Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reason 7651387634387 to hate walmart -- Walmart settles COLI suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:02 PM
Original message
Reason 7651387634387 to hate walmart -- Walmart settles COLI suit


http://www.businessinsurance.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?newsId=3331


HOUSTON—Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has settled a lawsuit that charged the employer’s corporate-owned life insurance policies violated Texas law.

In the 1990s, Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart purchased life insurance policies on its employees and made itself the beneficiary to obtain certain tax benefits, a suit by the families of deceased Wal-Mart workers charged. The suit alleged Wal-Mart’s COLI policies violated a Texas law that requires a company to have an “insurable interest” in the lives of employees.

...snip....


Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.


In the article it mentions that the COLI policies no longer have any tax benefit. so why keep doing it. shear greed. walmart needs the extra $60,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
afraid_of_the_dark Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's just a way to recoup
those pesky salaries that they had to pay while the employee was alive. Otherwise, those really start eating away at the profit margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. aka "dead peasants' insurance"
shit, I wouldn't be surprised if managers started claiming rights of prima nocta when their employees marry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are called dead Peasant policies or something...


I remember reading about it a long time ago...

Absolutely disgusting..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for posting this, veganwitch
the workers are worth more dead than alive

more info at-
Profiting from death? Lawsuit filed in Wal-Mart life insurance case

http://www.walmartwatch.com/info/internal.cfm
subsection_id=131&internal_id=350
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. it's the tip of the iceberg!
Peasant insurance' a Corporate Shame

The Atlanta Journal and Constitution (January 30, 2003) p. 13A
At least once a week I buy my lunch from Au Bon Pain. It never occurred to me that its employees are subject to what I consider a screaming unethical conduct.

In the year that just ended, the company that owns these food outlets, Panera, made $3 million by pocketing the death benefits after several of its employees died --- without giving their families a red penny.

And Panera is hardly the only American corporation that fattens its bottom line in this ghoulish manner. Take CM Holdings Inc. When one of its employees, Felipe M. Tillman, died, the company received life insurance benefits amounting to $339,302; his family received a big, fat nothing.

The Wall Street Journal, which reported Tillman's fate, found that numerous corporations purchase corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies on millions of employees, typically without their knowledge.
Among the corporations that have bought such insurance, nicknamed "janitors' " or "dead peasants' " insurance, are AT&T, Dow Chemical, Nestle USA, Procter & Gamble, Walt Disney and Wal-Mart.
Corporations gain not merely from the tax-free life insurance benefits they receive when current or former employees die but also can borrow money against these policies. Many companies even deducted the interest on these loans from their taxes.

In 1996 Congress moved to limit such deductions, and the IRS has sued some 80 corporations, including Winn-Dixie and American Electric Power, to collect back taxes on such loans.
Still, companies benefit. They are not taxed on gains within a life insurance policy; in effect, these policies amount to tax-free investments for businesses.

Critics have compared these life insurance policies to those purchased by some American slaveholders on the lives of their slaves, who also were unaware of such policies held by their owners.
The business of selling COLI policies is thriving, with premiums growing from $1.5 billion in 2000 to $2.8 billion in 2001. Insurance executives maintain that such policies are "perfectly legal."
Facing congressional curbs, the insurance lobby has placed ads in Capitol Hill newspapers extolling the importance of COLI, calling it "business life insurance" on the grounds that such coverage is essential for the well-being of the corporations involved.

Herb Perone of the American Council of Life Insurers told the San Francisco Chronicle: "Nobody gets upset when a company insures its plant or its fleet of cars or land or any other business asset. To think that your labor force is not a business asset is extremely shortsighted."
Mark Elam, the acting president of the American Council of Life Insurers, wrote to The Wall Street Journal that corporations use the benefits they gain from the employee's death to help finance health care for retirees. He cited no evidence to this effect.
In fact, in the case of Felipe Tillman, as well as many others, The Wall Street Journal reports that death benefits were used to fatten executive compensation.

In response, U.S. Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas) introduced a bill that merely called for notifying employees when companies purchase COLI policies on them, and not for changing this obnoxious practice. But he was not even able to get a hearing on his bill in the House.

Whether you call it dead peasants' insurance or use the less stigmatizing term COLI, the ghoulish practice would make a fine case study for the budding ethics programs that are being rushed into the curriculum of business schools since Enron.

Even Scrooge would have second thoughts about fattening corporate coffers and executives' benefits while widows and orphans are left to fend without a dime, even for funeral costs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC