Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can We Cut "Defense" Spending?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:47 PM
Original message
Can We Cut "Defense" Spending?
Andrew Ferguson of the Weekly Standard summed up the neoconservative case against cutting U.S. defense spending in a February 21 article entitled “The Stockman Temptation.” In Ferguson’s article, he recollected that President Reagan’s Budget Director David Stockman had told Reagan back in the early 1980s that he must cut the defense budget in order to balance the budget. “Defense is not a budget issue,” Reagan responded. “You spend what you need.”

<snip>

Needed Spending?

The essential part of Reagan’s statement was the word “need.”


http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/foreign-policy/6604-can-we-cut-qdefenseq-spending

The article also discusses the recommendations of the Paul-Frank commission for defense cuts in unnecessary spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing our armed services currently do has anything to do with defense
Can we cut killing-the-world-to-prove-we-can-do-it spending?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. +10^10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reagan's astrologers and psychics kept him paranoid...
He wasted a ton of money on useless "technology" ... note the irony quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanDutchy Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:12 PM
Original message
Of course you can: as soon as possible
Arms calls for Arms, Peace calls for Peace.

There is so much to invest in the prosperity in your country.


And the one's who put their feet between that goal, in contact we will change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanDutchy Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course you can: as soon as possible
Arms calls for Arms, Peace calls for Peace.

There is so much to invest in the prosperity in your country.


And the one's who put their feet between that goal, in contact we will change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. It seems like we have to if we actually plan on getting the debt under control
no two ways about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't know. Have something to do with where boom-boom made. Mongo only pawn in game of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. If we could decimate the defense budget, and bring it down
to something resembling reality, we could save the entire rest of this country and restore it to real liberal values.

Head start, quality education, and subsidized higher Education
Health care
A public safety net
Repairing infrastructure
Job training
Affordable housing

It would all be within reach again. But right now, none of it is achievable because out government has decided that weapons and defense contractors are more important. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's an offense budget
Not a defense budget and like everything else, it just channels our money to General Dynamics, Rand Corp, Halliburton, etc.

If we just cut the waste, we would be ahead of the game. Look at the Osprey. No branch wanted it due to it's propensity of crashing with out warning and killing people. Look at the SR21 Blackbird. Here's a plane that costs a states annual budget per copy that we don't need.

Once a country hits the point that it can destroy the world 5,000 times, it has enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC