Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what "Gore states" does Bush have a realistic shot in?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
uconnyc Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 07:56 PM
Original message
what "Gore states" does Bush have a realistic shot in?
if the election is not a complete blowout.

I know we've gone over this a lot. Just wanted to know as I play with the electoral map on JRE's website.

I presume Iowa, WI and PA. How about CA, MI, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The election is not going to be a complete blow-out
It is going to be like 2000, no matter what Bush does the Repukes are still going to stand behind him (anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a dream world).

We are going to have to pay close attention to what happened in Florida in 2000, In a couple of States this November to make sure it does not happen again. If it goes unchecked we will definitely get four more years of Hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blurp Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Better machines will do what in FL?
It will be very interesting to see what the results since most of the state(all?) has gotten rid of punch cards.

There were many spoiled ballots in 2000. In fact, in those precincts with large African-American populations, the overall rate of spoilage was up to 31% higher than the rest of the state.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What about all the people who's vote didn't count
Because of a fraudulent felon list? How will machines help that? How will machines help voter intimidation at the polls asking for 5 pieces of ID?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Iowa... But it will be really bad if Nader runs... Because then you got...
to watch out for Washington and Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Watch out for...
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. It depends a lot upon who our nominee is.
We *should* nominate someone who has the common touch that Clinton has, one who can get non-ideological voters to connect with him, the so-called 'chemistry' factor. Al Gore, for all his virtues really lacked that property.

I fear we are about to nominate someone else who lacks it, possibly even more than Gore did. If we do, bush could have a shot at a lot of Gore's states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Florida & New Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. He has a chance in Florida.
California - no way. Michigan - yes, Bush has a shot. I don't know about the others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Oregon, Iowa, Minnesota, New Mexico
Washington

NOW...some states Shrub ought to watch out for:

New Hampshire, Missouri, Florida, Arkansas, Kentuky, Tennessee, etc. We have a shot in these if the cards are played correctly. And the election is not totally rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC