Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When will the CIA put Richard Perle down?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:00 PM
Original message
When will the CIA put Richard Perle down?
For all the ill feelings that Richard Perle elicits among many of us here, what is truly remarkable that he lays the blame for the entire spectrum of US foreign policy failure at he feet of the CIA.

While I am no great fan of the CIA, I think I know enough to realize that Perle's assessment on this issue is, as was his assessment of post-war Iraq, complete horseshit.

Anyone want to guess when the CIA shuts this bastard up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will be interesting to watch.......
The CIA should have done it long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfish Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's very odd
that this admin. seems to have no fear of the intelligence community. From making the CIA director the scapegoat on the Niger matter to the Plame affair to Perle trashing them they seem totally unconcerned that they are making some powerful enemies. I don't remember any other administration doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well that's the wierd thing
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 02:10 PM by burythehatchet
especially in view of Poppy's ownership of the CIA. Remember it was he who took over the "shadow" CIA when Jimmy Carter decided to downsize the scale of intelligence ops and let a bunch of the spooks go.

I dunno, maybe this is a coordinated attack against the "establishment" CIA, in favor of the shadow intel agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfish Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes
I was thinking about that recently. Didn't the CIA name a building or honor Poppy in some way during recent years? Dubya doesn't seem at all influenced by his Dad, it's almost as if he's acting out some form of rebellion and going against his policies. That or he's so totally captured by Cheney and his minions that he is oblivious.

Anyway, I am curious if there will be some CIA payback for Perle and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the main headquarters are named after him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. analysis vs. operations - here's the bad news folks
The CIA is staffed to the gills with well educated, ultra-bright, cosmopolitan, mostly decent human beings - on the "analysis" side. They take raw data, try to find some sense in it, come up with ideas, plans and contingencies.

The operations side does stuff - that's the side Bush "controls" or at least has some influence in.

Bush is not afraid of the experts in the analysis side of the CIA, and the ops people ARE his side. That's why he's not afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Interesting point
makes alot of sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm going to lock this.
The moderators have discussed this thread and come to the consensus that it could possibly be construed to advocate harm to an administration official. Since the Secret Service is not known for its sense of humor, we feel that it is better to err on the side of caution and lock this thread.

Thanks,
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC