Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repubs filibuster Judicial Nominee - Politico.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 06:31 PM
Original message
Repubs filibuster Judicial Nominee - Politico.com
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69872.html

Senate Republicans on Tuesday filibustered President Barack Obama’s nomination of Caitlin Halligan for the U.S. Court of Appeals, prompting Democrats to denounce the move as setting “a new standard” for confirming judicial nominees.

Republicans cited Halligan’s controversial stance on gun laws as a reason for their opposition.

“The new standard applied by Senate Republicans to nominations to the D.C. Circuit will make it nearly impossible for nominees of any president to be confirmed to this important court,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who before the vote made the case that Halligan had broad support and experience in both the public and private sector.

A former New York state solicitor general, Halligan “is the kind of nominee we should all welcome to public service,” Leahy added. “This filibuster is a disservice to the federal judiciary, and to the millions of Americans it serves.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69872.html#ixzz1fngEGpnv
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. How anybody with any sense of fairness could vote for a
republican for senate. i know a lot of people who have voted for Sen Grassley and don't seem to have a clue about what the GOP is up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the 'credit' for people not seeming "to have a clue about what the GOP is up to"
Edited on Tue Dec-06-11 07:28 PM by Bill USA
has to go in no small part to the Corporate owned/controlled M$M. Have you heard a M$M talking head mention the word 'filibuster' since Obama has been in the WH? I haven't.

The best article I have read on the Republican strategy of stopping (or delaying as long as possible) anything from being accomplished (while campaigning against Dems saying: "They can't make government work!"), is by Peter Beinart, in Time magazine:

Why Washington is Tied in Knots

In 2009, Senate Republicans filibustered a stunning 80% of major legislation, even more than during the Clinton years. GOP leader Mitch McConnell led a filibuster of a deficit-reduction commission that he himself had demanded. The Obama White House spent months trying to lure the Finance Committee's ranking Republican, Chuck Grassley, into supporting a deal on health care reform and gave his staff a major role in crafting the bill. But GOP officials back home began threatening to run a primary challenger against the Iowa Senator. By late summer, Grassley wasn't just inching away from reform; he was implying that Obamacare would euthanize Grandma.

By October, the process had dragged on for the better part of a year, and the public mood had grown bitter. According to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, the percentage of Americans who said Obama had done a "very good" job of "achieving his goals" was less than half the level of January 2009, and significantly fewer people believed he was successfully "changing business as usual in Washington."

The Republicans have used this rising disgust with government not just to cripple health care reform but also to derail other Obama initiatives. In a memo to clients on how to defeat new regulation of Wall Street, Republican pollster Frank Luntz urged them to attack "lobbyist loopholes" — items that were put into the financial-reform bill, as in the health care bill, largely to attract enough Democratic votes to break the GOP filibuster. Needing 60 votes has made the debate over every bill on Obama's agenda longer and uglier, which is exactly how the Republicans want it to be.

Last month, when the Kaiser Family Foundation surveyed Americans' views on health care reform, it found that most people still back the individual components of Obama's effort. But enthusiasm for the bill itself — the contents of which remain hazy in the public mind — has faded, just as in 1993. And according to a new poll by CNN/ORC, public approval of Congress stands at its lowest level since — you guessed it — the Gingrich era. Once again, the Republicans have told Americans that they can't trust government with their health care, and once again, their own actions have helped convince Americans that what they say is true. The circle is complete.
<more>


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1966451,00.html#ixzz1fntkYrff
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ++++
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I moved back to Iowa after living in New York for over 20 years. I
Edited on Tue Dec-06-11 08:51 PM by libinnyandia
subscribed to The New York Times and some liberal magazines. My local paper is right wing and its articles read as if they were written by GOP operatives. Until I reprogrammed my car radio it seemed like every station had Rush Limbaugh. So many places are like that and the citizens don't hear about the issues. Thank God for my two brothers, with whom I can talk about the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dballance Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. So Much for their contention nominees get an up or down vote
I guess that only applied to the nominees from Republican presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC