Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone considered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:30 AM
Original message
Has anyone considered
there's one thing GW has that his father did not...PNAC. It was formed in spring 1997 (according to their website). Is it possible that they are so imbedded and not just behind the scenes (so to speak), but actually ARE the ones in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. consider it daily
IMHO, his father assumed he would have term II to finish. he sobered up his son, and planned for the future. they got crackin' early this time around. son also has serious seeds planted in florida (and diebold) that his father didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. But did Bush find PNAC or
did PNAC find Bush? I'm seriously thinking it's the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyLove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. They've been around since the days of Reagan......
(the main players that is), but no-one has been crazy enough to actually listen to them let alone allow them to formulate our foreign policy until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Under Reagan they weren't a group though
While under Reagan they gained opportunities for key contacts and seeds of power and influence. They only announced themselves as a formal group of ideologically bound people in 1997.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyLove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed.............
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 03:28 AM by BigDaddyLove
though I bet they now wish they would have kept their mouths shut, not come together as a visible group but rather stayed out of sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC