Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RWer admits he was wrong!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:58 AM
Original message
RWer admits he was wrong!!!!
(Mods: please allow this cross-post with E&A for a wider audience...)

Lengthy admission of being duped by Bushco... very David Brock-like.

Snip:

More importantly, though, half the things I wrote back then were devoid of actual substance. I didn't have ideas. I had suggestions. I had templates. I applied them to whatever topic was hot, and voila! I had an article. Which is a fine way to make a deadline, sure, but it's really not so fulfilling. Take, for example, this gem from my February 25, 2003, article, "Time, Like France, Is Not On Our Side": "You know, it's not that I've ever taken things for granted, but my deep appreciation for American life only really settled in on September 11th. The feeling has yet to let me go."

Well, that's great and all, but what the hell was I saying? It didn't mean anything. Watch me change the words: "You know, it's not that I've ever taken the Canadian porn industry for granted, but my deep appreciation for it only really settled in when I witnessed Taliban porn firsthand. The feeling has yet to let me go." And you see, much like Mad Libs, a few changed words didn't change the substance one lick.

And I'll tell you the thing that gets me now is I really, truly believed at the time that that was one of my finest articles ever. At the time, it probably was. But I wrote a lot of stuff like that during the build-up to the Second Gulf War. I was still in a woe-is-me, post-9/11 rut back then, and I went along with the war without thinking critically or questioning a damn thing. This bothers me now because, regardless of whether I support my having supported it, I would've done well to have followed less blindly -- as a writer, as an American, as a man.

In that very same article on February 25, I wrote: "I don't want this war… anymore than the next guy." That sounded nice when I wrote it, but it wasn't exactly true. I mean, of course I wanted the war more than the next guy. I was rooting for it with thousand-word diatribes each and every Tuesday. The least I could've done is not lied about it. But, indeed, I was the one I was lying to. It was one of those you're-only-fooling-yourself moments, and I fell for it.
End snip.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/morris/2004/morris012704.htm

original DU thread here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=31815#31861
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's always
great to see something like that! Now, if only we could get a lot more repukes to see the light!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone ought to e-mail this article to Dennis MIller.
Good points about thinking uncritically about our country after 9/11. NEVER think uncritically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. My email to the author...
Just read your Jan 27 piece and want to compliment you on publicly "seeing the light". It takes a REAL man to admit when he's wrong, and it's rarely seen in this day of blustery, faux machismo.

I don't expect you to come over to the side of light and bright, though you're certainly welcome to the Big Tent!

Thank you,



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Men's News Daily is certainly an...uh... interesting place.
And they actually published the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Having been a conservative a few years back...
the part about "I was the one I was lying to" is really true. For the most part, your average Conservative isn't being intentionally deceptive...its just that they've been so deceived by those in power that they actually believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabbit of Caerbannog Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uh - ok...
I guess for a hyper-conservative rag the article is pretty unique. No doubt the author is now off their payroll, or will be soon. I commend him on most of his points up until the end where he states: "As part of this, I'm going to get off my lazy rear end and learn how to use a gun already. I've been meaning to do so for ages. I plan on doing so soon.". Maybe this last statement is intended to prove he is worthy of wearing the "REAL MAN" label. "LOUD, PROUD & UNBOWED" indeed.

I'd like to see what he and his gun can do against the next passenger jet hurtling towards him, or to prevent someone from some foreign (on not) government from slipping a large bomb in via a shipping container...

I think I'd rather trust my luck to a new administration that isn't hell bent on pissing off every other country on the planet while at the same time subverting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights under the guise of protecting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC