History's shifting sands (Al Jazeera)

[IDemo]

The revolutions sweeping the Arab world indicate a tectonic shift in the global balance of people power.

Mark LeVine Last Modified: 26 Feb 2011 12:58 GMT

For decades, even centuries, the peoples of the Arab world have been told by Europeans and, later, Americans that their societies were stagnant and backward. According to Lord Cromer, author of the 1908 pseudo-history Modern Egypt, their progress was "arrested" by the very fact of their being Muslim, by virtue of which their minds were as "strange" to that of a modern Western man "as would be the mind of an inhabitant of Saturn".

The only hope of reshaping their minds towards a more earthly disposition was to accept Western tutelage, supervision, and even rule "until such time as they re able to stand alone," in the words of the League of Nations' Mandate. Whether it was Napoleon claiming fraternité with Egyptians in fin-de-18e-siècle Cairo or George W. Bush claiming similar amity with Iraqis two centuries later, the message, and the means of delivering it, have been consistent.

Ever since Abd al-Rahman al-Jabarti, the great Egyptian chronicler of the French invasion of Egypt, brilliantly dissected Napoleon's epistle to Egyptians, the peoples of the Middle East have seen through the Western protestations of benevolence and altruism to the naked self-interest that has always laid at the heart of great power politics. But the hypocrisy behind Western policies never stopped millions of people across the region from admiring and fighting for the ideals of freedom, progress and democracy they promised.

Even with the rise of a swaggeringly belligerent American foreign policy after September 11 on the one hand, and of China as a viable economic alternative to US global dominance on the other, the US' melting pot democracy and seemingly endless potential for renewal and growth offered a model for the future.

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/201122518445333563.html

[swilton]

1. Outstanding Read!

One for my reference shelf! Thanks for posting!:hi:

[bemildred]

2. What is striking is that the decline in power is causally related to the economic inequality.

With a weak economy and impoverished public, you cannot rule the world, no matter how much you spend. Raygun lead us here, in both ways, the ruling for the rich and the consequent decline in international clout.

[northernlights]

3. in fairness, our "leaders" have wielded their power in ways

not imagined in the ME. Easier perhaps to rebel when you haven't been overfilled with toxic food from birth.

I was in the emergency dept. on a very busy day last week in the hospital where I'm doing clinicals. The majority, if not all, the patients looked sadly like beached whales -- bloated from the cheap American diet that has been carefully spiked by marketers since birth to cause addiction to sugar/fat/salt.

Whereas ME dictators brutalise and/or leave their people to starve, we overfeed addictive, toxic junk from birth until most people can barely roust themselves from a chair, never mind protest in the streets.

I don't know how we fight this. It may take a complete breakdown -- when the stockshelves are empty of cheetos and hormone-stuffed chicken and beef and milk, then maybe...