Media vet healthcare, jobs, education, needed infrastructure
before election day?

I'm sure they'll keep us focus and informed of the real issues.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yea, but they call Clinton a chickenhawk too.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Too bad for the Rethugs he is not running for president. Oh well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. What possible difference does it make what they call Clinton....
...at this point in time? How does that affect the 2004 election since Clinton isn't running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC