Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ray McGovern: Did Tenet Hide Key 9/11 Info?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 06:24 PM
Original message
Ray McGovern: Did Tenet Hide Key 9/11 Info?

from Consortium News:



Did Tenet Hide Key 9/11 Info?
August 16, 2011

Exclusive: With few exceptions – like some salacious rumor about the Kennedy family – the mainstream U.S. news media has little interest in historical stories. Such was the case when an ex-White House terrorism official accused a former CIA director of withholding information that might have prevented a 9/11 attack, Ray McGovern reports.

By Ray McGovern


Bulletin for those of you who get your information only from the New York Times, the Washington Post and other outlets of the Fawning Corporate Media (FCM): Former White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke has accused ex-CIA Director George Tenet of denying him and others access to intelligence that could have thwarted the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11.

Deliberately withholding critical intelligence from those who need it, and can act on it, is — at the least — gross dereliction of duty.

The more so if keeping the White House promptly and fully informed is at the top of your job jar, as it was for Director of Central Intelligence Tenet. And yet that is precisely the charge Clarke has leveled at the former DCI.

In an interview aired on Aug. 11 on a local PBS affiliate in Colorado, Clarke charges that Tenet and two other senior CIA officials, Cofer Black and Richard Blee, deliberately withheld information about two of the hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77 — al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar. The two had entered the United States more than a year before the 9/11 attacks. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2011/08/16/did-tenet-hide-key-911-info/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. First, you have to believe that an airliner struck the Pentagon. Not a shred of
evidence to support that. There were dozens of surveillance and security cameras that were in positions to film the aircraft striking the Pentagon yet there is NOT ONE that shows even an aircraft on approach.

Not to say that Tenet didn't withhold info. I feel sure he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpwm17 Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's not like no other airlines struck any buildings on 9-11
Actually there were numerous witnesses to the American Airlines 757 colliding with the Pentagon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0&feature=related

There are photographs of the aircraft debris in and around the Pentagon which is easy to Google. Also the DNA from most of the passengers from flight 77 was found from the crash site.

There is one poor video of the American Airlines 757 from a security camera: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q&feature=channel_video_title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only crazy people and 1500 architects and engineers question the official story of 9/11 ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpwm17 Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's a crackpot site
For example, take the thermite nonsense they are pushing. The amount of thermite required to take down a building could not be hidden, if it is even possible to pull off at all. There would be numerous witnesses and it would require numerous conspirators to pull it off. Plus how did they manage to get the aircraft to hit the same floors that the alleged thermite was installed?

It's obvious that the buildings collapsed from the very same floors that the enormous aircraft entered is because the enormous aircraft and the ensuing large fires caused the buildings to collapse.

The Nixon administration couldn't even pull off a stupid burglary without getting caught. How could anyone pull off this massive conspiracy requiring thousands of people without getting caught. Basic common sense should tell anyone the this truther stuff is complete BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thermite can be painted on
And the WTC had shut downs a week before 9/11. Some employees said they heard loud noises in the floors above them or below them before 9/11. They took video of what appeared to be cement dust in their offices. The WTC was losing money. There were a lot of offices that were empty. The maintenance man who saved people on 9/11 and worked there for 20 years, said he heard and felt an explosion in the basement just a second before the plane hit 80 some stories above. He went to the basement and saw that there had been explosions in the basement. And how does the lobby look like a bomb went off, but floors above were intact. How come we heard tapes of firemen say there were pockets of fire, and they could put it out? Jet fuel loses it's heat in a building rather than a contained tank. And yes how come the Pentagon can't show us a video of a "plane" hitting the Pentagon? And had it been a passenger plane, wouldn't that have caused some cars to turn over just by the force of the plane that close to the highway? And how come the Pentagon didn't protect itself? Or even close the highway, because if this were a true terror attack, they wouldn't know what to expect next. They had 40 minutes since the second plane hit the towers. I could go on and on and on and on. Why hasn't anyone asked The Dick why he had the stand down order?

The 9/11 commission is as worthless as the Warren commission. I believe neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpwm17 Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's mostly a bunch of smoke created by the truther scammers
I addressed the Pentagon above.

The "explosions" they heard when the plain hit were elevators slamming into the basement. The elevator cables were severed by the aircraft. Plus a fire ball from the aircraft went through an elevator shaft and entering the lobby. The buildings didn't collapse from the basements so the bombs in the basement story makes no sense.

The WTC wasn't losing money and there was high occupancy.

There's no way that a fire created by a Boeing 767 inside a building could easily be put out. Even from the streets below one could see the intensity of the fires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ya those 1500 architects and engineers are idiots and so are these guys:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thermite can be painted on? Do you know what kind of bullshit you are spewing?
This is thermite vs car:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdCsbZf1_Ng

Look at how much thermite was used and how little damage was done to the thin aluminum hood of the car. Imagine how much more you would need to melt a steel beam, it would not only be impossible to paint on but you would need tons of it placed all around the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tenet told the 9/11 Commission that he was the one who
called off the hits on Obama before 9/11. That always made me suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ( I think you meant to type "Osama")
Although, it's not certain, with the bunch of criminals that were in power at the time, whether your statement can stand as written....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Osama, Obama, what's the difference?
The Teabagsters would have us believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R too late to recommend 'officially' eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC