Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is the one that should pass (mass amendment)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Options Remain Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:08 PM
Original message
This is the one that should pass (mass amendment)
Cambridge Sen. Jarrett T. Barrios proposed amendment

It is the public policy of this commonwealth to protect the unique relationship of marriage in order to promote, among other goals, the stability and welfare of society. All marriages between two people shall be eligible for all the rights and benefits of marriage.


Two failed this is the one we want. Debate is now. Anyone watching?

TearForger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why Are They Bothering?
The law is clear and concise. Keep it simple, it's equal rights.

U.S. Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. At work ...
please keep us informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
that amendment discriminates against (some) Mormons. No constitutional amendments whatsoever are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC