911 Question - Has there EVER been any proof who the hi-jackers were?

[cthrumatrix]

Aside from the photo's that "the media" published 36 hours after the planes hit.

From my understanding:
----------------------
* There were no passnger lists that had these "hi-jackers" on it. Who gave the media the photo's and said "print it"? How did they know?

* We were told they had fake-id's and boarded the planes. So how do we know who they were...if they used fake id's? Investigate each person presumably on the plane...were they really on it...or was their ID stolen.


I have never seen any proof...and yet "the spin" with an Afghan passport allows us to take out a country and start this madness.

There needs to be a 911 investigation. And an investigation would be supported IF people cannot answer the most simple and logical questions.

I would like to see a Senator ask this of the 911 commission. I know this was not thier objective. This and many other questions are still "unanswered"....and we accept this?

I suspect... with just the slightest investigation and more questions...this would bring this adminstration and many others down.

[gandalf]

1. Good question

I have no experience in forensic medicine, but if I saw a burned body in a wrecked and burned plane, it would be hard to discriminate between a normal passenger and a hijacker. Especially if there were (perhaps apart from flight 93) no visible plane remnants, not in the WTC debris, not in or in front of the Pentagon.
People who defend the "official version" of the events often say "the Boeing disintegrated" while hitting the Pentagon (and that's why you can hardly detect any debris -- so they claim). Assume this would be true, it would be nearly impossible to examine the bodies.
So what is then the basis for deciding who were the terrorists among the passengers?

[rfranklin]

2. Something stinks about the whole scenario...

There has never been an explanation of how they came up with the list of supposed hijackers. At least four of them are still alive, i.e., they were never on the airplances as the government claimed. As on thread here discussed, the lawyer for one of the families of 9/11 victims wants to bring those four into court to prove the total BS of the "official version." It smells to high heaven!

[mopaul]

3. hell no......the whole story stinks

the very day after the attack, there were the faces of the hijackers, and their names, neatly arranged on a poster for the public consumption. how did that happen so fast? and mohammud atta's wallet found in the trade center debris? what are the odds of that?
no other wallets were found, but that one miraculously survived the inferno and was not buried in debris.

the official story was that it was 15 saudis among the 19 so called hijackers. so we attack afghanistan and then iraq? it was instantly blamed on one man, osama. our pres bleated loudly, 'we're gonna git im', dead or alive'. we all know how that went.

and why would the so called hijackers be seen in many public places, including girlie bars, and leave copies of the koran laying about?
why would atta go to a flight training school and ask how to use a crop duster, and mention how easy it would be for a terrorist to poison half a million people? an employee of this particular flight school told this tale. why would he do that?

what ever the official story is, believe the opposite. as a professional conspiracy nut, it is not impossible that it could have been done by remote control. they can do that now you know. a big airliner can take off, go across the ocean, and land safely WITHOUT A PILOT. they've been doing it for years.