http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/out-from-under-the-anti-tax-pledge/2011/07/20/gIQAoudbQI_story.htmlWITH A HANDFUL of exceptions, every Republican member of Congress has signed a pledge against increasing taxes. Would allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire as scheduled in 2012 violate this vow? We posed this question to Grover Norquist, its author and enforcer, and his answer was both surprising and encouraging: No.
In other words, according to Mr. Norquist’s interpretation of the Americans for Tax Reform pledge, lawmakers have the technical leeway to bring in as much as $4 trillion in new tax revenue — the cost of extending President George W. Bush’s tax cuts for another decade — without being accused of breaking their promise. “Not continuing a tax cut is not technically a tax increase,” Mr. Norquist told us. So it doesn’t violate the pledge? “We wouldn’t hold it that way,” he said.
(MORE)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, I've heard Norquist has since back-pedalled on this statment, but once it's outa the gate you can't totally recall it. I never thought I would hear one of the leading fanatic ideologues of the GOP utter such a sensible, logical statement! My, oh my! Will wonders never cease!
You see Mr. President, it IS possible to educe some flexibility from the Corporate Lobbyist Party if you stand firm for a position (which, you have been doing regarding some
modest revenue increases as part of the deficit deal (to my great relief) although it's not
nearly enough revenue increases relative to cuts as it should be!...but I guess we'll have to learn to be
grateful for a small favor or two).