Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Wimps Out on Tax Cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:17 PM
Original message
Obama Wimps Out on Tax Cuts
Source: Daily Beast via Yahoo News

NEW YORK – Obama Wimps Out on Tax CutsThe president is ready to compromise on the Bush tax cuts and extend them for the rich. Eric Alterman wonders why Obama can’t manage to defend a campaign position that’s both popular and fiscally sound.

It’s happening again. Barack Obama is punching the Republicans in the fist with his face. Almost in spite of themselves, Democrats won the public-opinion battle over extending the Bush tax cuts for Americans making a quarter of a million a year or more with strong majorities supporting their position. They did not have the nerve to hold this vote before the election, and now the nervous nellies appear to be getting ready to throw in the towel (or at least most of it). President Obama, on the other hand, ran for office on a pledge to extend the existing tax rates for families making less than $250,000 a year, while letting the tax cuts for those making over that number expire. The number of Americans lucky enough to earn this kind of money constitutes barely more than 2 percent of the population, though one can imagine they provide a much more impressive proportion of the funds that go into financing election campaigns, whether directly or by stealth.

But with the tax cuts poised to expire Dec. 31, The Washington Post reports that “Obama has opened the door to a compromise with Republicans, signaling a new willingness to accept tax breaks for the wealthy.” He is doing this, meanwhile, as the Republicans continue to stand united against the extension of unemployment benefits for Americans making not $250,000 a year, but nothing.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20101117/ts_dailybeast/11019_obamawimpsoutwithpossiblebushtaxcutcompromise



So BOTH tax cuts for the ultra-rich AND unemployment extensions for millions of Americans are ready to expire within the next 6 weeks.

Guess which one President Obama is giving his attention to?
THIS sort of crap is EXACTLY why the elections turned out the way that they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick to mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not caving in if this was your goal all along
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 10:28 PM by MannyGoldstein
I'm convinced that Obama is working for the Predator Class. No way he could be as dumb and spineless as he's alleged to be.

The DLC wins again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. How is it a compromise?
A compromise is when you get some of what you want in exchange for giving somebody else some of what THEY want.

Giving somebody else ALL of what they want while not getting anything that YOU supposedly want isn't compromise...it's just surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the most ridiculous thing I've read in a long time
Has everyone gone mad?

:rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Will you put yourself on record as saying he won't cave?
I'll be happy to put myself on record as saying he will. Hell, I'll even bookmark this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is not news. It's an analysis piece by Eric Alterman
It's not his best work.

I have no idea what the President is going to do, but he hasn't done it yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So even you do not have enough faith to go on record.
Noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Faith?
I don't have enough information. I'm not inside his head, and not a part of the negotiations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Only the West Wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's all speculation at this point
Opened the door, signaled, insinuated, those are all opinions. It aint over till it's over, and I give this president the benefit of a doubt. So many here jump on every appraisal of what Obama "is going to do" by every pundit and blogger who can write. I judge him by what he does, not what he might do or someone says he's going to do. And, I was a Clinton supporter!

BE real sure of where you are placing blame for things. We all know what we read in the paper and online, but I doubt you will know what strategies the presidents team are executing behind the scenes. Be realistic about what can be done with a divided congress and a USSC weighted with corporatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Strategies behind the scenes??
This isn't that 4-dimensional chess thing is it? Because I am so over that.
I gave the President the benefit of the doubt on health care and I got a mandated corporate policy. When I gave him the benefit of the doubt on the war in Iraq (where Al-Queda were not) , I got a new war in Afghanistan (also where Al-Queda were not). When I gave him the benefit of the doubt in the economy I got several trillion dollars to the ultra-wealthy and very little for the jobless. And when I gave him the benefit of the doubt on Constitutional freedoms (didn't he actually teach that at some point??) I got the continuation of Gitmo and other rendition Camps, the continuation of The Patriot Act and groped by the TSA.

At this point I am all out of benefit and only have doubt left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So very true.....
My vote for Obama made history,and it seems that's all I'll get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. President gave you a new war in Afghanistan? Huh. I have doubt about some things also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. it wasn't new...
but he did have to have his own surge to prove he was as manly as the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Exactly - i used some literary license....
but the point is that he greatly expanded that front - just as you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Which is what he said he would do during the election.
Anyone who was surprised when it happened hadn't been paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. "several trillion dollars to the ultra-wealthy"??!???
Your CONCERN is noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Yes, several trillion....
When you add up the costs of the various bailouts and add in the war cost (Haliburton, Blackwater, GE, etc.) and include the tens of billions of "lost" and unaccounted funds the Pentagon has admitted to over the past 9 years (anyone else remember the C-140 loaded with pallets of U.S. currency enroute to Iraq that was in the news?)
Yeah - add that up and it's Trillions buddy - Trillions of dollars.

Its just too darn bad that your concern doesn't extend to those areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Full quote: "When I gave him the benefit of the doubt in the economy I got several trillion dollars
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 03:19 AM by Turborama
to the ultra-wealthy"

And now you say you were referring to 9 years of war and loans to the banks etc (yes, the bailouts were loans)?

And yes, I do remember the billions that went missing in Bush's illegal war in Iraq and have posted quite a lot about them here in the past. Here's one example: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x376918

And another: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x394128

One more: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x394148

You're continuing to make shit up to besmirch Obama's presidency. Again, you're "concern" is noted, pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Bush... Obama ... I'm talking about American policy for the past 10 years
And I do not see a whole lot of difference, when it comes to war spending and inequality of wealth, between the various administrations.

You keep "noting" my concern.
OK, I will note you noting. {shrugs shoulders}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. No, you were talking about giving "him the benefit of the doubt" and hadn't mentioned Bush at all
You're just embarrassing yourself now.




If you don't get the concern thing, try Googling this phrase: "I'm worried that the candidate's history in the legislature might be a problem in the election".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. OMG! Somebody's wrong on the internet !
OK I get to try out DU's ignre feature for the first time now.
Congrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I feel honored that I'm going to be the first of many you're most likely going to "ignore"
BTW it doesn't mean I won't see your other posts full of epic concern failure in the future to call them out.

Lame.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama is a modern incarnation of the Union General McClellan.
On paper, George McClellan was the best general after Robert E. Lee, but only on paper. He looked the part & acted the part, just like Obama, but totally failed to deliver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. The whole party...
is Gen. McClellan- get the enemy down, get him retreating, then not pursue the enemy. One day the party will need some people like Grant and Sherman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama Wimps Out on Tax Cuts..............Again
What is this, the 3rd or 4th time in the last 2 weeks?

:shrug: :tinfoilhat: :shrug: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So, are YOU willing to go on record as saying he won't cave on this?
I'm going on record as saying he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. He won't
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 12:05 AM by thelordofhell
I'll pick a Democratic President over an opinion piece anyday and twice on Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Actually if you read the article....
you find that high level Whitehouse officials go on record saying that Obama is ready to compromise. Such statements do not get made unless the President wants them to be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Or if some opinion piece writing wonk wants to sell an article
Go ask Huffingtonpost how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. If Obama actually does this, it will do great harm to the nation -- to the Treasury .....
and I hope we'll find a new Democratic candidate in 2012!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Congratulations MODS ... for making this a SMOOTH transition when moved -- !!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilky Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
33. Here's what the WH should say:
"EVERYONE gets a tax cut." Which is true -- if you cap the cuts at 250K as Obama has always said, even the rich would get a cut on their first 250K of income! Why haven't they said this all along? All that is at issue is those dollars above 250K. Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilky Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
34. Here's what the WH should say:
"EVERYONE gets a tax cut." Which is true -- if you cap the cuts at 250K as Obama has always said, even the rich would get a cut on their first 250K of income! Why haven't they said this all along? All that is at issue is those dollars above 250K. Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. Saddly, I'm no longer surprised
Rather than believing Obama lacks a backbone - an assumption one can make only if one assumes Obama wants to do the right thing for middle class Americans - I am beginning to believe that Obama's policy behaviors are deliberate and we've all been/we're all being duped.

I will look more forward to being pleasantly surprised than saddly disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC