Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton and Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:19 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton and Iraq
The repubs and media whores keep saying, "well Clinton said the same thing about Iraq's WMD threat as President Bush." There are 2 things wrong with this statement:

1. President Clinton never described the Iraqi WMD threat on the same level as Bush and with as much certainty. Clinton never said that we could be attacked in 45 minutes and that Saddam had connections to terrorist groups. Clinton never used the word "mushroom cloud." I hope you get my point here.

2. Yes, Clinton said that Saddam could have WMD programs. And when Saddam did not allow the UNSCOM inspectors in some locations in Iraq in 1998....Clinton then bombed those locations and other parts of Iraq that intelligence and the inspectors believe contained WMDs. Clinton did all of this (Desert Fox) without one US soldier dieing. Most of the military, UN inspectors and our intelligence believed that after 1998 (and with the help of the Gulf War and UNSCOM)we destroyed 90% - 95% of Iraq's WMD and its programs and infrastructure. So yes, Clinton did say that Iraq most likely had some WMD but then he did something about it by destroying whatever was remaining.

It does not make any logical sense for the Repubs and media whores to say Clinton said the same thing as the Bush WH with regards to WMD vecause: (1) Clinton did not, and (2) he bombed Iraq for 5 days in 1998 to destroy whatever was left over.

Am I making sense here because I have not heard many others making this argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton needs to be more vocal addressing the criticisms against him
His commentary could swing public opinion on the outcome of BadIntelligenceGate.

Yet all I hear is silence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I haven't heard anything from him in months
Must have a new girlfriend or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I saw Big Dog...
on C-SPAN last week at the world economic summett...he got a standing ovation while Cheney put everyone to sleep...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. He met with senior Dems last week
to give them advice on how to win back the white house, the house, and the senate. Enough with the "must have a new girlfriend or something" crap. That just plays into the hands of the RNC and you know they're reading what we write and loving it whenever somebody says something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree and you make alot of sense to me.
Republicans will try to twist and turn things around so that "it's Clinton's fault" (they always put the blame onto others because they can't take responsibility for their own actions.) BUSH AND HIS BUDDIES KNEW exactly what they were doing by going into Iraq and THEY KNEW what weapons Iraq had(which was zero). These people turn my stomach.
RE-ELECT A DEMOCRAT 2004!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I also have another point on this
I think Clinton would have "loved" to have been a wartime President (aka FDR, Truman) if history had thrust a "Just War" on him. But he looked at the Intel, knew Saddam was contained, weak, and was just spending his money building grandiouse palaces to himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree with you....
By the way, I did a Lexis/Nexis check on statements made by repubs in congress during Desert Fox and it is too funny...most repubs were saying that Clinton was bombing Iraq because to take away attention from MonicaGate and that Iraq does not possess a threat to anyone.....I would laugh if it was not so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You ought to post the Desert Fox comments
Sounds like good Ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Yes please
post whatever you have. I would love to have that stuff as ammo. Not many of us have access to lexis/Nexis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Been trying to login into Lexis....
site seems to be down...will post it when the site goes back up.....sorry for the delay....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. All of this Clinton talk from the repugs is just really old to me.
They invoke his name at their leisure. Clinton stole from the WH, Clinton wanted regime change, Clinton was a draft dodger. Clinton has been out of office for 3 years. Whatever good he did for this country has been undone by the crooks. They have spent the past three years going in the opposite direction of Clinton and they have been doing it intentionally. Now we are suppose to believe they actually followed Clinton's Iraq plan???? Yeah right.

The best thing the dems could do right now is get Madeline Albright out on the circuit. She knew what the policies were and she will set the people straight. I saw her on Charlie Rose a month or so ago and she was great. She is a smart lady who doesn't put up with shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. The difference is:
Clinton acted to protect americans. He didn't invade to illegally occupy another nation and steal its natural resources. Bush invaded Iraq to profit his cronies and solve energy problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
macdevo Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well he did mention WMD
Clinton did mention WMD. Far be it from me to protect the repukes and monkeyboy, but Clinton did say this:

"And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

Just thought I'd mention that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Right....
that is my point....and aftre he said that Clinton bombed the hell out of Iraq for 5 staright days in Desert Fox and destroyed the WMD programs by just about all accounts. So it is really meaningless to know what Clinton had to say because he destroyed their WMD programs in Desert Fox. After Desert Fox most intelligence communities believed we destroyed %90-%95 of their WMD. So what is the logic of the repubds and media whores (i.e., wolf blitzer)to tell people what Clinton had to say about Iraq's WMD before Clinton bombed them and destroyed it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. shot and
score. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. I just saw it again....
Senator Pat Roberts and Rummy together said that Clinton was saying in 1998 that "we cannot allow Saddam to have WMD...." When will a Dem attack back and say "that is why we bombed Iraq in 1998 and so what was the reason we invaded in 2003?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The republican attack machine is just much more coordinated
and vast than ours. We have to stay on top of this. Write to every news organization that lets this crap get by without it being refuted. We are the new silent majority and we have to start speaking up for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree.....
but I have not heard one Dem on TV answer back and say that after Clinton made the statements about Iraq's WMD he bombed Sadaam for 5 staright days and by almost all accounts pretty much destroyed all of Saddam's WMD (just ask Scott Ritter). For example, last night Joe Scarborough tells Tweety that Clinton said the same thing about Iraq anfd WMD and then Dee Dee Myers give some lame answer and acting very defensive. Whst is it about the Dem talking heads....are they simply uninformed? Stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. REGIME CHANGE

Yes, Clinton did have a policy of regime change.

For reference, the US has had a policy of regime change in Cuba for 40 years. We haven't invaded yet.

Oh yeah, and we also have a ONE China policy. But there are two Chinas.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC