Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do Republicans not believe in employment discrimination against gays?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:01 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do Republicans not believe in employment discrimination against gays?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 08:22 PM by dsc
On tonight's Capital Gang the topic of gay marriage came up and Carlson made this rather astonishing assertion. I live in a rural area but not a particularly bad one towards gays. But I frankly think it is ridiculous to state that no Republicans wish to discriminate against gays amymore.

Incidently, we still have only 10 states which ban such discrimination. CA, NY, NH, VT, CT, MA, WI, MD, RI, and HI. edit forget MN so it is 11 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. i have PERSONALLY BEEN ORDERED
to not hire gays. the ceo said he wanted his to be a "family" company.

i was chief technology officer of a small software company and the ceo was basically saying i should prefer less qualified people, so long as they were straight.

i'm very proud to say that i promptly quit. i should point out that this was in austin, texas, where there is a city ordinance against this sort of thing.

i am even more proud to say that the company went out of business less than a year after i left. the cto of a software company quitting is a BIG DEAL, so i can only hope that i was the nail in the coffin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. great story
thank you very much. I hope you landed on your feet and prospered. You certainly deserve to have done so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. i did ... eventually
i was unemployed a few months, then landed at another dot-bomb.... then i joined a consulting company starting up a branch in austin .... they were a disaster, too ... it's amazing how BADLY people can run companies and remain convinced that they're right....

so 3 separate bouts of unemployment, all in all a horrible year economically. but then i ended up where i am now. nearly 3 years at this job, it's not only the best job ever, but also the company was the best prospects of all the startups i've worked for....

so, yes, it took a while, but it all ends up for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I am so glad of that
If there is a heaven I am sure you will be welcome right in. It is great that you did the next right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. this is close to the reason that conservatives don't practice this
The costs of accusations of this kind are too great a risk to tolerate. However they feel personally, they will not worry about it unless it comes to interfere with that person's job performance.

Now you will always be able to fish up exceptions but in policy and in fact, its better than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. you forgot Minnesota
we do have such a law. some idiots tried to repeal it last year but they failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. editted sorry about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the fact that anyone tried to repeal it though...
proves Carlson wrong.

(btw, the main sponsor of the bill was the same guy who said gays were not persecuted in the Holocaust)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. They believe that it happens.
But, they agree with it. Encourge it. For them, it's the RIGHT thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gay rights are just another wedge issue
to divide people and keep them from acting on their own economic self interest.

If people that had the same problems would look around and see how all these 'issues' are designed to keep people in separate 'interest' groups from forming a massive group that demanded social justice, then the ultra wealthy and powerful would lose control.

'We' is more powerful than 'me'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. They will discriminate against anyone who doesn't look like them,
think like them, dress like them, believe like them, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pretty Boy Tucker, Like Pretty Boy Reed Fear Being Considered Gay.
Hence, they continually go out of their way to tell everyone that they are not gay.

Sissy Gary Bauer, a wimpy heterosexual, also reveals his internal fears of being labeled "queer" by also bashing gays every chance he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think they meant Margaret Carlson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Wrong Carlson it is Margaret not Tucker
which makes this all the more bizarre. I am really beginning to wonder just what planet I live on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rich gay people or the other 90%? That's the key
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC