Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Niger was a nudge, not a noose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:27 AM
Original message
Niger was a nudge, not a noose
Bush was doing something that made someone unhappy. All the Niger evidence was from before the war. It was brought out after the war because Bush messed something up for someone. His administration's disorganization and bumbling after the criticism shows how unexpected it was. He expected to get a free pass on it at the time, obviously--and why not? So now that he's been nudged, will he fix the problem? If not, he may get taken down. I wonder what the problem was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have no idea
I don't believe conspiracy thoeries at all, but if you are interested, go to this site:

www.fromthewilderness.com

It claims that the world financial powerbrokers have decided to remove Bush from office and that it's only a matter of time. The real question, according to this site, is not whether Bush is going to reach his downfall, but rather when--ie before or after the election.

I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but maybe the article on that site called "Beyond Bush" might help you.

Again I don't trust the source and think it to be based on conspiracy theories, but you might able to find something worthwhile, although I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, it's Occam's razor at this point
Why now, unless Bush did something to warrant the criticism? All the evidence existed before. It took them a few months to get their criticsms good and ready? Why do you think this is the case? Do you have an explanation for why the criticism is so limited, when other inaccuracies/exaggerations exist in the SOTU, and other speeches besides?

I'm open to a non-conspiracy theory, but the simplest explanation is that it was a nudge. The people who think this is the end are just so starved for criticism they take a nudge for a noose--they aren't hanging him yet, as the past weeks have shown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe because of the rising deaths in Iraq of US Soldiers?
Maybe some key individual in the Bush administration couldn't deal with it anymore. Maybe someone there was tired of what Bush was doing or had concerns. And something pushed him over the edge.

Or maybe because 1-2 US Soldiers are dying per day the media is more concerned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That could be; even so, the criticism is strangely limited (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Also the process is slower here
You also have the post-9/11 boom that Bush had. The media and people felt that in the aftermath of 9/11 that the country "needed to put internal criticism aside". And maybe that is why this only now is becoming news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC