Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did this not make Top 10 Conservative idiots?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:38 PM
Original message
How did this not make Top 10 Conservative idiots?
http://www.aclu.org/LesbianGayRights/LesbianGayRights.cfm?ID=14838&c=41

Look at the excerpts from the majority decision...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excerpts from both decisions:
Selected Quotes from Justice Henry W. Green, Jr.’s Majority Opinion:

Heterosexual men who have sex with 14- and 15-year-old girls deserve a lighter sentence to encourage procreation:

"Throughout history, governments have extolled the virtues of procreation as a way to furnish new workers, soldiers, and other useful members of society. The survival of society requires a continuous replenishment of its members."

Heterosexual men who have sex with 14- and 15- year-old girls deserve a lighter sentence to encourage the young men to marry the girls they have slept with and provide for their potential offspring:

"When a child is born from a relationship between a minor and a young adult, the minor is often unable to financially support the newborn child. In many cases, the minor is still a dependent. As a result, the financial burden to support the newborn child properly falls to the young adult. Obviously, the young adult cannot furnish adequate financial support for the newborn child while he or she is incarcerated. The legislature could well have concluded that incarcerating the young adult parent for a long period would be counterproductive to the requirement that a parent has a duty to provide support to his or her minor child… On the other hand, same-sex relationships do not generally lead to unwanted pregnancies. As a result, the need to release the same-sex offender from incarceration is absent."

From Justice Joseph Pierron, Jr.’s Dissent: (Positive)

"Carved in stone above the pillars in front of the United States Supreme Court building are the words ‘Equal Justice Under Law.’ In bronze letters on the north interior wall of the Kansas Judicial Center we read ‘Within These Walls The Balance Of Justice Weighs Equal.’ There are reasons why we remind ourselves so graphically of the importance of equal justice. Persons in power and authority have historically been tempted to discriminate against people they do not like or understand. If these personal and political dislikes become law and exceed the bounds of constitutionality, the courts have been given the duty to be the final protectors of our ideal of equality under the law. This blatantly discriminatory sentencing provision does not live up to American standards of equal justice."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtseiler Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's about time
that we seriously started thinking about kicking some states out of the union, or just turning them into a national landfill or something.

I can't think of anything of value that Kansas does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kansas is the world's biggest shit hole when it comes to education...
Teachers losing jobs for not giving students a free pass when the majority of a class refuses to do a major project.

Science class not allowed to teach evolution or light refraction to appease a few fascist posters.

Only one reason to save Kansas:

Topeka's council has condemned Fred Phelps' actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They can't teach about light refraction?
What's that about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. (Not joking)
It supposedly contradicts the way in which God created the rainbow in the Book of Fenesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're kidding!
I know you said you weren't, and I believe you, but that's basic physics. You can do it with a light source and a prism! I've got to remember to never raise children in Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. and the lord said...
"let there be light, and there was light, and it was not bent nor distorted, nor was its wavelength insomuchas altered" ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Not true,it was overturned in 2001
Even Newsmax had to post the sad news....

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/2/14/193914.shtml

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sorry...
I should have checked again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I can think of another: I live here :)
BTW, every KS farmer feeds 101 people. You like to eat, right? Plus we have the largest ball of twine in the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is an absolute outrage!
What kind of fucked up logic is that? Those bastards ought to be impeached IMMEDIATELY! Heres hoping that the ACLU is successful in defending this young man. I've said this before and I'll say it again, who do these people think they are, injecting themselves into a persons sex life? Damn that angers me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Product of Evolution Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Interesting facts the ACLU didn't mention...
1. In Canada, he would not even be a criminal.

2. (Implied) Had he done that a week earlier, he would also not be a criminal, as the incident occurred 1 week after his 18th birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC