Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wouldn't it be great if..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gonefishing Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 07:35 AM
Original message
Wouldn't it be great if..
At times I have liked Colin Powell and under the right set of circumstances I might be supportive of him. With that said.

Wouldn't it be great if they pinned the whole WMD breakdown on him. They might be foolish enough to try it and boy would that backfire.

From Todays NYT:

"Mr. Powell's testimony, delivered at a moment of high suspense as American forces gathered in the Persian Gulf region, was widely seen as the most powerful and persuasive presentation of the Bush administration's case that Iraq was bristling with horrific weapons. His reputation for caution and care gave it added credibility.

A year later, some of the statements made by Mr. Powell have been confirmed, but many of his gravest findings have been upended by David A. Kay, who until Jan. 23 was Washington's chief weapons inspector."

...

"Congressional officials involved in investigations of the C.I.A. and current and former administration officials, suggest that Mr. Powell's case was largely based on limited, fragmentary and mostly circumstantial evidence, with conclusions drawn on the basis of the little challenged assumption that Saddam Hussein would never dismantle old illicit weapons and would pursue new ones to the fullest extent possible."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/01/international/middleeast/01WEAP.html?th



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. he's been a RW errand boy his whole career
he said what he was told to say at the UN.

he's totally devoid of integrity or honor. always has been so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gonefishing Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe
he said what he was told to say at the UN.

agree

he's totally devoid of integrity or honor. always has been so.

disagree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why oh why
do they constantly refer to Powells testimony at the UN.
Why don't they repeat what all the other people testified to.
Such as, Hans Blix, Ebardai, Azizz that said there were no weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC