Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge: Young Voters Said To Be Trending Toward Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:52 AM
Original message
Drudge: Young Voters Said To Be Trending Toward Bush
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 11:38 AM by rmpalmer
I'm posting Drudge cause this is a Roll Call article from Kondrake for which you need a subscription. Would someone mention the word Draft to these idiot kids. Or give them enlistment forms!

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash4.htm

"Here's a harrowing pair of facts for Democrats: In 60 years, no Democrat has ever won the presidency without carrying the youth vote. And right now President Bush's approval rating among 18- to 29-year-olds is 62 percent, higher than his nationwide rating. Top Republican strategists admit that the youth vote is fluid, but right now the trends are all in their direction, which they hope is a harbinger not only for 2004, but also a possible longer-term party realignment."

A Bush campaign official said, "It's called the theory of political socialization. Who are the most Democratic people in America? It's the over-65 age group. Why? Because the two presidents they knew best were Franklin Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover. And who are the most Republican? People in their 40s, who came of age in the last two years of Jimmy Carter and the first two years of Ronald Reagan. If your politics were being formed during the last two years of Bill Clinton and the first two years of George Bush, there's a fairly good chance that we'll have your support."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I bet they change their minds
about Bush if he is re-selected and he reinstates the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Okay, that would be too late, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Problem with that. All the draft enabling legislation has
been introduced by Democrats. There are NO republican signatures on those bills. So if we start yelling, "Draft" at them, the Reps just say, "Hey, It's the Dems that are trying to bring it back. Not us. Look at the names on the legislation." Given that HUGE fact, who will be believed on the draft question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. they'll change their minds
when they need to look for a job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kondrake is a GOP whore -who knows approval isn't "re-elect"
The Dems always win the youth VOTE - and will do that again -

and the "youths" "approval of Bush" will not change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Good point about re-elect and approval
BTW, I'll bet that 62 percent was from a single poll done before those sliding numbers for Bush came out this week. Plus, this sentence is crap: "If your politics were being formed during the last two years of Bill Clinton and the first two years of George Bush, there's a fairly good chance that we'll have your support." Clinton left office with an approval rating in the mid-60s, much higher than Bush's is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. He almost sounds like he has convinced himself
Come on Drudge keep telling yourself..........you may just believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afraid_of_the_dark Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Exactly... you also have to consider the source
on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afraid_of_the_dark Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. This makes sense...
Given that he's the incumbent. But you'd think that the older end of that age group (i.e., the ones who graduated from college in the worst job market in recent memory and are desperately searching for work) would be less likely to vote for Bush. That's one of the reasons he doesn't have my vote (I of that aforementioned age range).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Uh, maybe people over 80 years old remember Hoover
since he was President 1929-1933, and most people under 10 don't really care who the president was.

I have just two words for the 18-29 age group.

Jobs, Draft.

You won't have the first, you will have the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Smoke and mirrors.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 11:59 AM by Mary Pat
Polling the youth vote is very difficult and the results are easily manipulated. And, for the most part, the above-cited past elections cannot be reasonably compared to the situation in which we find ourselves now. Notice how these observations don't include voter sentiment at the close of the Nixon era? And what if your wake-up call to politics happened when Bush sent your friends and siblings to fight a war against non-existent WMDs.

I will agree, though, that the Hoover to FDR transition is instructive. Hoover was the last presidential champion of the robber barons, and FDR was swept into office on a tide of righteous resentment aginst the so-called ruling class.

Edit: grammar and spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree totally with your last sentence
and I, too, wonder about the source of that poll with the 62 percent approval rating and whether a re-elect question was asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. If we are to learn anything from Iowa
it is that the polls are bullshit. Even if you try to conduct a fair cold call poll, you can stop it when it makes your argument.
Polls are a tool to apply conformity to sheep.
We really need to banish pollsters from the process and make the issues the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Now they're pitting the young vs. the old voter
Didn't the Republican party court the senior citizens in the last election and they did so by claiming that the Democrats use the social security lockbox as a scare tactic? And didn't Chris Matthews agree with the Republicans? So now that the Republican party screwed over the seniors, they're courting the young voters so that they can win the next election and do what if they win? Approve a draft?

Question: How long before the mainstream figures out the patterns here? Republicans are only interested in getting elected. They don't have any loyalty to any group. One day they will cut the balls of their Christian Right-wing base if it suits them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir_Shrek Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Flame-proof underwear locked...
Young voters are unreliable.

They switch party affiliations, sometimes for the right reasons, sometimes for the wrong ones. One week, they're all about (candidate's name here), the next week they've completely lost interest. They can be easily swayed at times. They usually don't have the money to contribute to a campaign.

I'm not trying to make a broad generalization, but in my experience these are things you have to be aware of if you're banking on the youth vote. I saw a lot of this in college, and I still see a lot of it now (I'm 25). I went through some of it myself. In fact, I've voted in two Presidential elections, and this is the first time I even paid a modicum of attention to the nomination race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Utter poppycock. This is a total rove plant piece of propaganda and BS
being used to bolster the false allegations BY ROVE that 'dems are leaving the party in droves."

PROVE it I say. This is utter nonsense and patently untrue without one iota of fact or relevence to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Aparently, Bush is getting the 'closet case' vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sure, and monkeys are flying outta my ass
if he's refering to the kids he reads to then maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sannum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. ...
Of course....No free thought is allowed in schools anymore. They are being brainwashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not My Kids!
My two sons are firmly in the progressive camp, even though they think I'm more than a little nuts for getting so worked up about things.

Ya just have to raise 'em properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I think that if this were a huge trend more than 8 people would have shown
up to "storm" the Dean rally. Think about it. Freeper
events are always poorly attended but get coverage.
They look for that one person to interview to make
a blanket statement. This story is a real load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC