Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Questions that Alastair Campbell must answer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 02:46 AM
Original message
Questions that Alastair Campbell must answer
Since Campbell is in the Hutton dock today I will post this. I don't think that Campbell in the dock will be a pretty sight though. Make of this what you will.

http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/opinion.cfm?id=910322003

Most ominously, yesterday seemed to reveal a smoking gun regarding the genesis of this whole crisis: a series of e-mails between Campbell and Powell which suggests the September dossier was indeed doctored to some extent. On 5 September last year, Campbell e-mailed Powell that a "substantial re-write" was required of the draft dossier on the Iraqi threat, to include "real intelligence material". But on 17 September, Powell had to reply that the dossier still "does nothing to demonstrate a threat, let alone an imminent threat". Powell argues with Campbell: "We need to make clear in launching the document that we do not claim that we have evidence that he is an imminent threat."

Yet a week later, when the dossier was published, it contained a forward from Tony Blair saying Saddam was "a serious and current" threat. Of course, one can argue that "current" does not mean "imminent". But only if you are a master of spin like Alastair Campbell. Which requires Mr Campbell to answer a number of basic questions when he is interviewed today at the inquiry: (1) What did he mean by "substantial re-write"? (2) What role did he play in this re-write? (3) If the late drafts of the dossier still showed no imminent Iraqi threat, what was the provenance of the claim in the published document that Iraq had the potential to launch WMD in only 45 minutes? (4) In this context, what was "serious and current" meant to imply? (5) And finally, the ultimate question - what did Tony Blair know of these matters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Certainly looks like a plan to me.
I liked the line about a "cock up" instead of a conspiracy and the reference to reaching Powell while he was halfway up a rockface was amusing, too.

Keep these coming--I look forward to your posts every morning while this inquiry goes on.


Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In the meantime
Try this link. I really should post this link as a thread in GD.

http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC