Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Quaeda has a nuke bought in '98! Guess who the right will blame.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:54 AM
Original message
Al Quaeda has a nuke bought in '98! Guess who the right will blame.
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 01:54 AM by Merlin
(I originally thought the report indicated a recent purchase, in which case the onus would be on Bush. But the Arabic source of this report says they bought it in 1998.)

So the Clinton program of buying down the nuclear stockpile of the old Soviet Union didn't work?

Link (courtesy LBN):
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/392006.html

On further edit:

The Al-Hayat site is in Arabic only and seems not to have an English language version, so the subtleties of this story can't really be checked unless one can read Arabic.

I don't know much about the cred of Haaretz. Anybody else?

(Note: there IS a Dar al Hayat in English, but that is published out of Lebanon and is probably an entirely different news source, since it has no reference in today's edition to this story.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you really believe Al Qaeda has nukes? Not sure that I do at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. To the right wing, truth is incidental.
What counts is propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isreal's been feeding information for a long time
and I suspect that's where alot of the 'intel' came from for Iraq. There's a book written by a former Isreali intelligence official (I'll have to check on the name of it, sorry) that talks about starting a rumor with enriched uranium from Africa. Sound familiar? It was written in the mid to late 1990's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Possible entry points?
They'd be lucky to get it into the US. They'd need several suit case size nukes and ship them in on containers hoping a cell could intercept it without getting caught. Then they'd be lucky to get it out of said port city. (I'm thinking somewhere in the South, i.e. Florida, Georgia, or South Carolina.) :nuke:

Note to Ashcroft: I am a graduate student in Bloomington, IN and am not a terrorist. If you would like me to apply for a postition as an analyst in your office (and I know your people could find me), give me a call, I'd be happy to have a little chat. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'll be looking out for your posts, Theo.
Note to Ashcroft: This is my first contact with him. I am just expressing my concern for his free speech, right to an attorny and his care when you take him away.

Please, do the same for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. What makes you think that ports in

the South are less closely watched than ones in the North, or on the Pacific coast?

I agree that port security is a major problem and is not getting enough attention, but I'd never heard it was worse in Savannah or Mobile than in San Francisco or Boston.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. They wouldn't have to get it any closer than the anchorage/dock...
...of a major port city in the U. S. Why carry it inland when so many major targets are along the coast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Granite Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Go IU!
Another IU alum here (2 degrees).

I, too, doubt that AQ has a Nuke - plus, as you said, the mechanics of delivering/detonating such a device doesn't cause me to lose sleep at night.

Asymetrical attacks, unforseen possibilities, and irrationality (i.e. suicide bombers) are what tend to make me nervous.

Good to see a fellow Hoosier poster - do you follow IU basketball?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who is making this claim?
Sounds like just the sort of election year fearmongering bullshit we've all been expecting from Bush's crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Have a link?
Let's not pay any attention to Bush's reaction to the Pakistani nuclear scientist selling information to NKorea & Iran. He just got a tongue lashing, was forgiven and sent on his merry way with his fortune in tact. Where's this administration's outrage over this fact?

Let's also not forget the tremendous damage this administration did by outing Valerie Plame and her entire operation that monitored wmds. Imagine how many are now on the black market, and without her vital efforts, we haven't a clue where they are and who has them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's Al-Hayat (London) via Haaretz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. They've held on to this for SIX YEARS?
Not likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, and Osama didn't use it when he was being obliterated in Afghan.
Remember when he was holed up in the Tora Bora mountains. We rained an unbelievable tonnage of explosives on that range for about 3 weeks. He was probably wounded during the barrage, but still escaped because Tommy Franks was too gutless to cover the eastern escape routes near the Paki border.

This story sounds more and more like a new product of Rove's right wing fear machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. they have an English version
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 02:06 AM by La_Serpiente
However, I do not think the story has been translated yet.

Juan Cole hasn't touched on it.

here is his webblog

http://www.juancole.com/

Here is Al-Hayat

http://english.daralhayat.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks for the link, snake.
By the way, is that incredible picture real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 02:38 AM by La_Serpiente
it is from the Hubble Telescope

great yeah?

I got it here

http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pictures.html

By the way, it takes awhile for them to translate stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. Now suppose we get nuked just in time to save Bush's ass
This way, they get to blame Clinton AND instill martial law!

Hoo Boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Anyone heard more about this story? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Al Hayat still has no English version of this story. I'd say it's bogus.
If there were anything at all to this, it would be world news by now, and they would surely have put up a translation.

Sorry for sounding the alarm. Sounded plausible at first. Glad it's not true.

One thing it points out is how right Howard Dean is when he lambasts Bush for shutting down the buy-down program Clinton had implemented to acquire the remaining nuke arsenal of the Soviet Union. We are nuts if we don't follow thru on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. this is about as unbelievable
as the "memo" they found in a Baghdad al-Qaeda safe house. You know the one that links Iraq and al-Qaeda?

I don't trust anything anyone tells me about this situation anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC