Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AWOL a non-issue? Maybe. But suspension is another story.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:56 PM
Original message
AWOL a non-issue? Maybe. But suspension is another story.
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 12:10 AM by BurtWorm
The following is an unfinished article I worked on last year. It isn't finished because I don't have all the details to make a conclusion. All I have is a strong suspicion based on some very unsettling information about George W. Bush and his career in the Texas Air National Guard. In GD P2004, there's a thread asking how much of an issue Bush's alleged AWOL period really is. I don't know the answer to that question, but I do think it's important for Americans to think about that episode in their "president"'s life and what it means about his present position. So, without further ado, here it is:



Bush, Bath and Beyond

By Burt Worm


In the summer of 1972, two buddies in the Texas Air National Guard stationed at Ellington Air Force Base near Houston lost their flying privileges, which had cost tax payers nearly $1 million apiece to train them for, over the same technicality: "failure to accomplish annual medical exam."

If not for the fact that one of these suspended guardsmen grew up to take possession of the White House nearly 30 years later, these suspensions and the document that recorded them would probably have remained lost to history. But in the summer of 2000, as packs of America's highest paid journalists diligently transcribed talking points on Al Gore's alleged character flaws faxed directly from the Republican National Committee, an Iowa farmer named Marty Heldt rescued the document amid a thick folder of other materials on Texas Governor George W. Bush's checkered career in the Champagne Squadron of TANG obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. That document can be viewed online at http: //users.cis.net/coldfeet/grounded.gif. (delete space between colon and slashes for link.)

While many Bush watchers may wonder about the unproven (and probably unprovable) claim that George W. Bush was absent without leave from TANG between May 1972 and June 1973 (a claim that I believe, by the way, for what it's worth), many overlook the related and more troubling anomaly in Bush's Guard service, an anomaly that Bush himself does not dispute. During election year 2000, Bush acknowledged that he had been suspended from flying, but he excused himself by saying he was in Alabama at the time and couldn't get to his personal physician to take the required physical. There are two glaring problems with this excuse: The required medical exams, instituted that very year, were to be conducted by authorized Air Force physicians only, not just any personal physician, and they didn?t have to be taken in Texas. More troublesome, Bush was suspended on August 1; he didn't leave Texas to work on a family friend's Congressional campaign in Alabama until late September.

Okay, so Bush--how shall I put this delicately?--was not "accurate" about something he did or didn't do 30 years ago. What's the big deal? Did anybody but the most rabid Clinton-haters really care about a failed land deal the Clintons made with Jim and Susan McDougal in the late 1970s? If Whitewater was ultimately irrelevant to Bill Clinton's ability to be president during his term, why would an indiscretion of Bush's youth be any more relevant to his own "presidency?" Is this a sleeping dog that should be left to lie?

I don't think so. I think Bush's suspension in 1972 is highly relevant to his situation and to the Americans he "presides" over in 2003. The suspension is the beginning of a thread that winds through Bush's unusually profitable business failures, wraps around the Iran-Contra scandal, connects to BCCI, and ultimately unravels on September 11, 2001. It is not the presence of Bush's name alone, I believe, that makes this document a key to the mysteries of post-Watergate Republicanism in America. I believe what makes this such a valuable document to historians hoping to understand why we are where are is the name under Bush's on that recovered page: James R. Bath.

A little history should clarify the significance of this juxtaposition.

In late 1972, Richard Nixon, freshly re-elected when Watergate was still but a whisper in the nation's ear, named George H.W. Bush to head the Republican National Committee. Nixon had been grooming the elder Bush for greater and greater responsibilities since he had decided (wrongly) that Bush had a chance to take a Senate seat from the Democrats in 1970. According to the late James Hatfield, author of the unjustly notorious Bush Jr. biography Fortunate Son, Nixon used his own daughter, Tricia, to lure Bush Sr. into the race by offering her as a date to Bush Jr. in 1969, even flying the young airman at taxpayer expense to Washington for Republican-style (i.e., chaperoned) wooing.

The image of George H.W. Bush as a selfless, loyalist patsy for Nixon to kick around is reinforced by the number of positions Bush briefly held and added to his resume in the Nixon-Ford years. But there is plenty of contrary evidence of Bush Sr.'s lust for power and willingness to use his position and connections to advance his own career. Many Republicans at the time believed that a letter RNC Chairman Bush sent to the White House on August 7, 1974, in which he urged Nixon to resign, sealed Nixon's fate. (Nixon did, in fact, resign the very day after Bush?s letter arrived.) Almost immediately after Gerald Ford was sworn in, Bush launched an aggressive behind the scenes campaign in Congress and among elite Republicans nationally to have himself named vice president. He almost succeeded, but questions about the legality of Nixon's favoring Bush's 1970 Texas senatorial campaign at the expense of other campaigns with anonymous donations routed through Mexico undid his bid. (The Townhouse scandal, as this chicanery was called, brought on the last craze for campaign finance reform in the early 1970s.) In fine, Bush smelled too much like Nixon for the job.

As Bush Sr. was desperately climbing his way toward the inner reaches of political power, Bush Jr. was having a hell of a time in the Texas Air National Guard. The public record is silent on the circumstances that led Bush Jr. to stop flying in May of 1972, to suddenly take on mentoring inner city youths for a brief time that same year, to suddenly leave Texas to work for an Alabama political campaign and then for Harvard Business School. It is absolutely mute on why he failed to take a medical exam that would have enabled him to continue flying for the two years he had remaining in his contract with the Guard.

This silence is made more deafening by the presence of James R. Bath on the rescued document Martin Heldt acquired through the FOIA.

A few years older than Bush Jr., Bath is referred to off-handedly in the few news accounts there are about him as a Houston "entrepreneur" who specializes in aviation services and in making real estate purchases in the US (especially in Texas) for wealthy Saudis. He is also sometimes referred to as George W.'s James Baker--a fixer and right hand man. It's very peculiar, to say the least, that such an indispensable person to George W. Bush for most of his adult life has dropped almost entirely out of sight.

If you do a Google search on Bath, you will find a vaporous image of a characterless man--quotes from him are rare and descriptions rarer--with his hands in a lot of pies. He seems to have become a CIA agent in 1976, when George H.W. Bush was Director of Central Intelligence. Not long after, he was making business connections in Saudi Arabia?at the instigation of DCI Bush, according to former Houston Chronicle reporter Peter Brewton. In 1978, when Bush Jr. made his unsuccessful run for Congress, Bath invested $50,000 to procure a 5% interest in Bush's fledgling Arbusto Oil for a Saudi businessman and member of a prominent Saudi family, Salem bin Laden. Salem, who was killed in a freak ultralight aircraft accident in Texas in 1988, was the older step-brother of none other than at-large terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden. Salem's death conveniently gave Bath and another obscenely wealthy and well-connected Saudi, Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz, the opportunity to take over Salem's shares in an airport and a parking garage in Houston.

Bath became closely associated with bin Mahfouz in 1976, when he allegedly used Mahfouz's money to set up a CIA-front/airline called Skyway Aviation in Houston. Skyway was eventually investigated by the Drug Enforcement Agency for flying CIA money to the Cayman Islands, a Carribbean paradise where corporations with government contracts, like Dick Cheney's Halliburton, go to stash profits and federal handouts, tax-free, and skirt laws against trading with the enemy. The DEA wanted to know if Skyway was transporting something more germane to their jurisdiction, but nothing incriminating on that score was uncovered.

When bin Mahfouz became a principal in the Pakistan-based Bank of Commerce and Credit International, better known as BCCI, Bath moved with him, serving as a liaison between the Saudi sheikh and American financial interests. The virtually assetless bank came under Congressional scrutiny in the early 1990s when its Byzantine structure was found to have hidden within it a filter for drug and gun-running money, including the funds the Reagan administration was managing in its secret privatization of foreign policy that became known as Iran-Contra. BCCI also moved funds from private investors to what were then known as "Afghan freedom fighters," but which have since become known as terrorists.

Bath, bin Mahfouz, and a few other Saudi financiers reportedly paid millions to keep Bush Jr.'s oil enterprises alive in the late 1980s. Did they do this because they believed in Bush's business acumen or because they believed in Bush's access to his father, the vice-president-cum-president of the United States? Many of these Saudis have ties to the financial network that supports al Qaeda. Interestingly, in the wake of the September 11 attacks, in September and December 2001, Bush issued two executive orders to go after al Qaeda funding; but although both of those orders name names and foreign banks as targets, neither Khalid bin Mahfouz nor his financial interests are on the list. In fact, no Saudi bank is named on either list. This is a remarkable omission, considering that the overwhelming majority of highjackers were Saudi nationals. (See the investigative reporting of Tom Flocco at http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Mahfouz.html for more details on Bush?s failure to finger bin Mahfouz, and the possibility that the Bath connection is the reason for Bush?s reluctance. Flocco, incidentally, is no lefty bent on revenge for impeachment and the stolen election; he's an investigative reporter for Larry Klayman's Scaife-funded legal organization Judicial Watch.)

What seems evident from this history is that both George Bushes who have held power at the highest level of the American government have exhibited a pattern of contempt for democracy, contempt for the law, a willingness to sell access to the highest bidder, to pay any price for their own self-interest.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check out this link about Bush being grounded.
Check out the contents on this link about Bush being grounded.

http://democrats.com/display.cfm?id=154
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. That link was one of the ones that got me interested in the story
almost four years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent. We keep forgetting this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! Interesting.
Why not finish it without drawing conclusions-it could end where bin ladin's family was flown out of the US after 9-11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good idea.
I may get back to it. The story disturbs me. What disturbs me more than anything is that the AWOL bit is a red herring, covering up this more suspicious hole in the Bush boy's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKHRANA Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow! Very good stuff. Here's my take...
Shocking as the info on the flight suspension might be, it won't take hold of public attention because GWB has already established his bonafides with the pro-military public (big majority). Plus, if the info's already been out, it's old news, and the media is under significant intelligence control anyway and publishing this will find few interested parties if any (it will seem strangely so to many). GWB also has many more plausible denials than Clinton had, and, you can bet that the trail for more evidence has been covered...

However, I see more value in this information from another perspective, in the way it links GWB to Bush Sr., and back again to GWB.

I think Watergate was really about covering up information on the JFK assassination, and Nixon may have appointed Ford (Warren Commission) as VP and then Bush Sr (former CIA and Bay of Pigs player and who knows what else in 63) to head the CIA, to keep the cover on Watergate and clean up the institutional records and memory of those events of the previous decade...that would shock the daylights out of the public and ruin many otherwise honorable reputations... Then in 76 Carter was elected, and maybe the job was not finished. In the Reagan years, Bush Sr. using intelligence, engaged in new abuses, and created new records...

Where does GWB come in? It's just a suspicion I have, but what caught my attention when he became president is that every so often, he would announce some effort to particularly strengthen protections of confidentiality of previous and future administrations (to obtain FOI documents, etc), on "principle." Q: Was he put in to continue that old effort? Was he in other words planted by a sinister powerful group to protect them? After 9/11 in some interview I remember GWB was explaining the sequence of events and said that one of the first things was to "look for Tenet was his name I said" something like that, as if he didn't know Tenet that well then but had been told he was the man, and ever since then, Tenet and him have been very tight, even though Tenet was a Clinton appointee and Tenet was under a lot of criticism by most Republicans who wanted his head and still do (like Sen Shelby).

What does that mean? I don't know but it felt like this confirmed a connection to Bush Sr., so that if so Bush Sr who appears to have been very corrupt is still exercising control over the office, and if so, then GWB is really kind of like Al Pacino in the Godfather but more subservient than he lets on. Then look at the Skulls and Bones and new world order connection (and Kerry was one too).

What do BCCI in the 80's and the Military Industrial Complex in the 60's and Haliburtons in the 90's have in common? War, intelligence, making lots of money, and Bush Sr (and the current president if he is linked to his dad in more than a father-son relationship).

That would be the biggest story, but if it was true, publishing it would be very difficult and probably very hazardous to one's health.

Maybe the only successful publishing of it would be anonymously through the internet (and send me copies).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm agnostic on the JFK assassination conspiracy.
I don't know enough about it. But the point I was trying to make with this article is that the suspension could be a key to more recent shenanigans in this way: I suspect that Bush and Bath were suspended for not only possessing and using but selling cocaine. I think Bath was interesting to Bush Sr. for his entrepreneurial streak. BCCI was Pablo Escobar's bank, as well as bin Laden's. And Oliver North's. See all those dots? They just need some connecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKHRANA Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. connecting the dots...
Sounds like there's no way GW Bush could have been selling cocaine. What for, the money? He had money and the risk of selling cocaine at that time was like suicide. If the AirForce knew of any selling activity by an officer, good God they would do a lot more than suspend, more like court-martial and life in prison with hard labor, serious. Suspension is for a relatively minor offence like missing a required medical exam. No, sounds like he could have had cocaine in his body that's why he failed to take a drug test and was suspended for that.

I was familiar with those banking dots you mention but I think any true understanding of GWB cannot leave out Bush Sr, and any understanding of Bush Sr. cannot leave out the link to Nixon, and a link to Nixon can't leave out the things that made Nixon, well, what he was. And many shady people close to Nixon were close to Bush Sr. too.

There's got to be more to it than GWB cocaine use 30 years ago, which is kind of already accepted by the people.

If these cocaine stories are true and connected to the suspension, then the real story is how (by whose power) were the records covered up. Sounds like Bush Sr. and intelligence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Why might he have been selling cocaine?
Because he could get it, that's why. Because he and Bath could get it. And you're right about the real story: how and by whose power were these suspensions and busts covered up.

Question for Bath watchers: did Bath do time in the early 1970s, and if so what for? If not, did he do "community service" like his pal George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKHRANA Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. if you allege Bush sold cocaine, just have evidence to back it up...
I personally cannot believe he would incur that type of huge risk (much bigger in the early 70's) for no reason, and he had no need for money.

You did not answer my input on the fact that his military suspension could not possibly have been for "selling" because that offense was just way too serious for a simple "suspension".

Whoever would issue only a suspension for selling cocaine in the military (Air Guard is a branch of it, under the same laws), himself would see his career destroyed by such an error.

Again, I don't know what you know, but if you only present this on a hunch and on no evidence, then the whole value of all your work will be discredited and that would be a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. It's a suspicion I have
that Bath and Bush were suppliers/users. The suspicion is based on Bath's later career in the CIA and BCCI. You're forgetting one extremely important thing to remember about George W. Bush: his father was very close with Richard Nixon. I'll say that again: his father was very close with Richard Nixon. Some people do not have to live by the rules. They are the rules. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKHRANA Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. and what about Cheney...
I also alluded to Nixon appointing Ford as president, and that Ford might have been there to cover Nixon's involvement/knowledge of the JFK assassination, and Bush Sr. may have had a similar role at CIA.

Well, Ford appointed Cheney as chief of staff. and now this trusted man also involved in Haliburton is together with Bush Sr.'s son, as new wars with billions at stake for large corporations come about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Congratulations BurtWorm, keep on it!!
This is one the very best , most concise and easy to understand
articles that moof has ever read & moof has been reading them since they killed Bobby in 68.

This is very impressive and Please continue & finish this fantastic "timeline"

Sorry to gush but it really is an easy read and that is what is needed if people are going to become informed about what has taken place in America since Nixon first let the gangsters into town.

OKHRANA your points all seem very good too. another bit about Ford
he was in the cell with ruby & Warren when Ruby supposedly told them he could talk if they could take him to Washington with them right then. The story was that they told Ruby that this was not within their power and they left. If they indeed told Ruby this they were lying because they were empowered to do as ruby had pleaded.

About the bush crew & drugs here is a very recent thread about Bush brothers and Poppy being nabbed with drugs by an FBI agent in a Florida hotel room.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1047690

Here is a passage from a post in that thread added by Minstrel Boy
from "Defrauding America":

"Darlene Novinger said to me that she discovered during an FBI investigation that
George Bush and two of his sons were using drugs and prostitutes in a Florida
hotel while Bush was vice president. She said that when she reported these
findings to her FBI supervisors they warned her not to reveal what she had
discovered. Novinger had been requested to infiltrate drug trafficking operations
in South America and the United States. She was pressured to quit her FBI
position; her husband was beaten to death; and four hours after she appeared
on a July 1993 talkshow describing her findings (after she was warned not to
appear), her father mysteriously died. A dead white canary was left on his grave
as a warning to her. After receiving death threats she went into hiding, from
where she occasionally appeared as guest on talk shows, and called me from
undisclosed locations." - page 469

Keep at it BurtWorm soon you & Paul Thompson will have the whole story and then the challenge will be to condense the entire saga into an article small enough to make the high points without losing the crowd to boredom and apathy.

Don't confuse the moof enthuasism with the people that on a regular basis say " wow !! this is big, now they've had it "
On the contary it is a big difficult job with lots of research left to do but what is exciting about this article is the way you have said so much in such a clear way in so few words. Don't read the GD much so a PM would be greatly appreciated when you have an update or more written on this topic.

Congratulations BurtWorm, keep on it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thank you very much for your kind words!
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. edit..
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 12:06 AM by PaDUer
deleted there..oopppsssss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think Kevin Phillips is connecting a lot of dots in this book:
American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush
by Kevin Phillips

I've just started reading it. He's a long-time old-school republican and he's disgusted with what's happening to our democracy under the Bushes. His position is that we now have a dynasty in power which is a result of the military-industrial complex. I haven't got far into the book yet, but his whole tone is one of disgust with the whole clan, starting with the grandfathers, Prescott Bush and George Walker.

This is from the Amaxon review:

Kevin Phillips writes, "a ruler can ignore the mob and devote himself to the interests of the ruling class, gulling the inert majority who constitute the ruled." He then says, "Borgia references aside, 21st-century American readers of The Prince may feel that they have stumbled on a thinly disguised Bush White House political memo." These pointed words would sting regardless of who uttered them, but coming from Phillips, a former Republican strategist, they have an added piquancy. In American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, Phillips traces the rise of the Bush family from investment banking elites to political power brokers, using their Ivy League network, vast wealth, and questionable political maneuvering to obtain the White House and consequently, shake the foundation of constitutional American democracy. Citing the Bush family mainstays of finance, energy (oil), the military industrial complex, and national security and intelligence (the CIA), Phillips uses copious examples to show the dangerous alliance between the Bushes' business interests (huge corporations such as Enron and Haliburton) and the formation of national policy. No other family, Phillips says, that has fulfilled its presidential aspirations has been so involved in the ascendancy of the arms industry and of the 21st-century American imperium--often at the expense of regional and world peace and for their personal gain.

It is hard to tell what offends Phillips the most: the Bushes' systematic deceit and secrecy, their shady business dealings, their cronyism, or their family philosophy that privileges the very wealthy and utterly dismisses all the rest. It is clearly all of these things combined. But at the top of Phillips' list is the dynastic nature of their family power, for it is that concentration of power and influence that strikes at the heart of our democracy. Past administrations have transgressed, albeit not so egregiously, and other political families have had dynastic ambitions. But none have succeeded as thoroughly as the Bushes. Jefferson and Madison would be horrified, and according to Phillips, we should be too. --Silvana Tropea

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That book is on my to-buy list!
Can't wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, hey, give the guy * a break
he was drunk and on drugs for God's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deserves more page 1 time N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaybird Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. a kick... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. It's also important to make the point that W NEVER had his flight status
restored. Also, his AFSC (AIr Force Speciality Code (or classification)) was never changed from that of pilot-- so what the hell was he doing for the rest of the time in the Guard (at least for the very small number of days that he actually may have shown up)

There are also rumors that he crashed a jet. In fact, I think he even taunted a reporter about it, saying something like "So, where's the jet?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. UCMJ Article 85 Bush should be in prison.
Being AWOL for more than 30 days is considered desertion. I think Bush could be charged on several counts.

http://www.military-network.com/main_ucmj/SUBCHAPTERX.html#885.85

5. ART. 85. DESERTION

 (a) Any member of the armed forces who--

(1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently;

(2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or

(3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another on of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States; is guilty of desertion.

 (b) Any commissioned officer of the armed forces who, after tender of his resignation and before notice of its acceptance, quits his post or proper duties without leave and with intent to remain away therefrom permanently is guilty of desertion.

 (c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC