Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Scheer: California Refuses to Accept Obama’s Banking Sellout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:26 AM
Original message
Robert Scheer: California Refuses to Accept Obama’s Banking Sellout

from truthdig:



California Refuses to Accept Obama’s Banking Sellout

Posted on Nov 10, 2011
By Robert Scheer


There is no three-strikes law for crooked bankers, not even a law for a fifth strike, as The New York Times reported in the case of Citigroup, cited last month in a $1 billion fraud case. Unlike the California third-striker I once wrote about whom a district attorney wanted banished forever to state prison for stealing a piece of pizza from the plate of a person dining outdoors, Citigroup executives get off with a fine and by offering a promise not to do it again, and again and again.

As the Times reported when Citigroup agreed to settle SEC charges last month: “Citigroup’s main brokerage subsidiary, its predecessors or its parent company agreed to not violate the very same antifraud statue in July 2010. And in May 2006. Also as far back as March 2005 and April 2000.”

Not that the bankers face prison time, since the Justice Department has refused to act in these cases, and the Securities and Exchange Commission is bringing only civil charges, which the banks find quite tolerable. This time, the fine against Citigroup was $285 million, which may sound like a lot except that the bank raked off as much as $700 million on this particular toxic securities deal. As the Bloomberg news service editorialized, “... there should be only one answer from Jed S. Rakoff, the federal judge in New York assigned to weigh the merits of the agreement: You’ve got to be kidding.”

......(snip)......

The fix was in for what a New York Times editorial on Tuesday headlined “Letting the Banks Off Easy” described as “paltry” mortgage relief, reducing by less than $20 billion the balances of 14.5 million underwater homeowners who are “drowning in some $700 billion of negative equity.” The deal has been stalled by the refusal of California Attorney General Kamala Harris to accept this sellout. Among its other disastrous concessions would be ending further investigation by the states into financial skullduggery connected with the housing meltdown. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/california_refuses_to_accept_obamas_banking_sellout_20111110/



Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. More weak sauce, please
It appears after last night's clown show, the 2012 election will boil down to a choice between more weak sauce and the crazies. I think the crazies have frightened enough people that the one item on the menu for the foreseeable future will be weak sauce -- maybe some watered down weak sauce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. See you need to steal enough to afford good lawyers and campaign contributions if you
want to get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. good for California - let them go to court and get their asses kicked by better lawyers
and if the GOP wins in 2012 they will never collect a fucking dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. So your argument is they should accept corruption out of fear of
still greater corruption gaining control? That does not even make sense. State officials have a sworn duty, and that duty is not sworn to Barack Obama. CA is doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, I am not saying that. The state AG's may pursue 20-30 different prosecutions
in different states if they wish. They will mostly prove very little in actual damages.

I want to see the most money extracted from the banks - the $25 billion is the way to do that. Look at it this way - what have they gotten so far? Not very much. Why doesn't NY or CA run out in front of this? They are beholden to no agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good for Judge Kamala Harris.
She, at least, appears to have "balls".:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good for you, California
First New York, then Delaware, now California won't go along with the sellout offer from the bank-owned Federal government. Prosecute those bastards to the fullest extent of the law and hit them where it hurts the most: right in their wallets!

Treat crime in the suites like crime in the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC