Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq is safer now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ACPS65 Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:19 PM
Original message
Iraq is safer now.
Apparently the new Repug talking point is, despite 500+ troops dead Iraq is a safer place and made Lybia give up their WMD program, etc. ,etc.

What do you say to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Libya was backing off their WMD programs well before Iraq...
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 02:25 PM by Richardo
...even Blair said it was a triumph of diplomacy over force. From his statement:

This courageous decision by Colonel Gaddafi is an historic one. I applaud it.

It will make the region and the world more secure. It shows that problems of proliferation can, with good will, be tackled through discussion and engagement, to be followed up by the responsible international agencies. It demonstrates that countries can abandon programmes voluntarily and peacefully.

<snip>

Today's announcement shows that we can fight this menace through more than purely military means; that we can defeat it peacefully, if countries are prepared, in good faith, to work with the international community to dismantle such weapons.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. look at the thread directly below this one on the front page

The irony is unmistakeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think our party should point out over and over that bush lied
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 02:27 PM by nu_duer
We should do it until the label sticks. Our party, our candidates, our eventual nominee.

All this doubletalk and retro-justification (not all coming from repugs, btw) should be met with one word - liar.

Over and over. Because its the truth. And no amount of rationalizing now will change that.

Bush lied to the nation.

Bush is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's nice that Iraq is safer and all...
But we're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why doesn't someone just ask Khadafi?
Impartial BBC reporter
Mr. Khadafi what were your reasons for seeking the end of your WMD program?

Khadafi
Libya for many years has sought to return to the world communtiy and engage in benefitial economic transactions with other countries, to this end our abandonment of WMD development is part of that process and not the result of American coercision.

Right-wing
Lies, Lies! Libya is evil cause Saint Raygun told me so!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why don't they have the repugnican national convention in Baghdad
or the area around Tikrit then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Can we continue bombing if that happens? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Totally wrong.


Lybia wanted improved relations with us years ago but Clinton would not allow it until the Lockerbie bombing issue was resolved. Bush took the same stance.

So yeah, just more Bush admin bullshit of tying things together that don't have any connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wadestock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Carefully crafted "concept reversals" are being generated.....
The republican war machine is going into the war mode....

They will infiltrate the media with statements, sound bites, and carefully crafted thought implanting techniques to get people to accept the reverse of the truth.

It's a technique that Rush Limbaugh has guided them on for years now. If you listen to them, they have organized around much of what Limbaugh airs in recent broadcasts.

My favorite one that they have promoted and which Limbaugh started perhaps a few years ago is:

"They just don't have any message".
"You know...you listen to them and you sit there thinking....what exactly are you trying to say. Do these people have any morals...etc....."

People who drive home from work who are tired, overworked, frustrated, and don't have time to think through the issues are prey for this onslaught of brainwashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You are correct, and it is all coordinated...
...someone posted this last week, it is very telling.

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/10/27_lakoff.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Will it be 'safer' 'better' for Iraqi women?
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/033/wash/Iraqi_women_could_lose_rights_:.shtml

snip...

" Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said that in the newspaper piece, Wolfowitz ''gushed over efforts to assist women in Iraq, but failed to mention the pending reversal of women's rights laws on June 30.''

''I would hope that Mr. Wolfowitz and this administration aren't viewing this situation through rose-colored glasses,'' she said in a press release issued with the letter to Bush.

''There is a women's rights crisis on the horizon in Iraq, and we must take action while we still have a say in the matter,'' Maloney said. "

Oh right these are repubs who are saying Iraq is safer. To hell with the women and their rights...

Thanks to JudiLynn from this LBN thread for bringing this article to my attention in the first place.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=343703#344281

Jax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Two Points
1. I didn't know it was the responsibility of the American military to make other countries safe.

2. In any case, Iraq isn't safe. It's on the verge of civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. From Pres' speech
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. ASK THE SOLDIERS IN IRAQ HOW "SAFE" THEY FEEL
WHAT UTTER F***ING BULLSHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC