Technology, the Internet, and Electoral Politics (Long)

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

Internet technology political innovations that have appeared in this election season are having a profound impact on this and future elections. In this election, I see all of these trends working in favor of democracy vs. plutocracy. I am sure that this will not always be the case and by future elections many ways will be found to exploit the internet to favor special interests and the coroporate oligarchy.

A lot of the innovation has to do with the relationship between money and political campaigns. At this moment, the very existence of the web and email provides a powerful force for candidates with less money by providing free or very cheap means of disseminating information via email or websites. It has the potential for both lowering the costs required for running an effective campaign, while making it easier to raise the money necessary.


Internet Fundraising:

This is one of the most important changes, highlighted by the Howard Dean campaign. It is an inherently democratizing change to change the emphasis from $2000 a plate dinners largely attended by business leaders to $100 contributions from a contributor base that is orders of magnitude larger. The concept that a serious campaign could be launched without currying favor with any powerful business interest for needed campaign funds is a revolutionary one on the American political scene. The implications of this development are many and vast. It probably has implications with respect to what kind of contributor would give to what kind of candidate. It is difficult to imagine a middle class or lower middle class voter contributing $100 via internet (like I just did to the Clark campaign while writing this essay) to the campaign of somone like Arnold Schwarzenegger whom they already know to be vastly wealthy.

"Meetups"

I don't know who is credited with this idea (my understanding is that it has originated from the Dean campaign) but I realized the brilliance of it as soon as I first logged onto a Democratic candidate website, punched in my zip code and saw how many people in my area were signed up for local meetings. I haven't been to one yet. My first is tomorrow. This is particularly important for people like me who are a tiny political minority in their area (North Dallas). I will get to meet actual people in North Dallas who are voting against Bush!

My gut feeling is that the meetup concept probably works in favor of whichever candidate or party has more grassroots energy fueling their campaign.

Dissemination of Information (Web and email vs. TV ads/mass mailing):

This should have the effect of lowering the financial barrier for candidates since I am assuming that high bandwith websites are a lot less expensive to create and host than the traditional TV spots and mass paper mailings, and email is still essentially free. The significance of this change will only reflect the degree to which people have shifted their media consumption from TV to the internet. A shift back towards corporate influence will occur if the changeover from TV to internet media is complete, and webhosting expenses and running the internet itself becomes dependent on internet advertising/corporate sponsorship.

Obtaining information on Candidate's Positions and Records:

This is clearly a vast improvement as the history of a candidate is largely available via archived news articles, government sites (for those who have been in public service) and their own sites. Entire documents and articles, and even media such as speeches and TV appearances can be downloaded and stored on hard drives and reviewed at leisure.

Decreasing the "Sound Bite" factor:

This is only as potent as the degree to which voters switch from TV to internet and other written media consumption. I know in my own case this switch has been virtually complete in the past few years. The effect of the "Dean Scream" in Iowa on his campaign certainly shows we are not there yet. A national change will probably await the greater availability and universal adoption of broadband internet in this country. Again, a written record of speeches and statements is available for review at any time. I personally feel that the extensive record of Bush administration statements in the runup to the Iraq invasion, by the President himself and various surrogates, is causing extensive problems for them at the moment despite the vigorous propaganda campaign that has been continuously waged.

The Spectre of Black Box Voting and Electoral Corruption

While most of the changes I've described have what I believe to be a democratizing effect on the current elections process, there is a great concern among many that all this could be cancelled out by the possibility of wholesale election fraud facilitated by computerized and internet voting. That this should be a powerful bipartisan issue is self evident. Anyone who believes that their candidate has the support of the people should be in favor of the most accountability possible in the voting process, including the availability of a paper trail. I don't see compelling arguments against this yet it has not been implemented into the current schemes to my knowledge. The lack of concern among those in power promoting these schemes raises suspicion of the assumption that any fraud that occurs will happen in favor of their candidate, a concern that could be easily dispelled by creating paper accountability or delaying the implementation until demonstrably more secure systems exist.

[9215]

1. TV is a more

powerful medium. You have it concentrated in the hands of so few corporations and the way they blasted Dean out of the race with criticism of his raucus speech it makes me wonder. The Internet is doing good things for sure, but the TV is the determining factor in this election and the fascists have that arena locked up tight as a drum. All they have to do is keep poking at the dems and let Bush slide and we all know where that will lead. It's like being in a boxing match with both of your hands tied behind your back.


It is a fucking disaster. Every criticism of Bush is put through the wringer and held to a rocket science standard of veracity, while every little bead of sweat or misstep by the dems is blasted over the airwaves.

I don't mean to be negative but politics in this arena is a hopeless prospect.


Bush even said this himself:

I'm basically a media creation. I've never done anything. -- George W. Bush, 1989

[Moderator]

2. Locking

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator