Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shut up! ALERT! White House Goes Orange Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:05 AM
Original message
Shut up! ALERT! White House Goes Orange Again
This is so tedious.

"Only terror scare's when approval ratings' slumping."

That's right, the Janet Jackson Breast is no longer distracting anyone from AWOL and the rest, so it's time once again to go Orange! Orange!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. But....
...I thought that America was safer now that we captured Saddam. You mean he lied? Please Georgeie, Say it aint so? <sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. what excuse are they using this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Probably the old favorite: "Chatter!"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. His butt-cheeks are chattering all right
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yawn
I can't believe anyone pays any attention to that stupid thing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Something will come up ... can't let AWOL dominate another news weekend
Look, look, I saw a woman's breast on TV.

I think I'm going to fai....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. FOR REAL?
Seriously....Are we really?

The POS gives a nukes are everywhere speech yesterday and now today they bump up their asinine color alert chart (or whatever the hell that thing is)

AMAZING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. a re-post, but........... a plausible scenerio?
Will FEAR Work Again? (Bush to speak on WMD/nukes)

HATE, FEAR and IGNORANCE, the real Bush Trifecta, is about to be trotted out yet again.

Having failed at everything he’s touched he has nothing left but to terrify and distract. He’ll be getting plenty of help from the corporate media.

The cable whores will (reluctantly) divert their attention from MichaelMarthaScottPetersonStewertJackson to pander to images of armageddon in your own back yard.

And then something scary will happen.

No, I don’t believe another actual attack. Failing to protect the homeland against WMD or a terrorist event would be fatal to the bushies–unless it facilitated marshall law.

What they need is a domestic success in the “War on Terror” so watch for an attack being prevented by the bushies ‘superior intelligence’ and steely resolve. Manufacturing one would be child’s play.

The people will respond with renewed FEAR (which had been lessened to near apathy by the sequence of ‘chicken little’ alerts, duct tape, and the ridiculous color codes).

Their HATE will be re-focused on the terrorists (which will be loosely defined as anyone who doesn’t do what the US tells them to do) and on those that would impede or question the “War on Terror” (that would be the Dems).

And, with the help of corporate media, IGNORANCE will be assured to the masses who do not or cannot (like working three jobs to survive) seek the Truth.

I hope I’m wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wait......you forgot the fourth (most dominant?) horseman........
GREED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. i never forget about GREED

but, GREED is not being used to manipulate the working class.

it is being celebrated by the monied elite.

it is not part of the TRIFECTA being used against us in marketing acceptance for their GREED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'd like to see a graph plot the changes in the Terra Alert*
with the Bush political "events" and overall popularity.










* A registered trademark of the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. The boy who cried wolf
These alerts are starting to have the opposite affect, and as we all know from childhood fables, that can be quite dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. ORANGE ALERT!
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 12:26 AM by thebigidea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. huh?
Do you have a link?

The DHS website shows a yellow alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. Locking
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. If you start a thread in the General Discussion forum, you must present your opinion in a manner that is not inflammatory, which respects differences in opinion, and which is likely to lead to respectful discussion rather than flaming. Some examples of things which should generally be avoided are: unnecessarily hot rhetoric, nicknames for prominent Democrats or their supporters, broad-brush statements about groups of people, single-sentence "drive-by" thread topics, etc.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

3. The subject line of a discussion thread may not include profanity or swear words, even if words or letters are replaced by asterisks, dashes, or abbreviations.

4. The subject line and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation.

5. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

6. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC