Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Convention Bounce Worst Ever for Incumbent President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 01:06 PM
Original message
Bush's Convention Bounce Worst Ever for Incumbent President
The new Gallup poll, conducted entirely after the GOP convention and therefore the first poll that truly measures Bush's bounce, shows Bush with a very small bounce indeed: 2 points, whether you look at registered voters (RVs) or likely voters (LVs). His support among RVs has risen from 47 percent before to 49 percent after the convention, so that he now leads Kerry by a single point (49-48) rather than trailing by a point.

Note also that Bush's 2-point bounce from his convention (which is defined as the change in a candidate's level of support, not in margin) is the worst ever received by an incumbent president, regardless of party, and the worst ever received by a Republican candidate, whether incumbent or not (see this Gallup analysis for all the relevant historical data). In 2000, Bush received an 8-point bounce. And even his hapless father received a 5-point bounce in 1992.

The poll contains other results that suggest the relative ineffectiveness of the GOP convention.

Bush's acceptance speech, which the media fawned over so ostentatiously, was not rated any better by the public than was Kerry's—in fact, it received slightly worse ratings. Kerry's acceptance speech was rated excellent by 25 percent and good by 27 percent; Bush's was rated excellent by 22 percent and good by 27 percent.

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=183679
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard on our local news/radio channel this morning
that Reagan received no bounce. Is this true????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poliguru Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That wouldn't necessarily surprise me
Reagan had such commanding leads that he didn't really need a bounce - polls before the convention showed huge amounts of support. But I'm just speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You only need a bounce if you are behind
I wonder what Clinton's bounce in 96 was. . .did he have a bounce.

Then the viewpoint is, if Chimpy can't get a bounce when he is so low on the polls, how is he gonna win it? Reagan and Clinton had it wrapped up.

How did Chimpy's dad do in the bounce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not for long so stop gloating
your chimp boy is toast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC