Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CSPAN Thursday AM — Gay Marriage Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:57 AM
Original message
CSPAN Thursday AM — Gay Marriage Amendment
Should be interesting. Anybody listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for the heads up
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. If homosexuality was a choice
a straight person could become a homosexual?

LOL.

The caller from Texas was awesome. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I liked the last caller
If two gays get married, how does that affect me? I also liked the other point that we don't have any other constitutional amendments that actually take away civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wish I was. It sounds like an intelligent debate. You should have seen..
Joe Scarborough's show last night. There was a debate about gay marriage. He had someone on from the Family Research Council (homophobes), a gay legislator from California and PAT BOONE (certified old religious nutcase). 2 against one. Boone was spouting the same tired old relgious gibberish..."marriage is for procreation only", blah blah blah blah. Incredibly stupid nonsense.

The C-Span debate hopefully should be more enlightening.

Terry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's wrong
the federal marriage amendment would get rid of all civil unions in any state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm watchng now and it's really good stuff
The woman from HRC is very clear and factual. The guy has already been offensive and keeps trying to say that someone from the Martin Luther King camp is leading the charge with him. I love the caller too who is a man with grown kids and grandkids and he asked the guy how this would effect him, he said it wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Now he's spouting "kids are better off with 1 man & 1 woman"
but nobody ever, ever suggests that any of the constitutional amendments include provisions outlawing divorce. Seems that it would do so much to help those kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah well I got news for that weasle.
I was raised by a single parent. My upbringing wasn't the best, but I knew there were kids who had it a lot worse than I did.

Now I am in a loving and very committed relationship with a woman. Since meeting this woman, I have picked up my whole knowledge base. I mean, I have gone out and learned how to code web pages, all because this woman gave me the inspiration to do it. And I know a damn site more about a lot of things now, because I want to sit and have intelligent well meaning conversations with her.

It isn't about raising a kid with a mum and dad, it is about showing that kid they are loved by the parents in that house, so they too will aspire to great things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Exactly!
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 08:45 AM by prolesunited
I think that's a great response when people raise that argument.

We can just reply, "So, perhaps we should outlaw divorce? Maybe we need a constitutional amendment. If you have children, you lose your right to divorce."

On edit: Almost forgot my manners. Welcome to DU, BR_Parkway! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. This is the line the phobes are now pushing.
I heard that lie on Scarborough last night. The Family Research Council rep peddled that. The notion that civil unions won't be affected is a lie. Gay marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships all will be voided if FMA is passed. FMA was specifically written to do that.

Terry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Thank you Terry
You ought to start a thread about this fact it isn't just about homosexuals it's about man woman domestic partners also they too will lose things such as insurance coverage rights through employers. If anyone thinks that the corportistas are going to continue to keep coverage and benefits for domestic partners if this passes is sadly mistaken! Capitalism is all about the bottom line and this will save them money and they will end domestic partner benefits.

Regardless of that FMA is mean-spirited and Un-American since when did it become acceptable to amend the constitution to take away rights of certain groups?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for the heads up...
...proles. I am listening to it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. I heard a lot on the radio and did think about it and.....
I came up with the same old thing. I am a libertarian on these things.Do as you see fit. Hell in high school we laughed because two men got married in our town and a local man performed the legal part of it.I lived in a Summer resort and between Kennbunkport and where I live was a big gay/artist/actor community . I am sure even George Bush visited this place as every one went there to feed on some great sea food and party. it is about 5/10 miles from where he spent some part of his Summers. I am willing to bet people knew things he was up to there. I lived about 5/10 miles south and we all partied in that town.I got out of high school in the 50's by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Is anybody from DU...
...trying to call in? I would, but it would cost me a bucket load of bucks to do it, because I don't have a phone card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. no but this guy from texas called and told...
the HRC gal that she had every right to call the FAM dude a bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh I didn't hear that...
...I tuned in towards the end.

I think I woke the neighbours up a few times (it is wee hours of the morning here in Melbourne), when I was screaming nasty words at the computer. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. If it's a social norm
and an aspirational norm, why do we need a law? What happened to conservatives stance about personal responsibility and choice and their revulsion of the nanny state attempts at social engineering.

It's now all about the children. :eyes:

They need a mother and father. Are we going to start banning divorce if a couple has kids as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AG78 Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's just amazing
What passes for divisive issues these days. But then again, it took 190 years from the official founding of the country until black people were either no longer slaves, or thought of as actual human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. There were lots of pro-FMA people on Washington Journal this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. the FMA dude playing the race card
i love how he kept saying, essentially, we arent bigots, weve got blacks supporting us.

apparently he forgot that the 2003 anniversary of the march on washington was a shared event with civil rights and gay rights.

(an article where corretta scott king links gay rights with the civil rights movement.) http://www.hatecrime.org/subpages/coretta.html

(the gay and lesbian task force's "we walk with you march")http://www.ngltf.org/statelocal/mowmedia.htm

Bayard Rustin - organiser of the first march on washington. gay man.
http://www.rustin.org/about.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC