Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When GOP gave aid to Muslims - A 2000 law favors the ground zero mosque.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 09:51 AM
Original message
When GOP gave aid to Muslims - A 2000 law favors the ground zero mosque.
Source: Chicago Tribune

When GOP gave aid to Muslims


A 2000 law favors the ground zero mosque.

August 22, 2010


Ten years ago, Republicans in Congress passed a major law to protect the right of Muslims to establish mosques even where such a building might be unwelcome. Yes, they did. They just may not have thought of it quite that way at the time.

The law, called the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, was aimed at a common problem often ignored by the courts: local government bodies using zoning authority to prevent religious institutions from moving in or expanding their operations.

It had the support of such groups as the Christian Legal Society and the Family Research Council. Rep. Charles Canady, R-Fla., said it was aimed at "the well-documented and abusive treatment suffered by religious individuals and organizations in the land use context." Sen. Orrin Hatch, R- Utah, pushed it because, he said, "At the core of religious freedom is the ability for assemblies to gather and worship together."

Today, of course, that statute is a problem for anyone hoping that the city, state or federal government would take action to block an Islamic community center in lower Manhattan, commonly referred to as the ground zero mosque. Many of those opponents are happy to disregard both the law and the Constitution in their effort.

Read more: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0822-chapman-column-20100820,0,1147455.column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn, and in black and white too
Orrin Hatch may just disappear like he did for the 6 months following 9/11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I'm entertained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. ..And now we learn Fox Propaganda, Inc. (R) is owned by the mosque developers
What's up with these whacky republicon hypocrites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. By a Saudi Prince you mean?
So the Prince is a terrorist? I don't know if this is supposed to be a slam on the prince or not. What is the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. According to republicans
all Muslims are terrorists.
Saudi Arabia is 100% Muslim
All Saudis are terrorists according to republican thinking

Can not fault perfect republican logic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He bought into it after their ascendance. At least give the pubbies credit for not
Raising jell over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who is questioning the legality of the thing? What a total strawman.
The question is how smart is this move when most Americans think it is grossly insensitive. When you do things that people find offensive there are consequences not because you exercised your rights but because you are an asshole ala dr Laura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's part 1.
Part 2 is that support for this wasn't all that widespread in certain portions of the political spectrum that many of us are most familiar with. It was deemed a very bad thing.

Now, of course, some of us would deem it a good thing, not because it was and is always a good thing, but because of the end that it serves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes but it is our ends that are served not the Muslim populace as a whole.
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 03:18 AM by dkf
I object to it because I don't see the point in poking the bee hive with a stick. Some people are willing to let other people get stung in order to get the bees nest explode but for most it isn't their necks on the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Christiane Amanpour: Debating the Ground Zero Islamic Center - watch this video
Edited on Sun Aug-22-10 11:30 AM by Douglas Carpenter

an excellent interview with Daisy Khan, wife of Imam Feisal and Rabbi Joy Levitt of the Jewish Community Center of Manhattan discuss the proposed Islamic Center near Ground Zero.

Click on this link below - then click on Debating the Ground Zero Islamic Center :

http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Now on youtube - interview with Daisy Khan and Rabbi Joy Levitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC