Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Let Me Get This Straight. You Impeach A President For A Lie About

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DEM FAN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:39 AM
Original message
So Let Me Get This Straight. You Impeach A President For A Lie About
Adultery BUT You Don't Impeach A President Who Sent Men And Women
To Iraq To Fight A War And DIE On A LIE. WHAT Am I Missing Something.
A LIE For Crying Out Loud. :-(errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
right is wrong Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are missing
the Republican gene
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valjean Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Impeaching Bush IS STUPID!!!!

Really, just drop the whole annoying topic.

1) Bush has broken NO laws. Nor is he even CLOSE to having broken a law. There are two issues with legal ramifications pending. The Valerie Plame issue, and the Congressional computer spying issue. NEITHER of these involve Bush directly.

2) Bill Clinton "fudged" under oath. Neither the category nor the action hitting the "high crimes and misdemeanors" threshold. The issue was completely manufactured by a lying slut. But they still had a case on psuedo-perjury. Many people considered that perjury (which IS a felony) so they had some political backing.

3) Convicting Bill Clinton would have been the WORST thing for the Republicans to do. It would have given Al Gore to show his stuff in a job that ALL the Republicans knew he could do well. As it is, a Veep lives in the shadow of the president. So smearing the President also smears the Veep. Promoting Al Gore to President would have let Al Gore shine.

Likewise, impeaching Bush would accomplish NOTHING. First, there is an election in 10 MONTHS!!!! Second, Impeaching Bush would only promote Dick Cheney. Third, you would give an opportunity for John McCain to become the number one candidate. This year, I would say that John McCain would be a STRONGER candidate than Bush.

The biggest thing Bush has for him is incumbency and $200 million dollars. Just like Daddy, his poor performance and distracting tactics are wearing off. Daddy didn't lose his job because he lost the right. He served his core supporters admirably, oil and defense industries. He failed to serve the center that was pissed at a poorly performing economy.

Bush finds himself in WORSE condition because of Iraq reconstruction. It's becoming the desert version of Vietnam over there. We're losing about ten a week over there. Thats forty a month. In ten months, there could likely be another 400 soldiers DEAD. Imagine what THAT will do for his re-election hopes.

Even now there is a real threat that both the Kurds and Sunnis will lose patience and go into full revolt or civil war. And then what an absolute MESS the region will be. The Shiites will turn to help from Iran. The Sunnis would press for Syrian involvement. We would be forced to support are only reliable ally (Kurds) against the Sunnis and Shiites and prevent any Turkish involvement. To sum up, Iraq could become a GIANT FUCKING MEGA-MESS VERY SOON!!!!

There is an ARMY of veterans out there that absolutely DESPISE Bush for cutting Veterans benefits (privatizing) so harshly. Most of the people in Iraq HATE Bush for this mess. Bush is pretty lucky that the Pentagon brass can manipulate their vote at will now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So how do we see Bush* punished for his misdeeds?
After all, he may not have lied under oath, but sure as hell lied to 200 million Americans......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valjean Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It doesn't matter

Nothing Bush has done comes to the level of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". The only punishment possible is a resounding election defeat.

If I could, I would take away all his wealth and cast him into a pit. But the law does not allow for that.

We of higher mind must be consistent. We can rightfully point out the hypocrisy of others but cannot hold other to higher standards than we hold ourselves. If you did not believe in the Clinton impeachment, you cannot possibly believe in a Bush impeachment.

Congress GAVE the president authority to make war on Iraq. A great many Democrats voted for this. We were duped. But there is no law against manipulating intelligence for political gain. We cannot prosecute someone ex-post-facto, it is unconstitutional.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What? Manipulating intelligence is indeed a crime.
- What makes you think that a government manipulating (lying) about intelligence and taking a country to war based on a lie is NOT a crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. It is a crime. But so was Bu$h v Gore. Under the thumb press helps alot.
Does it not?
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. What election defeat? Those gopers OWN the election Even if not ONE
single person voted for bush, they'd STILL appoint the twit... we know how they operate. We know how they are...

The question then becomes, 'what do WE do to assure fair and honest elections?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Nothing Bush has done comes to the level of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors?
Lying to congress is a high crime and misdemeanor the last time I checked....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. Would you say awarding rebuilding contracts a year before engagement
to be legal? It has been brought out in recent disclosures that Haliburton was awarded their No-Bid Contract in early 2001 for Iraq. I would suggest that is illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. The last time I checked
lying to Congress is perjury, which is a "high crime."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valjean Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Bush wasn't under oath

You must take an oath before one is considered having committed perjury. Beyond this, we don't even know if the Chimp was allowed to know such minor details. He may have just demanded reasons and he was given them.

It's the administration that has lied and deceived in an institutional way. True, the skipper is asleep at the wheel but the law doesn't permit prosecution of CEOs who criminally allow their organizations to commit crimes through lack of oversight.

I hate the man as much as the next guy. But he hasn't committed any offense that warrants impeachment. The election is in 9 months. Thats the ultimate recall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. If he could be tied to veote fraud then it would be high crimes
but that'll never happen. They learned alot from the Nixon days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. He lied to Congress-which is treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. BOO. Sex. Golf. Same thing.
Irrelevent.

Bush lied under oath on his state's funeral home scam.

He was accused of perjury too.

Then he stole a whole frickin election.
Whatta guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I didn't ask him that question.
He did not lie to me.

Your priorities are seriously sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. How many people died because of Clinton's lies about sex?
- Well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Bush lied. Thousands died.
Bush has now killed more innocent people than bin Laden has.

Are Bush's turds chewy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. My solution
Definitely DO NOT impeach. Especially not in an election year. Just keep handing him enough rope to hang himself.

The punishment will be Bush losing his job come November.

I'll settle for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Bush broke laws....
he lied to congress when he sent them a letter requesting that body to pass his resolution. He also lied to congress during the state of the union speech in 2002. Lying to Congress is a federal offense. Also, playing around with the intelligence and pressuring the CIA to give them what they wanted is a high crime and misdemeanor....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Our constitution forbids us from launching an unprovoked war for one
He has clearly broken international law with his unprovoked wars. I am dead certain he has broken many laws but we are not allowed an investigation. It's just like his insider trading, his whitewashed AWOL and cocaine use status. Just because his powerful family is hiding his crimes does not mean they didn't occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. By the way....
John Dean is coming out with a book called, WORSE THAN WATERGATE, where he goes into all of Bush High Crimes and Misdemeanoers....should be a great read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Bush * is a war criminal!
Read Ramsey Clark's Articles of Impeachment.

"President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General John David Ashcroft have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:"

http://www.votetoimpeach.org/articles_rc.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Wrong-O as Hell Gumpy
Edited on Thu Jan-29-04 07:22 PM by rustydog
The invasion of Iraq violated international law. Impeachabel offense number 1.

10 days after taking office, Bush told the National Security council mambers to make an iraq invasion happen. they followed those orders. NOW, if in following those orders, they followed PNAC, you have a CONSPIRACY, impeachment material number 2.
If they ACTED on the conspiracy, that is another impeachable crime.

Tha FACT that he lied to take the country to war directly causing the deaths of over 500 troops for no real or legal reason may well be impeachable.
This does need to be discussed at every turn. This is NOT a "get over it" thing either.
These bastards need to pay and if they are hit by a shotgun blast of issues from EVERY angle, it will be hard for him to fight back.

Waiting for Iraq to disintegrate even more only allows more Americans to die for Bush*s War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. No Crime?? 10,000 dead I-raqi civilians beg to differ
Bush War was a crime against humanity.

Impeach the motherfucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Three words why we don't impeach:
President Dick Cheney.

The Bush clan is pretty good at picking horrible vice presidents to keep their jobs secure. Remebr Quayle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Yup. Quayle's a PNAC guy too. They have been pushing their dream
for a long time. He's still on the "Defense" Advisory Board, isn't he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. yep, you got it
killing for greed is acceptable
sex for pleasure is not

there are Lies and then there are Lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. The Pubs seem to have weird sexual hangups leaving them mindless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. You've noticed that, too, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Does it not depend whose greed we're talking about?
Cuz we all know that the republican hasn't the desire for sex, except to procreate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Ummm... sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
23. Their philosophy is if they don't get caught--it's OK
So they maintain the highest levels of secrecy in history; revise and scrub official documents, seal other documents, control all questions asked by the press and then sell the press to their cronies to guarantee silence around their antics. Then they work fervently to place election stealing computers in order to place their people in the majority to further ensure that even if they are brought up on charges, they are dismissed. The bottom line is, it is highly unlikely we'll see someone at Bush's level perjured or even investigated the way Clinton was. And, it is also likely the next dem president will be heavily investigated and smeared in the press. It's a no-win situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. They can't be 'perjured' because they refuse...
...to testify about anything under oath. That's why you'll see none of the Bush* cabal testifying about 9-11...even though they were 'in charge' at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. Don't Impeach. Indict.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. It's the thin line of plausible deniability n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC