|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:00 PM Original message |
Poll question: It's February 2, 2005. A Democrat is in the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. followup question for #2 voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. The business at hand is undoing the last 4 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. LMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Restoring fiscal sanity by raising taxes on the super-rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. what about corporate taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Yes, corporate welfare should be drastically scaled back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Raising taxes on top 2% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. It wil still be in GOP hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. This situation would be the open door we need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. what do you see us achieving in such an order? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. 1. Enact an executive order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. Above and articulating a new energy policy to confront the future problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 04:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC