Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Draft...coming back?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:29 PM
Original message
The Draft...coming back?
I keep reading on various sites that Draft Boards have been reactivated in some areas... any truth to this?

If true THIS would certainly give the Soccermoms something to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. soldiers are getting rotated from Iraq to Afghanistan with no rest
Of course there will be a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Absolut Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Supposedly
The draft will start again on June 15th, 2005, but this topic has been started before and we don't know if it's normal proceedure or there are gearing up for a draft according to the budgetary report. I actually didn't know what the agreed upon notion was on this board. I would say it's starting up, it makes me hate Bush more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. From what I've read, draft boards are quietly being staffed
and are under orders to be up and running within a certain amount of time, I forget what. The administation denies that this means anything. Reinlistments are way down and people are being forced to stay in the military. Of course there will be a draft. It will start with medical and other "essential" personnel, including linguists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. this should be a front and center issue
IF the draft is in fact coming back, it seems to me this would become the single biggest issue to bring Bush down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Would my kids have to go?
They are draft age and healthy, but have campaigned against Bush, for Democrats, and marched against the invasion. Would they qualify as Consci's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Probably not. Only the poor will be told to go
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 01:56 PM by DuctapeFatwa
the draft thus serves the dual purpose of providing disposable military resources for the purposes of imposing America's will on its properties around the globe, where terrorist factions may be plotting to steal American oil, and simultaneously reduce the number of undesirables within the US itself.

edit to change title to "will be told to go," since it is inaccurate to say that anyone will HAVE to go, since whether to obey regime decrees is a personal decision that can be made only by the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I would rather they NOT take
rich-kids deferments like student or Nat Guard or fake 4F's like Limpballs got (though we probably have the means). I would rather they get relief based on conscience, for which they both qualify. IOW, I would prefer they make an issue of staying home instead of just quietly refusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good for you, and good for them! If there is an American Friends Svc

committee (Quakers) in your community, they are some good folks to go to for information for conscientious objectors :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. you need to do some research
wish I had the links handy but, registering for CO status is going to be much more difficult under bushco. (as is any thought of a flight to canada. they've shut that down already)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. No. Conscientious objectors usually do so on
religious grounds, and even then it's not that easy. Protesting W makes you unpatriotic, not undesirable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justsam Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. there are several
problems with a draft
(1) to serve in the military, a person has to be drug free so if they don't want to go, it's simple, don't go to canada, just smoke a joint and fail the test
(2) they have to be a high school grad-- so who goes to war, the kids that stay in school, the drop-outs stay home and do what ever drop outs do, they sure as hell aren't going to find a job in America.

(3) I think a draft is good and i think everyone should serve the military in some capacity, but remember the war on drugs that was declared in the 70s, we have to finish that one first. remember no kid left behind, we have to follow up on that one also, then maybe in 40 yrs we could have a fair draft with everyone doing their service.
I am an Army veteran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I read somewhere
a bunch of reservists failed their drug tests and they sent them to Iraq anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I read that report
also..seems they don't care if you're drugged up or not..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justsam Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. they probably did,
if i were in the military now and got called, i wouldn't say anything about being on drugs either, could wind up in the slammer for a few years instead of doing a little duty- plus lose all the time built up toward a pension-- it's a hard call, take a chance on not getting killed or lose 10-15 yrs on a pension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush or Kerry will set it in motion in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Kerry?????????Why do you say this?????????
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. He has said he doesnt think it's needed "at this time"

Iraq is a big country, and it is taking more assets than they thought to secure America's oil. Iran is also a big country, with a much larger population that will need to be reduced and put down, and that will require more assets. Syria is not large, and the US can deploy its Israeli assets there, but any way you look at it, they will definitely need more bodies as the crusade expands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justsam Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Kerry can't do anything until Jan,2005
and I don't think Bush would have the balls to say anything about a draft now, his war isn't going according to their plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. pullease.Edwards or Lieberman would do the same.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 05:38 PM by Algorem
of those whoever gets elected or "elected" has the say so in November,they'll announce it after inauguration but it'll be all ready to go by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Do a search on posts by Dems Will Win
(note the spaces in name) This person has been following the issue closely and has posted several times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. I just got my draft board application a few days ago.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 04:26 PM by MercutioATC
I'll be sending it in this week :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justsam Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. you can
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 04:32 PM by justsam
register on line and get your card back in 14 days..
www.sss.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Card? The packet says that there's an interview...
I used the website to apply a month or two ago and I just jot the packet.

Supposedly, as long as I qualify (which I do) they'll schedule an interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. You rang?? This is Dems Will Win. Here are some past links.
We must unite and toss Bush out or we will have a compulsory DRAFT! 20 year-olds first. First possible DRAFT LOTTERY is June 15, 2005. See below:

November, 2003 – Selective Service 2004 “Performance Plan” summarizes how $28 million will be allocated in 2004 to reduce draft activation time from current 8 months to just 75 days. Nation-wide Readiness Exercises, testing the Draft Lottery and examination system, as well as gearing up the Medical Draft (3.4 million doctors and nurses, men and women age 20-44 are eligible). Ominously, the Alternative Service delivery system for Conscientious Objectors is readied for the first time in decades, with the SSS being funded to compile lists of available Alternative Service jobs for those who win non-military CO status. All systems will be pushed to reach 95% readiness during 2004.
http://www.sss/gov/perfplan_fy2004.html

Nov. 23, 2003 – Boston Globe article: “Army Reserve battling an exodus
War is seen as drain on ranks. The US Army Reserve fell short of its reenlistment goals this fiscal year, underscoring Pentagon fears that the protracted conflict in Iraq could cause a crippling exodus from the armed services.”
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2003/11/23/army_reserve_battling_an_exodus/

Nov. 24, 2003 – NY Times: Army plans for 100,000 troops until 2006 in Iraq.
http://www.iht.com/articles/118775.html

Nov. 26, 2003 – Ron Paul (R-TX) says “Draft likely to be reinstated”. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul144.html

December, 2003 - Draft Board Recruitment ad re-appears on the Selective Service Home Page with 2 new sentences stressing the ad has “NO connection” to Iraq. http://www.sss.gov

Dec. 4, 2003 – Ted Rall predicts Bush will “have to bring back the draft.” Notes 8,000 empty Draft Board seats to be filled by Spring 2005. Wonders about a “February (2005) Surprise” if Bush is re-elected. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=127&ncid=742&e=7&u=/uclicktext/20031204/cm_ucru/acolddraft

December 22, 2003 – In an article entitled “Beware of Attempts to Revive Military Draft,” Newsday reports that “the Center on Conscience and War… executive director, J. E. McNeil… has heard of rumblings, from the Republican side of the aisle in Congress, about a draft after the election”. The opinion piece worries whether a revived draft “would give this war-without-end presidency an endless source of warm bodies to pursue its cowboy foreign policy.” Author Keeler also wonders about a “February (2005) Surprise”.
http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpkee223594883dec22,0,6735184.story?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines

December, 2003 – Dennis Kucinich releases and airs ad on draft: “Listen up, young America… you could be facing a Compulsory Draft!” http://resources.kucinich.us/video/video/listen_up/listen_up_real_broadband.ram

December, 2003 - The Selective Service Register magazine talks about the new Special Skill Draft, a top priority for Director Lewis Brodsky. Like the Medical Draft, the Special Skills Draft will induct men and women up to age 44 if they have needed DoD skills like computer expertise, engineering or they are a linguist. As with the health care draftees, no medical deferments are allowed except for total disability. Anyone with these skills will have to register with the SSS if Bush is re-elected and asks Congress for this. Moving quickly!
http://www.sss.gov/PDFs/NovDec2003-Register.pdf (go to P. 6) – from sss,gov home page

December 29, 2003 - WP article: “Army Stops Many Soldiers From Quitting, Orders Extend Enlistments to Curtail Troop Shortages” 40,000 soldiers and Guard put on Stop-Loss. A “Draft Per Se” already exists! With the new stop-loss orders the Armed Forces actually go 20,000 past 480,000 active troops, to 500,000 active troops, the maximum before Congress steps in.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36979-2003Dec28.html

BUSH '04 = DRAFT '05

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. THANKS Dems Will Win
For keeping people updated on this serious issue. There's a lot of unhappy R's out there who will not be voting for shrub, if there's an election..However, people must bring this to the front fast and now because he's hiding it from the people and slipping it into his bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Exactly why I applied. I want to be "part of the process"....
Draft boards need do have responsible Democratic representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh,I'll bet guys are standing in line down at the recruitment centers...
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 07:47 PM by OneTwentyoFive
The only people lonelier than the Maytag repair man has to be the guys running the recruiting centers. Who in their right mind,or what parent who let their son or daughter get in the middle of this mess??


David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Actually
The recruiting centers are not as empty as you might think. I was in a recruiting center for the Army about 6 months ago, and there were quite a few recruits that were waiting for their ship out dates. I talked to two of them, both young women, who were anxious. Both also applauded me for my ASVAB score and were eager to know what I was going in for.

All told over the course of about two weeks I saw at least two dozen young men and women at that station that were shipping out in the coming months.

The testing center was fairly packed as well. At least 30-40 waiting for ASVAB and physical tests the day I was there.

In case anyone is interested, I am in my 30's and got shitcanned out of OCS by a Lt. Colonel, then got a medical DQ from Enlisted. Time takes its toll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Ah c'mon,,,
those freepers are going to be there in a heartbeat because they're master would ask....ya right!! Bunch of weenies would be the first to run off or shoot themselves in the leg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC