Military gives marching orders to jihadis

[xchrom]

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/MH17Df01.html

Put what follows in the category of paragraphs no one noticed that should have made the nation's hair stand on end. This particular paragraph should also have sent chills through the body politic, launched warning flares, and left the people's representatives in congress shouting about something other than the debt crisis.

Last weekend, two reliable New York Times reporters, Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, had a piece in that paper's Sunday Review entitled "After 9/11, an Era of Tinker, Tailor, Jihadist, Spy". Its focus was the latest counter-terrorism thinking at the Pentagon: deterrence theory. (Evidently an amalgam of the old Cold War ideas of "containment" and nuclear deterrence wackily reimagined by the boys in the five-sided building for the age of the jihadi.) Schmitt and Shanker's article was, a note informed the


reader, based on research for their forthcoming book, Counterstrike: The Untold Story of America's Secret Campaign Against Al Qaeda.

And here's the paragraph, buried in the middle of their piece, that should have stopped readers in their tracks:

Or consider what American computer specialists are doing on the Internet, perhaps terrorist leaders' greatest safe haven, where they recruit, raise money, and plot future attacks on a global scale. American specialists have become especially proficient at forging the onscreen cyber-trademarks used by al-Qaeda to certify its web statements, and are posting confusing and contradictory orders, some so virulent that young Muslims dabbling in jihadist philosophy, but on the fence about it, might be driven away.

[leveymg]

1. Really? Who'd a thought? You mean like the websites run by these guys?

[saras]

2. I suspect the "disruption" is merely a cover for being able to effectively order false-flag actions

[bemildred]

3. It's almost like they would welcome some blowback.

Nah, that would be ridiculous.
:sarcasm: