Freeper pearls of wisdom:

[Mobius]

I went to look, I admit it. I thought it might be good fodder for entertainment. I had to stop after the last one:
Bush met military obligation <posts>

To: Hon
Maybe the reason more folks don't remember Bush in the Guard is that they are afraid the Dem's will send hit men to mess their heads up so bad, they'll end up vegetables in a nursing home, wearing diapers.

To: Ronin
These treasonous scumbag Democrats have probably done more to unite the wavering Republicans annoyed by amnesty and medicare than Bush/Rove ever could have on their own.
Kerry photo a 'big lie,' Fonda says <posts>
To: kattracks
The traitor beyatch Fonda is playing right into it. Stepping out to defend Kerry - perfect!

This is just the beginning. Kerry is going to have hell unleashed on him. He said bring it on, well John, it's on! You wanted to pick a fight, smear the Prez, and dis the Guard? You want to puff out your chest and play the man? Well, get ready to get your ass kicked by a real man.

A couple weeks ago I admit I was nervous. Then I got pissed. Now I'm ready to do whatever it takes to keep this ahole away from the White House. And I'm starting to see the strategery here. Kerry may not be Dukakis, but neither is Bush 2 Bush 1. W knows how to play this guy.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I wonder who asked Jane Fonda to appear on CNN tonight?
My guess is that old dope addict cant remember anything beyond her last alimony check from her ex U.N. worshiping Hubby Ted Turner, and that's why she said she didn't know who Kerry was until after he became a Senator
To: MJY1288
John F'ing Fonda Kerry........
This is going to get interesting...

The devious, corrupt, power crazy democrats are going to have their a$$es handed to them this November....

Praise the Lord - and speak up Fonda dear....

To: Sloth; Austin Willard Wright; Grut; Henrietta
Wrote this on another thread last night. Worth repeating to you, although your minds are as closed as a coffin:
Choose, people!
Do we want to be forever subservient to the UN?
Or do we want to continue our sovereign right to self-determination and self-protection?
Are we ashamed of America such that we need a president to apologize for us at every turn?
Or was that spontaneous bout of flag-waving and American pride after 9/11 real?
Do we want a leftist (i.e., Marxist) president who will make us subservient to the International Criminal Court, the Kyoto treaty, and every other pseudo-world government body?
Or do we want to maintain GWB's reversal of those Clinton policies?
Do we still cherish our unique Constitutional system and American heritage?
Or are we ready to toss it overboard?
Do we want to abandon the War on Terrorism, military tribunals for America's enemies, and taking the fight to the enemy?
Or do we want to continue the course set by President George W. Bush?
There is NO MIDDLE GROUND in this election. The choice is stark and the decision very grave, indeed. This November, we shall finally see what kind of country the United States is in this Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Four (to use the ancient formulation).
posted on 02/11/2004 12:01:18 PM PST by (A self-confident cowboy nation, or a Kerrified nation. Your choice.)

[theorist]

1. Y'know? I thought that Fonda/Kerry picture looked fake.

Kerry looks too pixalated for it to be real film. Maybe someone can dig up the picture that Kerry's mug was cut from. That would make Shamity and Limbstone look really good!

[Gingersnap]

3. Even if it is real--we have photos of Rummy shaking Saddam's hand

And Bush and "Kenny boy" were great friends.
Not to mention the close ties between the Bush clan and the bin Ladens. I think Kerry keeps much less questionable company.

[ComerPerro]

5. Yeah no shit

If they want to talk about connections, lets introduce the public to Bush's close connections. The bin Ladens, the Saudis, Saddam......

[Gingersnap]

2. OMG

That last post is the scariest. I cannot even fathom thinking that way---I guess the guy is right, there is no middle ground in this election. You're either sane or not.

[Mobius]

4. That was only after 5 minutes

Imagine how much scarier it gets?

[punpirate]

6. Bush is...

... "a real man." ????

Boy, are these assholes off on a tangent....

[monobrau]

7. PURITY OF ESSENCE

Must..protect...our precious...fluids...

[booley]

8. Ok, LOOK!

Can't we just admit that freepers as a group are evil, callouse living rationales for birth control and MOVE ON!

While it's fun wading in the shallow end of the gene pool for a little while, eventually one begins to feel...dirty. and not in the good way.

[Gemini Cat]

9. Scary people, indeed.

~And just as soon as they finish that sandwich and wipe the drool off their chins, they'll take a nervous peek out their windows and go hide the loo for a couple of hours. (They're scared of liberals. They really don't want to confront one face to face and one might be outside their house!!) Later on they'll emerge ready for yet another round of high flying action that consists of nothing but pounding their collective brain on the 'net about liberals, Clinton's weenus, gays, feminists and everything else their shared brain can't handle. I said brain, not brains and that one brain doesn't function well.
Yep. That's a moran freeper in his/her natural habitat.


:dem:

[Mobius]

10. A really stupid Borg Collective

With Ann Coulter as Borg Queen.

[Loonman]

11. Freepers are so damn stupid, they're still on that Jane Fonda thing

Total chowderheads.

[Katarina]

12. strategery...

I cannot believe someone actually said strategery! These people are nuts...bushbots one and all.

[snippy]

13. Always remember that John Wilkes Booth was the original freeper.

[Moderator]

14. Locking

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator