anyone know if this is real?

[shooga]

anyone know if this is real?





anyone know if this is real?

[skypilot]

1. All I get is a tripod.com logo...

...it looks pretty real to me.:)

[EstimatedProphet]

2. There's nothing there

[NWHarkness]

3. Tripod blocks image sharing.

[Catherine Vincent]

4. can you describe what it is?

[shooga]

11. let's try it this way ..

...

.... link


http://formenonly.tripod.com/awoltorndocument.html

[SheepyMcSheepster]

5. if you right click on the link and go to propertis, then cut and paste the

url into your address bar, you can view the image.

h ttp://formenonly.tripod.com/torndocumentawol.jpg

or copy this ^ line and take the space out of "h ttp"

[RobertSeattle]

6. The original version has been found or released

Go to www.calpundit.com - he seems to have the most details.

[Another Bill C.]

7. I believe that's the torn document

that was produced a few years ago to "prove" the shrub had shown up in 1972-1973. There's nothing on the page to show that it actually belongs to him, though.

[fob]

8. That's the "torn" document with dates bush* "served"

Problem is the dates were said to start with Nov 29 and Dec 14 1972, but the UNTORN version has surfaced and the actual dates are Oct 29 and Nov 14 which don't jive with the story the bush*camp told.

[shooga]

12. please explain

you lost me ... problem for whom

I agree ... there is no SS number or name on the photo of the doc ... does look a little shaky

[RobertSeattle]

9. Here's a great source of Bush Documents

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm

[VOX]

10. Good link. Thanks! n/t