|
are sick people and will try and spin the truth. Unfortunately, i'm not alway articulate in my defense of liberals, but i do know right from wrong! I posted some the points on this thread to a group of conservatives that hangout in another message board and this is what they wrote back:
"In short, cutting the taxes across the board is a bad idea, huh? Cutting taxes to those "rich" people possessing the cash the stimulates the economy was a bad idea? Last time I checked, you can't borrow money from a poor man, can you? And you can't borrow money from a rich man when the tax environment isn't conducive for him to free up his money and invest, can you?
About the same number of military families are on welfare today as existed in the "Good Old Days" of Clintoon-Gwhore. And the U.S. Armed Forces were present in over 140 nations when Bush took office from Clinton, right?
Yeah... Bush decided to "JUST ALLOW" the 9-11 Islamic nutcases to topple the World Trade Center buildings that morning of Sept 11th. It was a slow day and he was just talking to some kids, so this was a good time. Post a link to ANY site with a SCINTILLA of CREDIBILITY that "Bush Knew", ok?
Dean, in some small part, is shuffling off into political oblivion because he said, repeatedly, that America is no more safe today with Saddam Hussein in captivity than when Hussein was free. But I don't seek to muzzle How-Weird Dean. He's much more useful running his undisciplined, intolerant, paranoid mouth.
So getting rid of Saddam Hussein has left us just as unsafe?
This is fundmentmentally absurd.
Hussein tried to murder the former president of the United States. If this doesn't bespeak a certain type of hatred to you, nothing will.
Use your imagination for something aside from Bush bashing for just a moment.
The Clinton administration was CERTAIN Hussein still possessed WMD. Bush was too. IF Hussein had these weapons, and in the number he was reputed to have by Clinton's estimation as recently as 1998, he could easily have given a small quantity of VX, for example, to bin Laden or any number of OTHER ISLAMIC NUTCASE FANATICS. The southern U.S. border is about as secure as a vase teetering on a pedestal in a 9.5 Richter scale earthquake (THIS is Bush's true weakness.. he's trying to OUT-DEM the Dems on refusing to asert the right of a sovereign nation to control immigration). It would have "cost" Hussein virtually nothing to equip one of many Islamic nutcase groups with a few pounds of nerve agent.
Deficit spending DOES MATTER... but to a point. Rich men, and rich nations have, in many decades past, run up large, even alarming deficits... and rebounded quite nicely from these deficits. As large as the deficits Ronald Reagan ran up, despite the Dem cries that these deficits would "destroy the world", in Reagan's final defeat of communism, it didn't take long to erase these deficits under Bush 41 and Clinton, now did it? The "bottom line" is the the DEBTOR is the one that is closely critiqued. the USA possess incredible wealth in so many facets.... and the former USSR possessed only WMD and a broken down, hackneyed fiscal policy doomed to self-defeat under the application of pressure by a fiscal giant.
If/when Bush, or his follow on President(s), finally breaks the back of worldwide "MY God is Better than Your God" terrorism, the deficits might just fall away in a decade(s) long paroxysm of capitalistic, beneficial, international trading.
It took only one decade to clean up the fiscal "mess" that Democrats were grousing about while Reagan was busy driving the final nail into the coffin of Soviet communism.
It may take a bit more, or a bit less, time to drive the final nail into the mindset of a religion hijacked by a relative few nutcases that somehow feel it is "religious" to blow up airlines and knock down buildings populated by innocents of all religions.
I'd suggest you tilt at whatever windmills you like, but history and politics is obviously not your "strong suit".
|