Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a real fear after the MTP debacle:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:07 PM
Original message
a real fear after the MTP debacle:
rove may be evil and demented, but he is not stupid. he knows * struck out today. i smell a major "diversion" coming up in the next few days. an attack? what do you guys think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal_Andy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. smells lika code orange to me
Al Kita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. not just yet,
damage control is probably ongoing, but you can expect something mid summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was It Really That Bad?
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 05:10 PM by Beetwasher
I didn't/Can't/won't watch him. It's really a matter of my health as I'm sure I'd try to punch my fist through the wall and hurt myself.

I predicted it would be an abomination, but I haven't seen much in the way of real good objective analysis yet in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Impressions of the interview


# of times he used key phrases in the first half of the show (may have missed one or two)
terrorist/war against/on terror - 11111111111
danger to america/dangerous/dangerous man/madman - 1111111111111111
deadly/weapon/wmd - 111111111

I think many were worried this would be a 'softball' interview and I think Tim asked the questions that were on everyones mind. He did a good job. I think he pushed the envelope as far as he could --- after all, this is the prez and his show depends on being able to book people from the administration on his show. I'd give Tim **** out of ***** I don't think the answers would have been any different had he been tougher.

Bush didn't make any major mistakes.
He looked ill at ease at times and his answers were rambling at times and he stammered a lot. Seemed not to have much conviction or confidence in his answers - as though he was reciting the mantra.

Think his answers on the decisons to go to war will not sit well with people --- they were 'non' answers. I was struck most by the last two questions at the end of the first half. When asked about the loss of american lives - was the war worth it just because he was a bad man -- there was no real passion in the presidents answer. He acted as though he'd never given it much though - he stumbled over the answer - rambled - talked about himself and his responsibility more than about the sacrifice of the men and women he sent in harms way or their families. He didn't even say they died for a noble cause.
When asked if this was a war of choice or necessity - he was grinning - that wasn't very appropriate.
He is not only incapable of pronouncing NUKE-U-LAR but he is incapable of pronouncing PEN-IN-SHOE-LA as well.

I think 'thinking' American's who tended to support the prez - will walk away from that interview questioning their support of this man.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thanks!
That was a terrific analysis!

Welcom to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Only time he didn't seem ill at ease was when he said
he was going to win the next election. Said it with serious conviction. The only time he sounded confident. Scurred me....

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:59 PM
Original message
Said it with serious conviction
You betcha! Let's hope it won't be close enough for Smirk Boy and Team Smirk to steal it again! They will sure try!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpibel Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. Wait a second here
Isn't "thinking person who supports the *resident" an oxymoron?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. It was a terrible interview for Bush
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 09:59 PM by jumptheshadow
The guy came off as shallow, shifty, defensive, dishonest and inept. He clearly was nervous while being questioned about his National Guard record -- and he kept on equating the questions about his individual record with criticism of the Guard itself. He must have said "I was honorably discharged" four or five times. Perhaps he doesn't realize that many Americans will say to themselves, "Yeah, because your Daddy bailed you out." He seemed to get a gleam in his eye when, after saying he would open his papers up for inspection, he added, "If you can find anything in those records." (That wasn't a verbatim quote, but he said something like that.)

Russert questioned him about the aggressively partisan nature of his administration and he talked about his record as governor in Texas. Pathetic.

Russert introduced the topic of the economy, and Bush, relieved because the subject was being changed off of his military record, quickly got flattened when Russert read off the statistics on joblessness. Bush acted clueless, and basically pawned everything off on 9/11.

There were so many times when Bush stumbled or drifted off or just sounded dumb and arrogant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "I haven't seen much in the way of real good objective analysis yet in the
press"

Ummmm, while you might see some objective analysis in the foreign press, you're likely to see "real good objective analysis" in the US press around the time that hell freezes over, pigs fly, etc.

US press is like the old Pravda at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. There're Some Columnists Whose Analysis I'm Looking Forward Too
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 05:23 PM by Beetwasher
Krugman for example...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. my take: stump speech, used key phrases repeatedly (especially madman
in reference to Saddam Hussein), stumbled about average for GWB*, rambled some, if stuck went back to key phrases, bait and switch on war questions, had some trouble answering the "was it worth it" question on Iraq in light of the loss of life, was stuck badly on economy (Russert had charts), whole thing pretty much ego-centric (no mention of team, or administration, all answers were in I terms), ended with claim of vision to change the world. Overall, fairly boring. The last bit bothered me, though.

This is obviously not an objective take, I don't trust the man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. pretty good analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. the word "war" used 33 times n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Typical *
Incoherent, inconsistent, and semi-conscious of what he was saying.I was not in the least bit surprised..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will do it another way
The smears are already coming about the "liberal" record of Kerry, and how he is weak on defense, etc, etc, etc.

They are pushing the fear factor and hope that will work.

I am afraid it just might...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. how can AWOL with a couple of
failed / failing wars under his belt be considered strong on defense against someone who actually served in Vietnam? i'm not a kerry supporter but against * it's a no-brainer. he's been an idiot from day 1 but holy moly he broke his own record today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'd love to see the blooper reel
given that this was recorded, and that there must have been many halts and cuts, from what I've read of the debacle the outakes must be hillarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12.  Can't wait to see the Letterman show monday
and see if he has the "unfair editing" segment on this..

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nwstrn Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. MSNBC edited bush* stuttering episode
MSNBC's "highlights" included a clip of bush*'s answer concerning the Iraq casualties, and I was surprised--his answer has a lengthy pause and a stuttering episode that was one of the most embarrassing parts of the interview. Here it comes, I thought! But, no worry, that part was edited out, making bushie sound (slightly) more coherent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. unfortunately, with the diminished expectations going in...
Bush, as usual, managed not to make a major mistake...in those terms, it was a success...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nwstrn Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Can you play the low expectations game when you're President?
That trick may have worked in 2000, but should it now? He's the President, for goodness sake, and he sounded like a complete imbecile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. No major mistakes but Turd Blossom Rove is going to be disappointed.
The purpose of this interview was to stop Bush's declining numbers in the polls. I do not think it will be successful.

Bush's performance was neither extremely strong nor extremely weak. Consequently, it will have no impact on committed Bush supporters or committed Bush opponents. However, since it was not particularly impressive, it probably will not alter the current trends in the minds of the rest of the public either.

An hour long interview in the Oval Office with any president of the United States should be impressive. This interview was not. Bush smiled, smirked or chuckled during every answer to every question on every topic. He was hesitant and spoke haltigly. He did not seem to be particularly well informed or well prepared. He had few facts to support any of his assertions. He seemed somewhat detached and bemused. He was almost overwhelmingly unimpressive. The failure to be impressive was a failure to persuade or convince doubting voters.

If any other politician had given this performance it would universally be labeled a disaster. However, because of the low expectations everyone has of Bush and because he did speak in complete phrases of rudimentary English, few will call this a disaster. But, since the purpose of the interview was to bolster Bush's falling numbers I think it will be seen as a disappointment in the White House. Just like the Steroids of the Union speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yep. Bush saying "I flew a jet plane and enjoyed it" must have been less
than his handlers had hoped for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. It was bad
He looks terrible. He stuttered, spun and dodged all over the place. Nothing he says makes any sense. He speaks with no conviction whatsoever. It's as though he's reading it off of a prompter. At one point he used the phrase "arm up" in regards to countries that stockpile weapons. He smirked when answering the questions about his military records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleBob Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The Most Horrifying Statement That Bush Has Made
I couldn't believe how bad he looked on MTP today. Well, actually, it wasn't really a surprise that he looked bad. He always looks bad...smirking, stumbling over words, etc...but one phrase stuck in my mind after watchin him. It was something that he actually said without stumbling over words...

"I'm a war president. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind."

That is a pretty horrifying statement for any leader to make, but especially in the context of discussing whether or not war was justified and also in a world in which other countries respect and trust in the United States is waning quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. and how about that "use of American power" in the world thingie.....
coupled with the "war president" "war on my mind" shit really caught my ear. This is not my vision for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleBob Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Not Very Many People Have That Vision Of The USA
Within the United States, not many people have that vision. They don't "want to go to war." Soldiers losing lives to fight in a war that wasn't really necessary doesn't usually sit well with the American public. The scary thing, however, is that many countries outside of the US now see us as a country that is willing to go to war BEFORE we are actually provoked into war. The Bush administration's message to the rest of the world was basically "do what you're told or we might blow you up." And he strengthened that message in his answers to Russert's questions today.

There's a major difference between being stern enough for other countries to respect the US and issuing vague threats about war. War should be the last resort for any leader, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhino47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I agree Seattle
scared the shit outta me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. "I'm a war president"
freaked me out. Something about the way he said "the homeland" did too. He's got this look on his face like he didn't expect being president would be this hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. That's the statement that most horrifies me
I keep replaying that in my head. He really thinks this way and will run on this. :scared:

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. That, and "this economy is coming along just right."
Sell THAT one to the unemployed and laid off, george. See how they like it, and if they'll agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Yes and I agree
if I were talented I would make a video of that statement
"I am a war president"

and show the terrible photos of Iraqi children who were murdered by this arrogant, stupid AWOL prick of a man who did not even win the election in the first place and who will forever have the asterisk after his name in any history book worth it's salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. he should have said "I chose to be a war pResident"
That was my take on it. He sickens me. Maybe we could all email pics of Iraqi children minus limbs to him, along with pictures of the food packets/cluster bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleBob Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. That seems like a possibility
With Bush's sagging ratings, there's going to have to be some kind of diversion to take the American public's focus away from GWB's ineptitude...but what will it be? I think that it might very well be a possibility that they will suddenly "find" Osama Bin Laden and parade him around as a "symbol that the war on terror is working." If that happens, the public will eat it up. And that's scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleBob Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Little Plastic Army Men In A Sandbox
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 07:08 PM by SeattleBob
It's weird to listen to Bush talk about war. It's almost like he can't fathom that "war is bad." He talks about people dying like it is just a necessary outcome of "the good fight." He acts like he honestly enjoys going to war. It's like he's sitting in a sandbox playing with those little plastic army men. SCARY.

Sometimes war is necessary, unfortunately, but usually not. But when a leader announces to the world that he makes foreign policy decisions with "war on his mind" that is flat out terrifying. Especially when the people in his administration are just as hungry for war as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Good analogy. Reminds me of this.
Bush works out war strategy in backyard sandbox

Crawford, Texas -- Making good on his promise to use August's untimely 25-day retreat as a "working vacation," President Bush began masterminding tactical maneuvers for offensive strikes on Iraq in the backyard sandbox of his Texas ranch Sunday afternoon.

. . .

During Bush's intensely focused six-hour strategy session - which involved the fabrication of forts, foxholes, bunkers, roads and tunnels; the dressing and arming of several 12-inch G. I. Joe action figures; the positioning of artillery, vehicles, tents and munitions depots and detailed run-throughs of actual combat situations levied against an imaginary resistance - the President simulated defenses for a variety of possible engagements: from protecting against very likely threats such as suicide bombing attacks to the highly unlikely event of U.S. soldiers being stomped on by giant feet.

. . .

http://www.recoilmag.com/news/bush_works_out_war_strategy_0902.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mykpart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Maye he'll have to pull Osama bin Laden
out of his ass now instead of waiting for October!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. welcome seattle bob!
great points, and i totally agree.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. i've seen "fat burner" infomercials that looked better than bush did
the dems have to repeat what bush said and refute it all along the campaign trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC