|
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 01:09 PM by DrBB
Look, you don't need an "investigation" to know that shit floats downstream. There's nothing an "investigation," independent or otherwise, hobbled or not, 18-month or 5-minute, is going to find out that isn't patently obvious. I won't even waste my time listing all the sources that show how laughable this whole claim that "The CIA made us do it!" is.
This bogus, Bush-controlled "investigation" is worse news for the right than it is for us. The reichpundits are already floundering--did you see Hoagland's complete, embarrassing 180 in the WaPo? He's trying to toe the party line, blame the CIA for poor innocent W's (and Cheney's) mistakes, but there it is, from last year: his own article crowing about how the Adults are forcing the feckless, cautious, wrong-headed CIA to acknowledge the "truth" about Iraq. The Post was so mortified, they actually pulled the earlier article, and then got caught and had to put it back up again.
Where this hurts the most? Not among the pundits and the apparatchiks who have to echo the talkingpoints or know Rove's wrath. Nope. It's going to hurt their base. The poor benighted, yet sincere believers who have held on and held on. Some may use the "investigation" as a way to pretend they don't know what they know. But they'll still know it, as will many more who will be able to admit it (we've seen some of 'em come over to DU in just the last few days). This is a leech that is going to suck the life out of 'em. Not as quickly or dramatically as we like. But they are bleeding. And the "investigation" by its mere existence is a tacit admission that they LIED, that they FUCKED UP and don't have any more smarmy, smug answers. They are down to damage control, and there are big limitations to what they can do.
|