But, Bush has had such success in dismantling Social Programs/What DEM

[KoKo]

Could Win?

Wouldn't it be better to re-elect Bush...let him implode..take PNAC and Supply Side Economics Down...and we would be rid of the infection we've had since Nixon?

Wouldn't letting them implode: Gingrich/Reagan/PNAC/WHATEVER side of the party go down and serve jail times be better than just having an "Interim?" I'm not down on having the "Interim/Kerry" but, I wonder if this is the best thing "LONG TERM" for our Party.

:shrug: I honestly am in a quandry about this......and that holds me back from Kerry.

[lastknowngood]

1. The reality is a bitch that America may well not survive much

beyond the selection in November.

[KoKo]

2. If someone could convince me that John Kerry would "roll back" Bush, I'd

be a huge supporter of his campaign. But, as it stands, it seems Howard Dean with much of Kucinich had the best view of the "RoadPlan" for America after Bush.

I see Kerry as "more of the same." How much can he "roll back?" And, does he really have the DEDICATION TO ROLL BACK that I've seen from Dean/Kucinich?

Theresa was a Repug...she's probably great on our "Environment." And Kerry, himself.

BUT! There's more going on with "Fundamentals" in America than our terrible Environment....it's the DEBT, JOBS, CORPORATE CORRUPTION (CEO's MAKING BILLIONS) and HOW do we get AMERICA BACK ON TRACK?

Don't get me started on "Pre-Emptive Strikes," but I covered that with PNAC.

[Moderator]

3. Locking

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator